快速反应事件促使护理讨论和代码状态变化的目标增加。

IF 1.4
Joelle N Friesen, Erik J Wanberg, Alexandra Allman, Allison LeMahieu, Kelly Pennington, Alice Gallo de Moraes
{"title":"快速反应事件促使护理讨论和代码状态变化的目标增加。","authors":"Joelle N Friesen, Erik J Wanberg, Alexandra Allman, Allison LeMahieu, Kelly Pennington, Alice Gallo de Moraes","doi":"10.1177/10499091251363899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile rapid response teams (RRT) are widely implemented to address clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients, their impact on goals of care (GOC) discussions remains underexplored.AimsWe aimed to evaluate whether RRT activations were associated with subsequent goals of care discussions, code status changes, and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center review of hospitalized adult patients admitted to medicine services who had RRT activations between January and December 2023. The primary outcome was GOC discussion within 72 h of RRT. GOC discussions were identified through EMR documentation of conversations, code status changes, and ACP notes. Secondary outcomes included code status change, transition to comfort care, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Analyses were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting.Results1823 RRTs among 1677 patients were analyzed; 47% of patients were female and 88% identified as white. Those transferred to the ICU had higher odds of goals of care discussions (OR 1.52, <i>P</i> < 0.001), code status change (OR 2.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and transition to comfort care (OR 1.47, <i>P</i> = 0.026) compared to those who remained on the floor. ICU transfer was also associated with increased 30- (OR 1.39, <i>P</i> = 0.006) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.30, <i>P</i> = 0.014).ConclusionsICU transfer following RRT activation is strongly associated with downstream goals of care discussions, changes in code status, comfort-focused care, and higher mortality. This demonstrates the importance of initiating goals of care discussions early and often, regardless of whether clinical decompensation is anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251363899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid Response Events Prompt Increased Goals of Care Discussions and Code Status Changes.\",\"authors\":\"Joelle N Friesen, Erik J Wanberg, Alexandra Allman, Allison LeMahieu, Kelly Pennington, Alice Gallo de Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251363899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundWhile rapid response teams (RRT) are widely implemented to address clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients, their impact on goals of care (GOC) discussions remains underexplored.AimsWe aimed to evaluate whether RRT activations were associated with subsequent goals of care discussions, code status changes, and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center review of hospitalized adult patients admitted to medicine services who had RRT activations between January and December 2023. The primary outcome was GOC discussion within 72 h of RRT. GOC discussions were identified through EMR documentation of conversations, code status changes, and ACP notes. Secondary outcomes included code status change, transition to comfort care, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Analyses were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting.Results1823 RRTs among 1677 patients were analyzed; 47% of patients were female and 88% identified as white. Those transferred to the ICU had higher odds of goals of care discussions (OR 1.52, <i>P</i> < 0.001), code status change (OR 2.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and transition to comfort care (OR 1.47, <i>P</i> = 0.026) compared to those who remained on the floor. ICU transfer was also associated with increased 30- (OR 1.39, <i>P</i> = 0.006) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.30, <i>P</i> = 0.014).ConclusionsICU transfer following RRT activation is strongly associated with downstream goals of care discussions, changes in code status, comfort-focused care, and higher mortality. This demonstrates the importance of initiating goals of care discussions early and often, regardless of whether clinical decompensation is anticipated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251363899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251363899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251363899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然快速反应小组(RRT)被广泛用于解决住院患者的临床恶化问题,但它们对护理目标(GOC)讨论的影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:我们旨在评估RRT激活是否与后续护理讨论目标、代码状态变化和临床结果相关。方法对2023年1月至12月间RRT激活的住院成人患者进行回顾性单中心评价。主要结局是RRT后72小时内的GOC讨论。GOC讨论是通过对话的EMR文档、代码状态更改和ACP注释确定的。次要结局包括代码状态改变、过渡到舒适护理、30天和90天死亡率。使用处理加权逆概率调整分析结果。结果共分析1677例患者中1823例RRTs;47%的患者为女性,88%为白人。转到ICU的患者在护理讨论目标(OR 1.52, P < 0.001)、代码状态改变(OR 2.43, P < 0.001)和过渡到舒适护理(OR 1.47, P = 0.026)方面的几率高于留在地板上的患者。ICU转院也与30天死亡率(OR 1.39, P = 0.006)和90天死亡率(OR 1.30, P = 0.014)升高相关。结论RRT激活后的icu转移与护理讨论的下游目标、编码状态的改变、以舒适为中心的护理和更高的死亡率密切相关。这证明了早期和经常启动护理目标讨论的重要性,无论是否预期临床失代偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid Response Events Prompt Increased Goals of Care Discussions and Code Status Changes.

BackgroundWhile rapid response teams (RRT) are widely implemented to address clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients, their impact on goals of care (GOC) discussions remains underexplored.AimsWe aimed to evaluate whether RRT activations were associated with subsequent goals of care discussions, code status changes, and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center review of hospitalized adult patients admitted to medicine services who had RRT activations between January and December 2023. The primary outcome was GOC discussion within 72 h of RRT. GOC discussions were identified through EMR documentation of conversations, code status changes, and ACP notes. Secondary outcomes included code status change, transition to comfort care, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Analyses were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting.Results1823 RRTs among 1677 patients were analyzed; 47% of patients were female and 88% identified as white. Those transferred to the ICU had higher odds of goals of care discussions (OR 1.52, P < 0.001), code status change (OR 2.43, P < 0.001), and transition to comfort care (OR 1.47, P = 0.026) compared to those who remained on the floor. ICU transfer was also associated with increased 30- (OR 1.39, P = 0.006) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.30, P = 0.014).ConclusionsICU transfer following RRT activation is strongly associated with downstream goals of care discussions, changes in code status, comfort-focused care, and higher mortality. This demonstrates the importance of initiating goals of care discussions early and often, regardless of whether clinical decompensation is anticipated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信