急诊运输方式与急诊科结果的差异:流行病学分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Fabian Unterholzer, Paolo Berenzi, Gianni Turcato
{"title":"急诊运输方式与急诊科结果的差异:流行病学分析。","authors":"Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Fabian Unterholzer, Paolo Berenzi, Gianni Turcato","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital emergency services have evolved significantly, with increased specialization and deployment of advanced transport systems. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential overutilization of these resources by patients who may not present with clinically urgent conditions. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the mode of arrival to the Emergency Department (ED) and the clinical severity upon evaluation, emphasizing the appropriateness of advanced emergency transport use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study analyzing all ED visits (n = 1 282 976) from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, across seven hospitals in the Province of Bolzano, Italy. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Variables included patient demographics, mode of arrival, triage priority and hospital admission. Logistic regression models adjusted for hospital-level clustering were used to assess associations between transport modality and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (77.4%) arrived by self-transport, while 0.8% arrived by helicopter. Although advanced transport was associated with higher odds of urgent triage and hospital admission, a substantial proportion of patients transported by helicopter (approximately 50%) or physician-staffed ambulance (approximately 30%) were discharged or assigned non-urgent triage codes. Logistic regression confirmed that advanced transport significantly decreased the odds of receiving a non-urgent code and increased the likelihood of admission; however, notable overtriage persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight a mismatch between transport modality and clinical urgency in a significant number of cases. Enhancing emergency dispatch protocols and refining prehospital triage systems are critical to ensuring resource sustainability and optimizing care delivery within public healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies Between Emergency Transport Modality and Emergency Department Outcomes: An Epidemiological Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Fabian Unterholzer, Paolo Berenzi, Gianni Turcato\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital emergency services have evolved significantly, with increased specialization and deployment of advanced transport systems. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential overutilization of these resources by patients who may not present with clinically urgent conditions. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the mode of arrival to the Emergency Department (ED) and the clinical severity upon evaluation, emphasizing the appropriateness of advanced emergency transport use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study analyzing all ED visits (n = 1 282 976) from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, across seven hospitals in the Province of Bolzano, Italy. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Variables included patient demographics, mode of arrival, triage priority and hospital admission. Logistic regression models adjusted for hospital-level clustering were used to assess associations between transport modality and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (77.4%) arrived by self-transport, while 0.8% arrived by helicopter. Although advanced transport was associated with higher odds of urgent triage and hospital admission, a substantial proportion of patients transported by helicopter (approximately 50%) or physician-staffed ambulance (approximately 30%) were discharged or assigned non-urgent triage codes. Logistic regression confirmed that advanced transport significantly decreased the odds of receiving a non-urgent code and increased the likelihood of admission; however, notable overtriage persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight a mismatch between transport modality and clinical urgency in a significant number of cases. Enhancing emergency dispatch protocols and refining prehospital triage systems are critical to ensuring resource sustainability and optimizing care delivery within public healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着专业化程度的提高和先进运输系统的部署,院前急救服务已经有了显著的发展。然而,对于可能没有临床紧急情况的患者可能过度使用这些资源,人们提出了担忧。本研究旨在探讨急诊科(ED)到达方式与评估后临床严重程度的关系,强调提前使用急诊运输的适宜性。方法:我们进行了一项多中心回顾性观察性研究,分析了意大利博尔扎诺省7家医院2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间的所有急诊科就诊情况(n = 1 282 976)。数据从电子健康记录中提取。变量包括患者人口统计、到达方式、分诊优先级和住院情况。采用经医院级聚类调整的Logistic回归模型来评估运输方式与结果之间的关系。结果:77.4%的患者选择自驾车到达医院,0.8%的患者选择直升机到达医院。虽然先进的运输与紧急分诊和住院的几率较高相关,但由直升机(约50%)或由医生配备的救护车(约30%)运送的相当大比例的患者出院或分配了非紧急分诊代码。Logistic回归证实,先进的运输显著降低了接收非紧急代码的几率,增加了入院的可能性;然而,明显的过度分类仍然存在。结论:研究结果强调了大量病例中运输方式和临床急迫性之间的不匹配。加强紧急调度协议和完善院前分诊系统对于确保资源可持续性和优化公共卫生系统内的护理提供至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepancies Between Emergency Transport Modality and Emergency Department Outcomes: An Epidemiological Analysis.

Background: Prehospital emergency services have evolved significantly, with increased specialization and deployment of advanced transport systems. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential overutilization of these resources by patients who may not present with clinically urgent conditions. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the mode of arrival to the Emergency Department (ED) and the clinical severity upon evaluation, emphasizing the appropriateness of advanced emergency transport use.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study analyzing all ED visits (n = 1 282 976) from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, across seven hospitals in the Province of Bolzano, Italy. Data were extracted from electronic health records. Variables included patient demographics, mode of arrival, triage priority and hospital admission. Logistic regression models adjusted for hospital-level clustering were used to assess associations between transport modality and outcomes.

Results: Most patients (77.4%) arrived by self-transport, while 0.8% arrived by helicopter. Although advanced transport was associated with higher odds of urgent triage and hospital admission, a substantial proportion of patients transported by helicopter (approximately 50%) or physician-staffed ambulance (approximately 30%) were discharged or assigned non-urgent triage codes. Logistic regression confirmed that advanced transport significantly decreased the odds of receiving a non-urgent code and increased the likelihood of admission; however, notable overtriage persisted.

Conclusions: The findings highlight a mismatch between transport modality and clinical urgency in a significant number of cases. Enhancing emergency dispatch protocols and refining prehospital triage systems are critical to ensuring resource sustainability and optimizing care delivery within public healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信