Ruixin Lu, Michael Dismorr, Magnus Dalén, Natalie Glaser, Ulrik Sartipy
{"title":"On-X机械主动脉瓣假体的大出血和血栓栓塞事件:一项瑞典心脏研究。","authors":"Ruixin Lu, Michael Dismorr, Magnus Dalén, Natalie Glaser, Ulrik Sartipy","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lifelong anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in patients with mechanical heart valves. The On-X aortic valve is currently the only mechanical heart valve approved for a lower (1.5-2.0) target international normalized ratio (INR) compared to the standard INR target 2.0-3.0. There is limited evidence demonstrating clinical benefits of the On-X valve over other mechanical aortic valves. We therefore investigated the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide, population-based cohort study, using the target trial emulation framework, included all adults who underwent primary mechanical aortic valve replacement in Sweden 2014-2022 from the SWEDEHEART register. The rates of major bleeding and thromboembolic events were obtained from national registers. Confounding was addressed by weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3047 patients, 656 patients (22%) received an On-X aortic valve and 2391 patients (78%) received other mechanical aortic valves. The mean age was 54 years and 23% were women. After 8 years, the weighted major bleeding cumulative incidence was 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8%-10.7%) in the On-X valve group vs 7.0% (95% CI: 5.5%-8.8%) in the other mechanical valves group, and the weighted cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 7.3% (95% CI: 5.3%-10.2%) in the On-X valve group vs 6.4% (95% CI: 5.0%-7.9%) in the other mechanical valves group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no clinically relevant difference in major bleeding or thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve compared to patients with other mechanical aortic valves.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events with the On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis: A SWEDEHEART Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruixin Lu, Michael Dismorr, Magnus Dalén, Natalie Glaser, Ulrik Sartipy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivaf182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lifelong anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in patients with mechanical heart valves. The On-X aortic valve is currently the only mechanical heart valve approved for a lower (1.5-2.0) target international normalized ratio (INR) compared to the standard INR target 2.0-3.0. There is limited evidence demonstrating clinical benefits of the On-X valve over other mechanical aortic valves. We therefore investigated the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide, population-based cohort study, using the target trial emulation framework, included all adults who underwent primary mechanical aortic valve replacement in Sweden 2014-2022 from the SWEDEHEART register. The rates of major bleeding and thromboembolic events were obtained from national registers. Confounding was addressed by weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3047 patients, 656 patients (22%) received an On-X aortic valve and 2391 patients (78%) received other mechanical aortic valves. The mean age was 54 years and 23% were women. After 8 years, the weighted major bleeding cumulative incidence was 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8%-10.7%) in the On-X valve group vs 7.0% (95% CI: 5.5%-8.8%) in the other mechanical valves group, and the weighted cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 7.3% (95% CI: 5.3%-10.2%) in the On-X valve group vs 6.4% (95% CI: 5.0%-7.9%) in the other mechanical valves group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no clinically relevant difference in major bleeding or thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve compared to patients with other mechanical aortic valves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Major Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events with the On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis: A SWEDEHEART Study.
Objectives: Lifelong anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in patients with mechanical heart valves. The On-X aortic valve is currently the only mechanical heart valve approved for a lower (1.5-2.0) target international normalized ratio (INR) compared to the standard INR target 2.0-3.0. There is limited evidence demonstrating clinical benefits of the On-X valve over other mechanical aortic valves. We therefore investigated the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve.
Methods: This nationwide, population-based cohort study, using the target trial emulation framework, included all adults who underwent primary mechanical aortic valve replacement in Sweden 2014-2022 from the SWEDEHEART register. The rates of major bleeding and thromboembolic events were obtained from national registers. Confounding was addressed by weighting.
Results: Of the 3047 patients, 656 patients (22%) received an On-X aortic valve and 2391 patients (78%) received other mechanical aortic valves. The mean age was 54 years and 23% were women. After 8 years, the weighted major bleeding cumulative incidence was 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8%-10.7%) in the On-X valve group vs 7.0% (95% CI: 5.5%-8.8%) in the other mechanical valves group, and the weighted cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 7.3% (95% CI: 5.3%-10.2%) in the On-X valve group vs 6.4% (95% CI: 5.0%-7.9%) in the other mechanical valves group.
Conclusions: We found no clinically relevant difference in major bleeding or thromboembolic events in patients with the On-X aortic valve compared to patients with other mechanical aortic valves.