停用螺内酯治疗心力衰竭并改善射血分数:一项开放标签、先导、随机对照试验(含hf试验)。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Junho Hyun, Seung-Ah Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Jung Ae Hong, Min-Seok Kim, Jae-Joong Kim
{"title":"停用螺内酯治疗心力衰竭并改善射血分数:一项开放标签、先导、随机对照试验(含hf试验)。","authors":"Junho Hyun, Seung-Ah Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Jung Ae Hong, Min-Seok Kim, Jae-Joong Kim","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2025.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal strategy for the maintenance or discontinuation of evidence-based medication is unclear in heart failure (HF) patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We tested the feasibility and safety of withdrawing mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an open-label, prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial including HF patients whose LVEF improved from ≤35% to ≥50% after guideline-directed medical therapy. While testing withdrawal of MRA, other medications were maintained. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing deteriorations in LVEF by ≥10% at 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were numerical changes in echocardiographic parameters, changes in blood natriuretic peptide levels, and adverse clinical events relevant to HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomly assigned 62 HF patients with improved LVEF to the withdrawal or continuation groups. Two (6.7%) patients in the withdrawal group and one (3.2%) patient in the continuation group showed deterioration in LVEF by ≥10% at 6 months; one of the 2 patients in the withdrawal group who showed a decline in LVEF had LVEF of less than 50% at follow-up. Re-initiation of MRA did not occur in any patients. Compared with baseline, echocardiographic parameters, including LV end-diastolic volume index, global longitudinal strain, and natriuretic peptides, were similar at follow-up in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRA withdrawal was associated with a low risk of significant deterioration of cardiac function in HF patients with improved LVEF of ≥50%. MRA withdrawal may be feasible and safe in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04367051.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Withdrawal of Spironolactone for Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: An Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial (With-HF Trial).\",\"authors\":\"Junho Hyun, Seung-Ah Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Jung Ae Hong, Min-Seok Kim, Jae-Joong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4070/kcj.2025.0052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The optimal strategy for the maintenance or discontinuation of evidence-based medication is unclear in heart failure (HF) patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We tested the feasibility and safety of withdrawing mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an open-label, prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial including HF patients whose LVEF improved from ≤35% to ≥50% after guideline-directed medical therapy. While testing withdrawal of MRA, other medications were maintained. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing deteriorations in LVEF by ≥10% at 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were numerical changes in echocardiographic parameters, changes in blood natriuretic peptide levels, and adverse clinical events relevant to HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomly assigned 62 HF patients with improved LVEF to the withdrawal or continuation groups. Two (6.7%) patients in the withdrawal group and one (3.2%) patient in the continuation group showed deterioration in LVEF by ≥10% at 6 months; one of the 2 patients in the withdrawal group who showed a decline in LVEF had LVEF of less than 50% at follow-up. Re-initiation of MRA did not occur in any patients. Compared with baseline, echocardiographic parameters, including LV end-diastolic volume index, global longitudinal strain, and natriuretic peptides, were similar at follow-up in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRA withdrawal was associated with a low risk of significant deterioration of cardiac function in HF patients with improved LVEF of ≥50%. MRA withdrawal may be feasible and safe in this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04367051.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2025.0052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2025.0052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:对于左室射血分数(LVEF)改善的心力衰竭(HF)患者,维持或停止循证药物治疗的最佳策略尚不清楚。我们在该人群中测试了停用矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)的可行性和安全性。方法:这是一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机对照的先导试验,纳入经指导药物治疗后LVEF从≤35%改善至≥50%的HF患者。在测试MRA停药时,维持其他药物治疗。主要终点是6个月随访时LVEF恶化≥10%的患者比例。次要终点是超声心动图参数的数值变化、血利钠肽水平的变化以及与心衰相关的不良临床事件。结果:我们随机将62例LVEF改善的HF患者分为停药组或继续组。停药组2例(6.7%)患者和继续组1例(3.2%)患者在6个月时LVEF恶化≥10%;停药组2例患者中有1例LVEF下降,随访时LVEF低于50%。没有任何患者出现MRA的重新启动。与基线相比,超声心动图参数,包括左室舒张末期容积指数、总纵向应变和利钠肽,在随访中两组相似。结论:在LVEF改善≥50%的HF患者中,MRA停药与心功能显著恶化的低风险相关。在这一人群中,MRA的停药可能是可行和安全的。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04367051。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Withdrawal of Spironolactone for Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: An Open-Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial (With-HF Trial).

Background and objectives: The optimal strategy for the maintenance or discontinuation of evidence-based medication is unclear in heart failure (HF) patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We tested the feasibility and safety of withdrawing mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this population.

Methods: This is an open-label, prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial including HF patients whose LVEF improved from ≤35% to ≥50% after guideline-directed medical therapy. While testing withdrawal of MRA, other medications were maintained. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients showing deteriorations in LVEF by ≥10% at 6-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were numerical changes in echocardiographic parameters, changes in blood natriuretic peptide levels, and adverse clinical events relevant to HF.

Results: We randomly assigned 62 HF patients with improved LVEF to the withdrawal or continuation groups. Two (6.7%) patients in the withdrawal group and one (3.2%) patient in the continuation group showed deterioration in LVEF by ≥10% at 6 months; one of the 2 patients in the withdrawal group who showed a decline in LVEF had LVEF of less than 50% at follow-up. Re-initiation of MRA did not occur in any patients. Compared with baseline, echocardiographic parameters, including LV end-diastolic volume index, global longitudinal strain, and natriuretic peptides, were similar at follow-up in both groups.

Conclusions: MRA withdrawal was associated with a low risk of significant deterioration of cardiac function in HF patients with improved LVEF of ≥50%. MRA withdrawal may be feasible and safe in this population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04367051.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Circulation Journal
Korean Circulation Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
17.20%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''. Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular. The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信