{"title":"评论:在智能手机时代保护青年:重新思考行动证据-评论赖等人(2025)。","authors":"Lisa Henderson, Emma Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/camh.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smartphones – used for accessing social media, gaming and peer interaction – account for the majority of screen time among children and adolescents, with many exceeding 5 h of daily use. Despite growing concern over negative impacts, action to safeguard our children from the potentially damaging effects has been slow, with concern dismissed as ‘moral panic’ in the absence of definitive causal evidence. Obtaining causal evidence is fraught with methodological challenges, exemplified by Lai and colleagues' timely synthesis of school-based interventions to reduce screen time. Such approaches (e.g. self-guided strategies/educational interventions) provide limited evidence of behaviour change and, unsurprisingly, effects rarely transfer to critical outcomes such as well-being and academic performance. Alongside gathering robust theory-driven causal evidence that can lead to strategies for promoting healthy digital behaviours, these findings reinforce the need to draw on multiple strands of evidence to inform policy. A multi-sector approach – spanning education, health and home – co-designed with young people is essential to fostering a healthier digital future.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"30 3","pages":"281-284"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary: Safeguarding youth in the smartphone era: rethinking evidence for action – a commentary on Lai et al. (2025)\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Henderson, Emma Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/camh.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Smartphones – used for accessing social media, gaming and peer interaction – account for the majority of screen time among children and adolescents, with many exceeding 5 h of daily use. Despite growing concern over negative impacts, action to safeguard our children from the potentially damaging effects has been slow, with concern dismissed as ‘moral panic’ in the absence of definitive causal evidence. Obtaining causal evidence is fraught with methodological challenges, exemplified by Lai and colleagues' timely synthesis of school-based interventions to reduce screen time. Such approaches (e.g. self-guided strategies/educational interventions) provide limited evidence of behaviour change and, unsurprisingly, effects rarely transfer to critical outcomes such as well-being and academic performance. Alongside gathering robust theory-driven causal evidence that can lead to strategies for promoting healthy digital behaviours, these findings reinforce the need to draw on multiple strands of evidence to inform policy. A multi-sector approach – spanning education, health and home – co-designed with young people is essential to fostering a healthier digital future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"281-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Commentary: Safeguarding youth in the smartphone era: rethinking evidence for action – a commentary on Lai et al. (2025)
Smartphones – used for accessing social media, gaming and peer interaction – account for the majority of screen time among children and adolescents, with many exceeding 5 h of daily use. Despite growing concern over negative impacts, action to safeguard our children from the potentially damaging effects has been slow, with concern dismissed as ‘moral panic’ in the absence of definitive causal evidence. Obtaining causal evidence is fraught with methodological challenges, exemplified by Lai and colleagues' timely synthesis of school-based interventions to reduce screen time. Such approaches (e.g. self-guided strategies/educational interventions) provide limited evidence of behaviour change and, unsurprisingly, effects rarely transfer to critical outcomes such as well-being and academic performance. Alongside gathering robust theory-driven causal evidence that can lead to strategies for promoting healthy digital behaviours, these findings reinforce the need to draw on multiple strands of evidence to inform policy. A multi-sector approach – spanning education, health and home – co-designed with young people is essential to fostering a healthier digital future.
期刊介绍:
Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.