健康家庭研究:经济适用住房中基于场所的无烟家庭干预的集群随机试验协议。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328786
Mark R Hawes, Deepalika Chakravarty, Jing Cheng, Margaret A Handley, Janice Y Tsoh, Tracy Kuo Lin, Robert A Hiatt, Maya Vijayaraghavan
{"title":"健康家庭研究:经济适用住房中基于场所的无烟家庭干预的集群随机试验协议。","authors":"Mark R Hawes, Deepalika Chakravarty, Jing Cheng, Margaret A Handley, Janice Y Tsoh, Tracy Kuo Lin, Robert A Hiatt, Maya Vijayaraghavan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comprehensive clean air policies reduce exposure to secondhand tobacco and cannabis smoke, as well as nicotine aerosols, and improve health outcomes. However, these policies often do not apply to the eight million residents of multiunit affordable housing, many of whom are from minoritized populations. One strategy to promote smoke-free living environments is to increase the voluntary adoption of no-smoking rules in the home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the protocol for the Healthy Homes study-a wait-list cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention for affordable housing residents. The intervention was adapted from a prior version using the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Behavior Change Wheel. We will enroll 544 residents at 48 affordable housing sites across Northern California. Sites will be randomized to intervention or wait-list control. Resident participants will receive a one-hour coaching session on how to adopt a smoke-free home. Housing staff will be trained as lay health workers to provide brief cessation coaching. Residents and staff will complete follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. The intervention will be delivered in English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Vietnamese. The primary resident outcome is voluntary adoption of a smoke-free home for 90 days or more at 6 months. The secondary outcome is carbon monoxide-verified point prevalence tobacco abstinence. For lay health workers, the primary outcome is change in Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices scores. We will assess cost-effectiveness and use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate implementation outcomes, including characteristics of successful adopters and multilevel drivers of behavior change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding access to smoke-free affordable housing is critical for reducing racial and ethnic health inequities. This study has the potential to support voluntary smoke-free home adoption, increase quitting, and reduce secondhand smoke exposure among affordable housing residents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06170437.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Healthy Homes Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a place-based smoke-free home intervention in affordable housing.\",\"authors\":\"Mark R Hawes, Deepalika Chakravarty, Jing Cheng, Margaret A Handley, Janice Y Tsoh, Tracy Kuo Lin, Robert A Hiatt, Maya Vijayaraghavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0328786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comprehensive clean air policies reduce exposure to secondhand tobacco and cannabis smoke, as well as nicotine aerosols, and improve health outcomes. However, these policies often do not apply to the eight million residents of multiunit affordable housing, many of whom are from minoritized populations. One strategy to promote smoke-free living environments is to increase the voluntary adoption of no-smoking rules in the home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the protocol for the Healthy Homes study-a wait-list cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention for affordable housing residents. The intervention was adapted from a prior version using the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Behavior Change Wheel. We will enroll 544 residents at 48 affordable housing sites across Northern California. Sites will be randomized to intervention or wait-list control. Resident participants will receive a one-hour coaching session on how to adopt a smoke-free home. Housing staff will be trained as lay health workers to provide brief cessation coaching. Residents and staff will complete follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. The intervention will be delivered in English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Vietnamese. The primary resident outcome is voluntary adoption of a smoke-free home for 90 days or more at 6 months. The secondary outcome is carbon monoxide-verified point prevalence tobacco abstinence. For lay health workers, the primary outcome is change in Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices scores. We will assess cost-effectiveness and use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate implementation outcomes, including characteristics of successful adopters and multilevel drivers of behavior change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Expanding access to smoke-free affordable housing is critical for reducing racial and ethnic health inequities. This study has the potential to support voluntary smoke-free home adoption, increase quitting, and reduce secondhand smoke exposure among affordable housing residents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06170437.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0328786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:全面的清洁空气政策减少了二手烟草和大麻烟雾以及尼古丁气溶胶的暴露,并改善了健康结果。然而,这些政策往往不适用于800万多套经济适用房的居民,其中许多人来自少数民族。促进无烟生活环境的一项战略是增加在家中自愿采用禁烟规定。方法:我们描述了健康之家研究的方案,这是一项针对经济适用房居民的无烟家庭干预的等候名单随机对照试验。该干预措施采用能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型和行为改变轮的先前版本。我们将在北加州的48个经济适用房地点招募544名居民。试验点将随机分为干预组和等候组。居民参与者将接受一个小时的指导课程,学习如何建立一个无烟的家庭。住房工作人员将被培训为非专业卫生工作者,提供简短的戒烟指导。住院医师和工作人员将在3个月和6个月时完成随访。干预将以英语、西班牙语、中文(普通话和广东话)和越南语提供。主要居民结果是在6个月时自愿在无烟家庭生活90天或更长时间。次要结果是经一氧化碳验证的点流行烟草戒断。对于非专业卫生工作者,主要结果是吸烟知识、态度和行为得分的变化。我们将评估成本效益,并使用实施研究综合框架来评估实施结果,包括成功采用者的特征和行为变化的多层次驱动因素。讨论:扩大获得无烟负担得起的住房的机会对于减少种族和族裔卫生不平等至关重要。这项研究有可能支持自愿无烟家庭收养,增加戒烟,并减少经济适用房居民的二手烟暴露。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06170437。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Healthy Homes Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a place-based smoke-free home intervention in affordable housing.

Introduction: Comprehensive clean air policies reduce exposure to secondhand tobacco and cannabis smoke, as well as nicotine aerosols, and improve health outcomes. However, these policies often do not apply to the eight million residents of multiunit affordable housing, many of whom are from minoritized populations. One strategy to promote smoke-free living environments is to increase the voluntary adoption of no-smoking rules in the home.

Methods: We describe the protocol for the Healthy Homes study-a wait-list cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention for affordable housing residents. The intervention was adapted from a prior version using the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Behavior Change Wheel. We will enroll 544 residents at 48 affordable housing sites across Northern California. Sites will be randomized to intervention or wait-list control. Resident participants will receive a one-hour coaching session on how to adopt a smoke-free home. Housing staff will be trained as lay health workers to provide brief cessation coaching. Residents and staff will complete follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. The intervention will be delivered in English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Vietnamese. The primary resident outcome is voluntary adoption of a smoke-free home for 90 days or more at 6 months. The secondary outcome is carbon monoxide-verified point prevalence tobacco abstinence. For lay health workers, the primary outcome is change in Smoking Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices scores. We will assess cost-effectiveness and use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate implementation outcomes, including characteristics of successful adopters and multilevel drivers of behavior change.

Discussion: Expanding access to smoke-free affordable housing is critical for reducing racial and ethnic health inequities. This study has the potential to support voluntary smoke-free home adoption, increase quitting, and reduce secondhand smoke exposure among affordable housing residents.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06170437.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信