全球外来入侵植物管理清单:评估当前做法并适应新的需求。

IF 6.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Diversity Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.002
Fei-Fei Li, Qiang Hao, Xia Cui, Ruo-Zhu Lin, Bin-Sheng Luo, Jin-Shuang Ma
{"title":"全球外来入侵植物管理清单:评估当前做法并适应新的需求。","authors":"Fei-Fei Li, Qiang Hao, Xia Cui, Ruo-Zhu Lin, Bin-Sheng Luo, Jin-Shuang Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive alien species (IAS) significantly threaten global biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Despite increasing management efforts, a critical knowledge gap existed in understanding commonalities and disparities among national strategies. We analyzed several IAS management lists from 23 countries and the European Union, focusing specifically on vascular plant species within these lists. List composition, characteristics, and associated management measures were analyzed. Key patterns in species prioritization across national lists and intercontinental exchange of invasive alien plants (IAPs) were identified. <i>Pistia stratiotes</i>, <i>Pontederia crassipes</i>, <i>Salvinia molesta</i>, <i>Cabomba caroliniana</i>, <i>Ulex europaeus</i> were identified as globally recognized threats, being listed by at least 33.3% of analyzed countries and invading five or more continents. Aquatic plants were found to be more frequently included in management lists. A significant directional invasion pattern between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres was identified. Species native to Asia were observed to dominate as significant donors of IAPs across continents. The analysis of list management strategies highlighted substantial gaps in achieving Target 6 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in species prioritization and inclusion of potential IAPs. In response to these challenges, a tiered classification system for invasive alien species list was proposed, encompassing High-Priority, Watchlist, Potential, and Priority Site categories, which aimed at enhancing management effectiveness by tailoring strategies to different invasion stages and ecological contexts. This study could contribute to understanding global IAPs management strategies and serve as a reference for policymakers and conservation managers to identify priority IAPs and refine management approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"47 4","pages":"666-680"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12302625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global invasive alien plant management lists: Assessing current practices and adapting to new demands.\",\"authors\":\"Fei-Fei Li, Qiang Hao, Xia Cui, Ruo-Zhu Lin, Bin-Sheng Luo, Jin-Shuang Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Invasive alien species (IAS) significantly threaten global biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Despite increasing management efforts, a critical knowledge gap existed in understanding commonalities and disparities among national strategies. We analyzed several IAS management lists from 23 countries and the European Union, focusing specifically on vascular plant species within these lists. List composition, characteristics, and associated management measures were analyzed. Key patterns in species prioritization across national lists and intercontinental exchange of invasive alien plants (IAPs) were identified. <i>Pistia stratiotes</i>, <i>Pontederia crassipes</i>, <i>Salvinia molesta</i>, <i>Cabomba caroliniana</i>, <i>Ulex europaeus</i> were identified as globally recognized threats, being listed by at least 33.3% of analyzed countries and invading five or more continents. Aquatic plants were found to be more frequently included in management lists. A significant directional invasion pattern between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres was identified. Species native to Asia were observed to dominate as significant donors of IAPs across continents. The analysis of list management strategies highlighted substantial gaps in achieving Target 6 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in species prioritization and inclusion of potential IAPs. In response to these challenges, a tiered classification system for invasive alien species list was proposed, encompassing High-Priority, Watchlist, Potential, and Priority Site categories, which aimed at enhancing management effectiveness by tailoring strategies to different invasion stages and ecological contexts. This study could contribute to understanding global IAPs management strategies and serve as a reference for policymakers and conservation managers to identify priority IAPs and refine management approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Diversity\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"666-680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12302625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Diversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.11.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外来入侵物种严重威胁着全球生物多样性和生态系统的稳定。尽管管理工作不断加强,但在了解各国战略的共性和差异方面存在着重大的知识差距。我们分析了来自23个国家和欧盟的IAS管理清单,特别关注这些清单中的维管植物物种。分析了清单组成、特征及相关管理措施。确定了外来入侵植物国家名录和洲际交换中物种优先排序的关键模式。被分析的国家中,至少有33.3%的国家将其列为全球公认的威胁,并入侵了5个或更多大洲。水生植物被列入管理清单的频率更高。确定了东半球和西半球之间明显的定向入侵模式。亚洲原生物种作为各大洲间iap的重要供给者占主导地位。对清单管理策略的分析表明,在实现《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》目标6方面存在巨大差距,特别是在物种优先排序和潜在iap的纳入方面。针对这些挑战,提出了一种包括高优先级、观察级、潜在级和优先级的外来入侵物种分类系统,旨在通过针对不同入侵阶段和生态环境的定制策略来提高管理效率。本研究有助于了解全球生态保护措施的管理策略,为决策者和保护管理者确定优先生态保护措施和完善生态保护措施提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global invasive alien plant management lists: Assessing current practices and adapting to new demands.

Invasive alien species (IAS) significantly threaten global biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Despite increasing management efforts, a critical knowledge gap existed in understanding commonalities and disparities among national strategies. We analyzed several IAS management lists from 23 countries and the European Union, focusing specifically on vascular plant species within these lists. List composition, characteristics, and associated management measures were analyzed. Key patterns in species prioritization across national lists and intercontinental exchange of invasive alien plants (IAPs) were identified. Pistia stratiotes, Pontederia crassipes, Salvinia molesta, Cabomba caroliniana, Ulex europaeus were identified as globally recognized threats, being listed by at least 33.3% of analyzed countries and invading five or more continents. Aquatic plants were found to be more frequently included in management lists. A significant directional invasion pattern between the Eastern and Western Hemispheres was identified. Species native to Asia were observed to dominate as significant donors of IAPs across continents. The analysis of list management strategies highlighted substantial gaps in achieving Target 6 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in species prioritization and inclusion of potential IAPs. In response to these challenges, a tiered classification system for invasive alien species list was proposed, encompassing High-Priority, Watchlist, Potential, and Priority Site categories, which aimed at enhancing management effectiveness by tailoring strategies to different invasion stages and ecological contexts. This study could contribute to understanding global IAPs management strategies and serve as a reference for policymakers and conservation managers to identify priority IAPs and refine management approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Diversity
Plant Diversity Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants, contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications, present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists. While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance. Fields covered by the journal include: plant systematics and taxonomy- evolutionary developmental biology- reproductive biology- phylo- and biogeography- evolutionary ecology- population biology- conservation biology- palaeobotany- molecular evolution- comparative and evolutionary genomics- physiology- biochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信