加拿大初级保健机构的心理健康诊断特征:有效电子病历病例定义的应用

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Leanne Kosowan, Alexander G Singer, Elissa M Abrams, Sameer S Kassim, Braden O'Neill, Jennifer L P Protudjer
{"title":"加拿大初级保健机构的心理健康诊断特征:有效电子病历病例定义的应用","authors":"Leanne Kosowan, Alexander G Singer, Elissa M Abrams, Sameer S Kassim, Braden O'Neill, Jennifer L P Protudjer","doi":"10.46747/cfp.710708e195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a primary care electronic medical record (EMR) case definition for mood and anxiety disorders (including depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder) and schizophrenia that can be used to estimate prevalence and co-occurrence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>De-identified EMR data was used from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) from 1,692,987 patients who had 1 or more visits with a primary care provider. The reference set included 2488 patients, with 434 positive and 2054 negative for 1 or more mental health conditions of interest. A second reference set for schizophrenia represented 760 patients (30 positive and 730 negative).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The agreement of 29 case definitions was assessed against a reference set by reporting sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Prevalence was estimated and co-occurrence was assessed in the CPCSSN dataset (N=1,692,987).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest definition for mood disorders captured anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder with a sensitivity of 80.7%, specificity of 88.7%, PPV of 59.9%, and NPV of 95.7%; and an estimated prevalence of 21.8% (95% CI 21.7 to 21.9). The inclusion of psychosis did not improve agreement (sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 80.7%, PPV 51.0%, NPV 98.8%), but schizophrenia alone had high agreement (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 99.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High co-occurrence of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder was found. Algorithms validated to capture these conditions together produced stronger agreement compared with individual definitions. Schizophrenia was less likely to co-occur with other mental health conditions and produced higher agreement when validated separately. Application of validated algorithms to capture mental health conditions can inform disease surveillance and health system planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":55288,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Family Physician","volume":"71 7-8","pages":"e195-e204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing mental health diagnosis within Canadian primary care settings: Application of validated electronic medical record case definitions.\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Kosowan, Alexander G Singer, Elissa M Abrams, Sameer S Kassim, Braden O'Neill, Jennifer L P Protudjer\",\"doi\":\"10.46747/cfp.710708e195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a primary care electronic medical record (EMR) case definition for mood and anxiety disorders (including depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder) and schizophrenia that can be used to estimate prevalence and co-occurrence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>De-identified EMR data was used from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) from 1,692,987 patients who had 1 or more visits with a primary care provider. The reference set included 2488 patients, with 434 positive and 2054 negative for 1 or more mental health conditions of interest. A second reference set for schizophrenia represented 760 patients (30 positive and 730 negative).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The agreement of 29 case definitions was assessed against a reference set by reporting sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Prevalence was estimated and co-occurrence was assessed in the CPCSSN dataset (N=1,692,987).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest definition for mood disorders captured anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder with a sensitivity of 80.7%, specificity of 88.7%, PPV of 59.9%, and NPV of 95.7%; and an estimated prevalence of 21.8% (95% CI 21.7 to 21.9). The inclusion of psychosis did not improve agreement (sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 80.7%, PPV 51.0%, NPV 98.8%), but schizophrenia alone had high agreement (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 99.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High co-occurrence of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder was found. Algorithms validated to capture these conditions together produced stronger agreement compared with individual definitions. Schizophrenia was less likely to co-occur with other mental health conditions and produced higher agreement when validated separately. Application of validated algorithms to capture mental health conditions can inform disease surveillance and health system planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Family Physician\",\"volume\":\"71 7-8\",\"pages\":\"e195-e204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Family Physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.710708e195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.710708e195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证初级保健电子病历(EMR)对情绪和焦虑障碍(包括抑郁、焦虑和双相情感障碍)和精神分裂症的病例定义,该定义可用于估计患病率和共发率。设计:回顾性横断面研究。设置:加拿大。参与者:去识别的EMR数据来自1574名参与加拿大初级保健哨点监测网络(cpcsn)的初级保健提供者,来自1,692,987名与初级保健提供者进行过一次或多次就诊的患者。参考集包括2488例患者,其中434例阳性,2054例阴性,有一种或多种感兴趣的心理健康状况。精神分裂症的第二个参考组有760名患者(30名阳性和730名阴性)。主要结局指标:29例病例定义的一致性通过报告敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性进行评估。在cpcsn数据集(N=1,692,987)中估计患病率并评估共发生情况。结果:情绪障碍的最强定义包括焦虑、抑郁和双相情感障碍,敏感性为80.7%,特异性为88.7%,PPV为59.9%,NPV为95.7%;估计患病率为21.8% (95% CI为21.7 ~ 21.9)。纳入精神病并没有提高一致性(敏感性95.2%,特异性80.7%,PPV 51.0%, NPV 98.8%),但单独纳入精神分裂症具有较高的一致性(敏感性93.3%,特异性100%,PPV 100%, NPV 99.9%)。结论:焦虑、抑郁和双相情感障碍的发生率较高。与单个定义相比,通过验证将这些条件集合在一起的算法产生了更强的一致性。精神分裂症不太可能与其他精神健康状况同时发生,并且在单独验证时产生更高的一致性。应用经过验证的算法来捕捉精神健康状况,可以为疾病监测和卫生系统规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing mental health diagnosis within Canadian primary care settings: Application of validated electronic medical record case definitions.

Objective: To validate a primary care electronic medical record (EMR) case definition for mood and anxiety disorders (including depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder) and schizophrenia that can be used to estimate prevalence and co-occurrence.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting: Canada.

Participants: De-identified EMR data was used from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) from 1,692,987 patients who had 1 or more visits with a primary care provider. The reference set included 2488 patients, with 434 positive and 2054 negative for 1 or more mental health conditions of interest. A second reference set for schizophrenia represented 760 patients (30 positive and 730 negative).

Main outcome measures: The agreement of 29 case definitions was assessed against a reference set by reporting sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Prevalence was estimated and co-occurrence was assessed in the CPCSSN dataset (N=1,692,987).

Results: The strongest definition for mood disorders captured anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder with a sensitivity of 80.7%, specificity of 88.7%, PPV of 59.9%, and NPV of 95.7%; and an estimated prevalence of 21.8% (95% CI 21.7 to 21.9). The inclusion of psychosis did not improve agreement (sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 80.7%, PPV 51.0%, NPV 98.8%), but schizophrenia alone had high agreement (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 99.9%).

Conclusion: High co-occurrence of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder was found. Algorithms validated to capture these conditions together produced stronger agreement compared with individual definitions. Schizophrenia was less likely to co-occur with other mental health conditions and produced higher agreement when validated separately. Application of validated algorithms to capture mental health conditions can inform disease surveillance and health system planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Family Physician
Canadian Family Physician 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: Canadian Family Physician (CFP), a peer-reviewed medical journal, is the official publication of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Our mission is to ensure that practitioners, researchers, educators and policy makers are informed on current issues and in touch with the latest thinking in the discipline of family medicine; to serve family physicians in all types of practice in every part of Canada in both official languages; to advance the continuing development of family medicine as a discipline; and to contribute to the ongoing improvement of patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信