Munachiso Iheme Ndukwe, Matteo Pavone, Dominik Habes, Nicolo Bizzarri, Martin Stepan, Petra Bretová, Floriana Mascilini, Dominik Karasek, Denisa Pohankova, Akaninyene Ubom, Jana Marie Havigerova, Jiri Haviger, Igor Sirak
{"title":"超声引导下真切活检在卵巢癌中的作用：对其安全性、充分性和准确性进行系统评价，并对诊断性能进行meta分析。","authors":"Munachiso Iheme Ndukwe, Matteo Pavone, Dominik Habes, Nicolo Bizzarri, Martin Stepan, Petra Bretová, Floriana Mascilini, Dominik Karasek, Denisa Pohankova, Akaninyene Ubom, Jana Marie Havigerova, Jiri Haviger, Igor Sirak","doi":"10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the safety, adequacy and accuracy of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted through June 2024. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included in the review. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting complete 2 × 2 diagnostic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,250 articles were initially screened, and after the removal of duplicates, 54 articles were deemed eligible for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 18 studies, comprising 1,867 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy, were included in the systematic review. A total of 16 complications were reported across 1,898 biopsies performed in the included studies, resulting in a mean complication rate of 0.58% (95% CI: 0.187- 0.964%). Adequacy for histological and immunohistochemical examination after one attempt was reported in 16 studies, with a mean adequacy rate of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.69- 97.50%) and a median rate of 95.97%. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in 13 studies, revealing a mean diagnostic accuracy of 95.54% (95% CI: 93.19- 97.89%) and a median of 97.48%.In the meta-analysis of 10 studies, pooled sensitivity was 98.6%, specificity 41.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 47.2%, with high heterogeneity observed in specificity and NPV estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method, demonstrating a high adequacy rate for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. It shows excellent performance in confirming malignancy and supports preoperative decision making. To further define its role in the diagnostic pathway for ovarian cancer, additional prospective multicenter studies are needed-both to validate its reliability in negative cases and to ensure tissue adequacy for advanced molecular testing in the context of personalized medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of its safety, adequacy, and accuracy with meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.\",\"authors\":\"Munachiso Iheme Ndukwe, Matteo Pavone, Dominik Habes, Nicolo Bizzarri, Martin Stepan, Petra Bretová, Floriana Mascilini, Dominik Karasek, Denisa Pohankova, Akaninyene Ubom, Jana Marie Havigerova, Jiri Haviger, Igor Sirak\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the safety, adequacy and accuracy of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted through June 2024. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included in the review. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting complete 2 × 2 diagnostic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,250 articles were initially screened, and after the removal of duplicates, 54 articles were deemed eligible for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 18 studies, comprising 1,867 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy, were included in the systematic review. A total of 16 complications were reported across 1,898 biopsies performed in the included studies, resulting in a mean complication rate of 0.58% (95% CI: 0.187- 0.964%). Adequacy for histological and immunohistochemical examination after one attempt was reported in 16 studies, with a mean adequacy rate of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.69- 97.50%) and a median rate of 95.97%. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in 13 studies, revealing a mean diagnostic accuracy of 95.54% (95% CI: 93.19- 97.89%) and a median of 97.48%.In the meta-analysis of 10 studies, pooled sensitivity was 98.6%, specificity 41.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 47.2%, with high heterogeneity observed in specificity and NPV estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method, demonstrating a high adequacy rate for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. It shows excellent performance in confirming malignancy and supports preoperative decision making. To further define its role in the diagnostic pathway for ovarian cancer, additional prospective multicenter studies are needed-both to validate its reliability in negative cases and to ensure tissue adequacy for advanced molecular testing in the context of personalized medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01739-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of its safety, adequacy, and accuracy with meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.
Objectives: To analyze the safety, adequacy and accuracy of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted through June 2024. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included in the review. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting complete 2 × 2 diagnostic data.
Results: A total of 2,250 articles were initially screened, and after the removal of duplicates, 54 articles were deemed eligible for full-text assessment. Ultimately, 18 studies, comprising 1,867 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy, were included in the systematic review. A total of 16 complications were reported across 1,898 biopsies performed in the included studies, resulting in a mean complication rate of 0.58% (95% CI: 0.187- 0.964%). Adequacy for histological and immunohistochemical examination after one attempt was reported in 16 studies, with a mean adequacy rate of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.69- 97.50%) and a median rate of 95.97%. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in 13 studies, revealing a mean diagnostic accuracy of 95.54% (95% CI: 93.19- 97.89%) and a median of 97.48%.In the meta-analysis of 10 studies, pooled sensitivity was 98.6%, specificity 41.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 47.2%, with high heterogeneity observed in specificity and NPV estimates.
Conclusions: Ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method, demonstrating a high adequacy rate for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. It shows excellent performance in confirming malignancy and supports preoperative decision making. To further define its role in the diagnostic pathway for ovarian cancer, additional prospective multicenter studies are needed-both to validate its reliability in negative cases and to ensure tissue adequacy for advanced molecular testing in the context of personalized medicine.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ.
Topical areas include, but are not restricted to:
Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation
Follicle growth and ovulation
Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome
Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones
Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment
Drug development and screening
Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
