利用结合输尿管镜压力反馈的原型液体管理系统改善肾盂压力控制。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts
{"title":"利用结合输尿管镜压力反馈的原型液体管理系统改善肾盂压力控制。","authors":"Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (P<sub>RP</sub>) below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize P<sub>RP</sub> in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (R<sub>OUT</sub>) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. With pFMS irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> remained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O as R<sub>OUT</sub> was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased as irrigation pressure increased and as R<sub>OUT</sub> increased. For example, when R<sub>OUT</sub> was 2.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> was 37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with both 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher R<sub>OUT</sub> values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH<sub>2</sub>O respectively with 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control P<sub>RP</sub> and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved control of renal pelvis pressure using a prototype fluid management system incorporating ureteroscope pressure feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (P<sub>RP</sub>) below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize P<sub>RP</sub> in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (R<sub>OUT</sub>) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. With pFMS irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> remained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O as R<sub>OUT</sub> was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased as irrigation pressure increased and as R<sub>OUT</sub> increased. For example, when R<sub>OUT</sub> was 2.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> was 37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with both 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher R<sub>OUT</sub> values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH<sub>2</sub>O respectively with 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control P<sub>RP</sub> and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

输尿管镜检查时,最好将肾盂压(PRP)维持在40cmh20以下(肾盂静脉回流阈值),以减少感染并发症和术后疼痛的风险。当使用基于压力反馈调节流量的流体管理系统(pFMS)原型时,我们试图在硅胶肾输尿管模型中表征PRP。这些结果与常规加压灌溉在五个流出阻力(ROUT)值下进行了比较。将LithoVue™Elite输尿管镜插入硅胶肾输尿管模型,其尖端位于肾盂。从pFMS中进行灌水,压力限制设置为40 cmH2O,或者从传统的压力灌溉中进行50、75、100、125或150 cmH2O的灌水。使用pFMS灌溉,平均PRP保持在40 cmH2O以下,ROUT分别从0.9 cmH2O/(ml/min)增加到4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min)。在常规加压灌溉条件下,平均PRP随灌溉压力的增大和ROUT的增大而增大。例如,当ROUT为2.0 cmH2O/(ml/min)时,常规灌溉压力和pFMS均为125 cmH2O,平均PRP为37 cmH2O。然而,当ROUT值为2.9、4.0和4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min)时,常规灌溉压力为125 cmH2O时,平均PRP分别增加到47、57和60 cmH2O,而pFMS则维持在40 cmH2O以下。基于压力反馈的灌洗自动调节是控制PRP的有效方法,可以降低感染并发症和术后疼痛的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved control of renal pelvis pressure using a prototype fluid management system incorporating ureteroscope pressure feedback.

During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (PRP) below 40 cmH2O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize PRP in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (ROUT) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH2O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH2O. With pFMS irrigation, mean PRP remained below 40 cmH2O as ROUT was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean PRP increased as irrigation pressure increased and as ROUT increased. For example, when ROUT was 2.0 cmH2O/(ml/min), mean PRP was 37 cmH2O with both 125 cmH2O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher ROUT values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min), mean PRP increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH2O respectively with 125 cmH2O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH2O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control PRP and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信