{"title":"沟通技巧评估量表:对自闭症谱系障碍的验证的贡献。","authors":"Diana Oliveira, Marisa Lousada, Daniela Figueiredo","doi":"10.1177/23969415251362626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Speech-language pathologists actively participate in the assessment of pragmatics in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, in Portugal, there is a shortage of valid and reliable instruments to assess this domain in detail. Therefore, it was deemed relevant to help validate the <i>Escala de Avaliação de Competências Comunicativas</i> (EAC) (Communicative Skills Assessment Scale) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted. The sample included 97 children, aged between 4 and 7 years and 11 months, diagnosed with ASD with European Portuguese as their native language. As an exclusion criterion, the co-occurrence of intellectual developmental disorder was defined. The internal consistency of the EAC was analyzed through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Convergent validity was also analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EAC presented a high internal consistency value, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 27) revealed good stability in the participants' responses at both assessment moments, with ICC values varying between 0.642 and 0.842. In the study of convergent validity, statistically significant correlations were observed between the EAC total score and the two scales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Portuguese Version (SDQ-Por): relationship problems with colleagues (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.273; <i>p</i> < .01) and prosocial behavior (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.606; <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EAC presents good reliability and validity for children with ASD, suggesting its adequacy as a research and clinical tool for testing pragmatics within this population.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study will improve clinical decision making regarding ASD and guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":"10 ","pages":"23969415251362626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicative Skills Assessment Scale: Contributions to the Validation of Autism Spectrum Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Diana Oliveira, Marisa Lousada, Daniela Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969415251362626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Speech-language pathologists actively participate in the assessment of pragmatics in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, in Portugal, there is a shortage of valid and reliable instruments to assess this domain in detail. Therefore, it was deemed relevant to help validate the <i>Escala de Avaliação de Competências Comunicativas</i> (EAC) (Communicative Skills Assessment Scale) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted. The sample included 97 children, aged between 4 and 7 years and 11 months, diagnosed with ASD with European Portuguese as their native language. As an exclusion criterion, the co-occurrence of intellectual developmental disorder was defined. The internal consistency of the EAC was analyzed through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Convergent validity was also analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EAC presented a high internal consistency value, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 27) revealed good stability in the participants' responses at both assessment moments, with ICC values varying between 0.642 and 0.842. In the study of convergent validity, statistically significant correlations were observed between the EAC total score and the two scales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Portuguese Version (SDQ-Por): relationship problems with colleagues (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.273; <i>p</i> < .01) and prosocial behavior (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.606; <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EAC presents good reliability and validity for children with ASD, suggesting its adequacy as a research and clinical tool for testing pragmatics within this population.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study will improve clinical decision making regarding ASD and guide future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"23969415251362626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415251362626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415251362626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:语言病理学家积极参与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童语用学评估。然而,在葡萄牙,缺乏有效和可靠的工具来详细评估这一领域。因此,它被认为是相关的,有助于在该人群中验证Escala de avalia o de Competências communicativas (EAC)(沟通技能评估量表)。方法:采用横断面描述性相关研究。样本包括97名儿童,年龄在4到7岁11个月之间,被诊断为ASD,母语为欧洲葡萄牙语。同时定义智力发育障碍作为排除标准。通过计算Cronbach’s alpha来分析EAC的内部一致性,通过计算类内相关系数来分析重测信度。采用Spearman相关系数分析收敛效度。结果:EAC具有较高的内部一致性值,Cronbach’s alpha为0.956。测试-重测信度分析(n = 27)显示参与者在两个评估时刻的反应具有良好的稳定性,ICC值在0.642和0.842之间变化。在趋同效度的研究中,EAC总分与葡萄牙语版优势与困难问卷(SDQ-Por)的两个量表:同事关系问题(rs = -0.273;p s = 0.606;结论:EAC对ASD儿童具有良好的信度和效度,表明其作为一种研究和临床工具在该人群中测试语用学是适当的。意义:本研究将改善自闭症谱系障碍的临床决策,指导未来的研究。
Communicative Skills Assessment Scale: Contributions to the Validation of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Background and aims: Speech-language pathologists actively participate in the assessment of pragmatics in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, in Portugal, there is a shortage of valid and reliable instruments to assess this domain in detail. Therefore, it was deemed relevant to help validate the Escala de Avaliação de Competências Comunicativas (EAC) (Communicative Skills Assessment Scale) in this population.
Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted. The sample included 97 children, aged between 4 and 7 years and 11 months, diagnosed with ASD with European Portuguese as their native language. As an exclusion criterion, the co-occurrence of intellectual developmental disorder was defined. The internal consistency of the EAC was analyzed through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Convergent validity was also analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Results: The EAC presented a high internal consistency value, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 27) revealed good stability in the participants' responses at both assessment moments, with ICC values varying between 0.642 and 0.842. In the study of convergent validity, statistically significant correlations were observed between the EAC total score and the two scales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Portuguese Version (SDQ-Por): relationship problems with colleagues (rs = -0.273; p < .01) and prosocial behavior (rs = 0.606; p < .01).
Conclusion: The EAC presents good reliability and validity for children with ASD, suggesting its adequacy as a research and clinical tool for testing pragmatics within this population.
Implications: This study will improve clinical decision making regarding ASD and guide future research.