{"title":"视觉感知和人体工程学影响:通过侧视镜评估盲点可变性和距离估计。","authors":"Anik Barat, Sanhita Das","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2538712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Driving safety has emerged as a global challenge, particularly in car-motorised two-wheeler (MTW) interactions, which are frequently observed in urban mixed-traffic conditions. This study examines mirror-specific challenges, focusing on blind spot variability and perception errors associated with convex side-view mirrors. To enhance real-world applicability, the study was conducted with professional car drivers to enhance real-world applicability. Findings reveal that the left-side mirror (passenger-side) has a larger blind spot area (14.57 m<sup>2</sup>) compared to the right-side (driver-side, 12.15 m<sup>2</sup>). To better understand mirror visibility, driver-specific ergonomic factors, such as eye-to-dashboard and eye-to-mirror distance were explored. The results further highlight that drivers tend to overestimate MTW distances, with errors being more pronounced in the left-side mirror, increasing the crash risk on that side. These insights indicate the need for improved mirror design, driver training education, and policy interventions to enhance visibility, improve driver awareness, and to mitigate MTW-related crash risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual perception and ergonomic influences: Assessing blind spot variability and distance estimation through side-view mirrors.\",\"authors\":\"Anik Barat, Sanhita Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2538712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Driving safety has emerged as a global challenge, particularly in car-motorised two-wheeler (MTW) interactions, which are frequently observed in urban mixed-traffic conditions. This study examines mirror-specific challenges, focusing on blind spot variability and perception errors associated with convex side-view mirrors. To enhance real-world applicability, the study was conducted with professional car drivers to enhance real-world applicability. Findings reveal that the left-side mirror (passenger-side) has a larger blind spot area (14.57 m<sup>2</sup>) compared to the right-side (driver-side, 12.15 m<sup>2</sup>). To better understand mirror visibility, driver-specific ergonomic factors, such as eye-to-dashboard and eye-to-mirror distance were explored. The results further highlight that drivers tend to overestimate MTW distances, with errors being more pronounced in the left-side mirror, increasing the crash risk on that side. These insights indicate the need for improved mirror design, driver training education, and policy interventions to enhance visibility, improve driver awareness, and to mitigate MTW-related crash risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2538712\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2538712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visual perception and ergonomic influences: Assessing blind spot variability and distance estimation through side-view mirrors.
Driving safety has emerged as a global challenge, particularly in car-motorised two-wheeler (MTW) interactions, which are frequently observed in urban mixed-traffic conditions. This study examines mirror-specific challenges, focusing on blind spot variability and perception errors associated with convex side-view mirrors. To enhance real-world applicability, the study was conducted with professional car drivers to enhance real-world applicability. Findings reveal that the left-side mirror (passenger-side) has a larger blind spot area (14.57 m2) compared to the right-side (driver-side, 12.15 m2). To better understand mirror visibility, driver-specific ergonomic factors, such as eye-to-dashboard and eye-to-mirror distance were explored. The results further highlight that drivers tend to overestimate MTW distances, with errors being more pronounced in the left-side mirror, increasing the crash risk on that side. These insights indicate the need for improved mirror design, driver training education, and policy interventions to enhance visibility, improve driver awareness, and to mitigate MTW-related crash risks.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.