{"title":"甲状腺球蛋白抗体联合甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体对早孕不良结局的预测作用","authors":"Peiheng Zhang, Weijie Sun, Jing Wang, Yang Zhang, Huixia Yang, Ying Gao","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04309-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore whether combined assessment of TgAb and TPOAb perform a higher predictive value to adverse pregnancy outcomes than isolated TPOAb during early pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 4678 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at Peking University First Hospital from October 2017 to August 2018. Demographic and clinical data, including thyroid hormone levels, were retrieved from electronic medical records. The general information and incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between different subgroups of thyroid function and antibody status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2673 women were enrolled. 6.70% (179/2673) and 8.27% (221/2673) of the pregnant women were TPOAb positive and TgAb positive, respectively. The median thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level was higher in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group [1.40 (0.96, 2.01) vs. 1.34 (0.86, 1.92), P = 0.045]. The prevalence of maternal composite outcomes (66.08% vs. 58.90%, p = 0.09) and fetal loss (10.49% vs. 5.78%, P = 0.02) was greater among women with 2.5 < TSH ≤ 4.08 mIU/L than among those with 0.23 < TSH ≤ 2.5 mIU/L. When the TSH concentration ranged from 0.23 to 2.5 mIU/L, the prevalence of fetal loss was greater in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group (8.33% vs. 5.43%, P = 0.04). Compared with TPOAb measruement alone, the predictive value of the TPOAb and TgAb combined assessment for maternal (AUC values: 0.509, 95% CI = 0.485 ~ 0.532) and fetal (AUC values: 0.512, 95% CI = 0.458 ~ 0.565) adverse outcomes was not higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under current treatment recommendations, the combined assessment of TPOAb and TgAb during pregnancy has limited predictive value for maternal-fetal adverse outcomes among euthyroid women compared with isolated TPOAb.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the predictive role of thyroglobulin antibodies combined with thyroid peroxidase antibodies on adverse pregnancy outcomes during early pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Peiheng Zhang, Weijie Sun, Jing Wang, Yang Zhang, Huixia Yang, Ying Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-025-04309-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to explore whether combined assessment of TgAb and TPOAb perform a higher predictive value to adverse pregnancy outcomes than isolated TPOAb during early pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 4678 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at Peking University First Hospital from October 2017 to August 2018. Demographic and clinical data, including thyroid hormone levels, were retrieved from electronic medical records. The general information and incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between different subgroups of thyroid function and antibody status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2673 women were enrolled. 6.70% (179/2673) and 8.27% (221/2673) of the pregnant women were TPOAb positive and TgAb positive, respectively. The median thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level was higher in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group [1.40 (0.96, 2.01) vs. 1.34 (0.86, 1.92), P = 0.045]. The prevalence of maternal composite outcomes (66.08% vs. 58.90%, p = 0.09) and fetal loss (10.49% vs. 5.78%, P = 0.02) was greater among women with 2.5 < TSH ≤ 4.08 mIU/L than among those with 0.23 < TSH ≤ 2.5 mIU/L. When the TSH concentration ranged from 0.23 to 2.5 mIU/L, the prevalence of fetal loss was greater in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group (8.33% vs. 5.43%, P = 0.04). Compared with TPOAb measruement alone, the predictive value of the TPOAb and TgAb combined assessment for maternal (AUC values: 0.509, 95% CI = 0.485 ~ 0.532) and fetal (AUC values: 0.512, 95% CI = 0.458 ~ 0.565) adverse outcomes was not higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under current treatment recommendations, the combined assessment of TPOAb and TgAb during pregnancy has limited predictive value for maternal-fetal adverse outcomes among euthyroid women compared with isolated TPOAb.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04309-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04309-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the predictive role of thyroglobulin antibodies combined with thyroid peroxidase antibodies on adverse pregnancy outcomes during early pregnancy.
Objective: The objective of this study was to explore whether combined assessment of TgAb and TPOAb perform a higher predictive value to adverse pregnancy outcomes than isolated TPOAb during early pregnancy.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 4678 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at Peking University First Hospital from October 2017 to August 2018. Demographic and clinical data, including thyroid hormone levels, were retrieved from electronic medical records. The general information and incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between different subgroups of thyroid function and antibody status.
Results: In total, 2673 women were enrolled. 6.70% (179/2673) and 8.27% (221/2673) of the pregnant women were TPOAb positive and TgAb positive, respectively. The median thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level was higher in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group [1.40 (0.96, 2.01) vs. 1.34 (0.86, 1.92), P = 0.045]. The prevalence of maternal composite outcomes (66.08% vs. 58.90%, p = 0.09) and fetal loss (10.49% vs. 5.78%, P = 0.02) was greater among women with 2.5 < TSH ≤ 4.08 mIU/L than among those with 0.23 < TSH ≤ 2.5 mIU/L. When the TSH concentration ranged from 0.23 to 2.5 mIU/L, the prevalence of fetal loss was greater in the TPOAb or TgAb positive group than in the antibody-negative group (8.33% vs. 5.43%, P = 0.04). Compared with TPOAb measruement alone, the predictive value of the TPOAb and TgAb combined assessment for maternal (AUC values: 0.509, 95% CI = 0.485 ~ 0.532) and fetal (AUC values: 0.512, 95% CI = 0.458 ~ 0.565) adverse outcomes was not higher.
Conclusion: Under current treatment recommendations, the combined assessment of TPOAb and TgAb during pregnancy has limited predictive value for maternal-fetal adverse outcomes among euthyroid women compared with isolated TPOAb.
期刊介绍:
Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology.
Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted.
Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.