独立分娩中心分娩护理的产妇和新生儿结局。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.7208.4596
Nathalie Leister, Gisele Almeida Lopes, Caroline de Oliveira Ferreira Iguchi, Thalita Vital Botelho, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco
{"title":"独立分娩中心分娩护理的产妇和新生儿结局。","authors":"Nathalie Leister, Gisele Almeida Lopes, Caroline de Oliveira Ferreira Iguchi, Thalita Vital Botelho, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.7208.4596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>to compare maternal and neonatal care outcomes based on women's parity and to describe neonatal morbidity and mortality among newborns of women admitted in labor.</p><p><p>a cross-sectional study involving 3,397 women admitted for childbirth at a Freestanding Birth Centre and their newborns. The exposure variable was parity, and the outcomes included the use of oxytocin and amniotomy, type of birth, perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and neonatal transfer, and newborn admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Data were analyzed descriptively and through logistic regression.</p><p><p>primiparity was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving oxytocin and amniotomy, intrapartum transfer, second-degree tear, episiotomy, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section, forceps-assisted birth, and neonatal admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Births predominantly occurred in semi-seated and upright positions, either on a bed or in the birthing tub. The maternal transfer rate was 21.8%, while the neonatal transfer rate was 3.3%.</p><p><p>primiparity is a predictor of the analyzed interventions and unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the studied Freestanding Birth Centre can be considered a safe setting for childbirth among health pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"33 ","pages":"e4596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of childbirth care in a Freestanding Birth Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Leister, Gisele Almeida Lopes, Caroline de Oliveira Ferreira Iguchi, Thalita Vital Botelho, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1518-8345.7208.4596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>to compare maternal and neonatal care outcomes based on women's parity and to describe neonatal morbidity and mortality among newborns of women admitted in labor.</p><p><p>a cross-sectional study involving 3,397 women admitted for childbirth at a Freestanding Birth Centre and their newborns. The exposure variable was parity, and the outcomes included the use of oxytocin and amniotomy, type of birth, perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and neonatal transfer, and newborn admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Data were analyzed descriptively and through logistic regression.</p><p><p>primiparity was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving oxytocin and amniotomy, intrapartum transfer, second-degree tear, episiotomy, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section, forceps-assisted birth, and neonatal admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Births predominantly occurred in semi-seated and upright positions, either on a bed or in the birthing tub. The maternal transfer rate was 21.8%, while the neonatal transfer rate was 3.3%.</p><p><p>primiparity is a predictor of the analyzed interventions and unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the studied Freestanding Birth Centre can be considered a safe setting for childbirth among health pregnant women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"e4596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7208.4596\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7208.4596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较基于妇女胎次的孕产妇和新生儿护理结果,并描述分娩妇女新生儿的新生儿发病率和死亡率。这是一项横断面研究,涉及3397名在独立分娩中心分娩的妇女和她们的新生儿。暴露变量为胎次,结果包括催产素和羊膜切开术的使用、出生类型、会阴创伤、产后出血、孕产妇和新生儿转移、新生儿入住新生儿重症监护病房或中间监护病房。对数据进行描述性和逻辑回归分析。初产与接受催产素和羊膜切开术、产时转移、二度撕裂、会阴切开术、产后出血、剖宫产、产钳辅助分娩以及新生儿入住新生儿重症监护病房或中级监护病房的可能性较高相关。分娩主要发生在半坐姿和直立姿势,要么在床上,要么在分娩盆里。产妇移植率为21.8%,新生儿移植率为3.3%。初产是分析干预和不利的孕产妇和新生儿结局的预测因子。然而,所研究的独立式分娩中心可以被认为是健康孕妇分娩的安全环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of childbirth care in a Freestanding Birth Centre.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of childbirth care in a Freestanding Birth Centre.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of childbirth care in a Freestanding Birth Centre.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of childbirth care in a Freestanding Birth Centre.

to compare maternal and neonatal care outcomes based on women's parity and to describe neonatal morbidity and mortality among newborns of women admitted in labor.

a cross-sectional study involving 3,397 women admitted for childbirth at a Freestanding Birth Centre and their newborns. The exposure variable was parity, and the outcomes included the use of oxytocin and amniotomy, type of birth, perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal and neonatal transfer, and newborn admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Data were analyzed descriptively and through logistic regression.

primiparity was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving oxytocin and amniotomy, intrapartum transfer, second-degree tear, episiotomy, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section, forceps-assisted birth, and neonatal admission to neonatal intensive or intermediate care units. Births predominantly occurred in semi-seated and upright positions, either on a bed or in the birthing tub. The maternal transfer rate was 21.8%, while the neonatal transfer rate was 3.3%.

primiparity is a predictor of the analyzed interventions and unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, the studied Freestanding Birth Centre can be considered a safe setting for childbirth among health pregnant women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信