Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts
{"title":"利用结合输尿管镜压力反馈的原型液体管理系统改善肾盂压力控制。","authors":"Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (P<sub>RP</sub>) below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize P<sub>RP</sub> in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (R<sub>OUT</sub>) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. With pFMS irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> remained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O as R<sub>OUT</sub> was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased as irrigation pressure increased and as R<sub>OUT</sub> increased. For example, when R<sub>OUT</sub> was 2.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> was 37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with both 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher R<sub>OUT</sub> values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH<sub>2</sub>O respectively with 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control P<sub>RP</sub> and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved control of renal pelvis pressure using a prototype fluid management system incorporating ureteroscope pressure feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Leilane Glienke, Anthony F Bonzagni, Timothy L Hall, Khurshid R Ghani, William W Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (P<sub>RP</sub>) below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize P<sub>RP</sub> in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (R<sub>OUT</sub>) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. With pFMS irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> remained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O as R<sub>OUT</sub> was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased as irrigation pressure increased and as R<sub>OUT</sub> increased. For example, when R<sub>OUT</sub> was 2.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> was 37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with both 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher R<sub>OUT</sub> values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/(ml/min), mean P<sub>RP</sub> increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH<sub>2</sub>O respectively with 125 cmH<sub>2</sub>O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH<sub>2</sub>O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control P<sub>RP</sub> and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01815-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved control of renal pelvis pressure using a prototype fluid management system incorporating ureteroscope pressure feedback.
During ureteroscopy it is desirable to maintain renal pelvis pressure (PRP) below 40 cmH2O - the threshold for pyelovenous backflow - to decrease risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain. We sought to characterize PRP in a silicone kidney ureter model when using a prototype fluid management system (pFMS) that adjusts flowrate based on pressure feedback. These results were compared to conventional pressurized irrigation at five outflow resistance (ROUT) values. A LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope was inserted into a silicone kidney ureter model with its tip in the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered from the pFMS with pressure limiter set to 40 cmH2O or from conventional pressurized irrigation at 50, 75, 100, 125, or 150 cmH2O. With pFMS irrigation, mean PRP remained below 40 cmH2O as ROUT was incremented from 0.9 to 4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min) respectively. With conventional pressurized irrigation, mean PRP increased as irrigation pressure increased and as ROUT increased. For example, when ROUT was 2.0 cmH2O/(ml/min), mean PRP was 37 cmH2O with both 125 cmH2O conventional irrigation pressure and pFMS. However, with higher ROUT values of 2.9, 4.0, and 4.9 cmH2O/(ml/min), mean PRP increased to 47, 57, and 60 cmH2O respectively with 125 cmH2O conventional irrigation pressure but was maintained below 40 cmH2O with the pFMS. Automated adjustment of irrigation based on pressure feedback is an effective way to control PRP and may reduce risk of infectious complications and postoperative pain.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.