耳鸣患者的反应时间、振幅和神经听觉维持:一项比较研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20240211pt
Christine Grellmann Schumacher, Helinton Goulart Moreira, Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes, Larianny Rutzen Lazzari, Michele Vargas Garcia, Dayane Domeneghini Didoné
{"title":"耳鸣患者的反应时间、振幅和神经听觉维持:一项比较研究。","authors":"Christine Grellmann Schumacher, Helinton Goulart Moreira, Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes, Larianny Rutzen Lazzari, Michele Vargas Garcia, Dayane Domeneghini Didoné","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240211pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify and compare the response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance of the central auditory pathway in subjects with and without tinnitus disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an analytical, cross-sectional, and quantitative study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The responses of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with verbal stimuli were compared between 16 subjects with tinnitus disorder (Study Group - SG) and 12 subjects without tinnitus (Control Group - CG). The neural response time was evaluated by the latency of the P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300 potentials. The amplitude of these potentials was also analyzed. Neural response maintenance was verified through the duration values of the P300 component. The results were compared between the groups, considering a significance level of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison between the groups regarding the latency and amplitude values of the cortical potentials (P1, N1, P2, and N2), no statistically significant differences were observed (p>0.05). However, concerning the latency, amplitude, and duration of the P300 component between the groups, a statistically significant difference was observed for the latency variable, which was greater for individuals with tinnitus disorder (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with tinnitus disorder have a longer neural response time for the P300 component, suggesting disorganization in central auditory processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 4","pages":"e20240211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance in individuals with tinnitus: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Grellmann Schumacher, Helinton Goulart Moreira, Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes, Larianny Rutzen Lazzari, Michele Vargas Garcia, Dayane Domeneghini Didoné\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240211pt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify and compare the response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance of the central auditory pathway in subjects with and without tinnitus disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an analytical, cross-sectional, and quantitative study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The responses of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with verbal stimuli were compared between 16 subjects with tinnitus disorder (Study Group - SG) and 12 subjects without tinnitus (Control Group - CG). The neural response time was evaluated by the latency of the P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300 potentials. The amplitude of these potentials was also analyzed. Neural response maintenance was verified through the duration values of the P300 component. The results were compared between the groups, considering a significance level of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison between the groups regarding the latency and amplitude values of the cortical potentials (P1, N1, P2, and N2), no statistically significant differences were observed (p>0.05). However, concerning the latency, amplitude, and duration of the P300 component between the groups, a statistically significant difference was observed for the latency variable, which was greater for individuals with tinnitus disorder (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with tinnitus disorder have a longer neural response time for the P300 component, suggesting disorganization in central auditory processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoDAS\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"e20240211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoDAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240211pt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240211pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证和比较有耳鸣障碍和无耳鸣障碍受试者中枢听觉通路的反应时间、振幅和神经听觉维持。方法:这是一项经研究伦理委员会批准的分析性、横断面性和定量研究。比较了16例耳鸣障碍患者(研究组- SG)和12例非耳鸣患者(对照组- CG)的长潜伏期听觉诱发电位(LLAEP)对言语刺激的反应。通过P1、N1、P2、N2和P300电位的潜伏期评估神经反应时间。对这些电位的振幅也进行了分析。通过P300分量的持续时间值验证神经反应维持。将两组结果进行比较,考虑显著性水平为5%。结果:各组间皮质电位(P1、N1、P2、N2)潜伏期及振幅值比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,在P300分量的潜伏期、振幅和持续时间方面,两组间的潜伏期变量差异有统计学意义,耳鸣障碍个体的潜伏期差异更大(结论:耳鸣障碍个体对P300分量的神经反应时间更长,提示中枢听觉加工紊乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance in individuals with tinnitus: a comparative study.

Response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance in individuals with tinnitus: a comparative study.

Response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance in individuals with tinnitus: a comparative study.

Response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance in individuals with tinnitus: a comparative study.

Purpose: To verify and compare the response time, amplitude, and neural auditory maintenance of the central auditory pathway in subjects with and without tinnitus disorder.

Methods: This is an analytical, cross-sectional, and quantitative study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The responses of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (LLAEP) with verbal stimuli were compared between 16 subjects with tinnitus disorder (Study Group - SG) and 12 subjects without tinnitus (Control Group - CG). The neural response time was evaluated by the latency of the P1, N1, P2, N2, and P300 potentials. The amplitude of these potentials was also analyzed. Neural response maintenance was verified through the duration values of the P300 component. The results were compared between the groups, considering a significance level of 5%.

Results: In the comparison between the groups regarding the latency and amplitude values of the cortical potentials (P1, N1, P2, and N2), no statistically significant differences were observed (p>0.05). However, concerning the latency, amplitude, and duration of the P300 component between the groups, a statistically significant difference was observed for the latency variable, which was greater for individuals with tinnitus disorder (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Individuals with tinnitus disorder have a longer neural response time for the P300 component, suggesting disorganization in central auditory processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信