人工智能和机器学习在退行性颈椎病患者管理中的应用:系统综述。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vikas N Vattipally, Ritvik R Jillala, Carlos A Aude, Arjun K Menta, Jacob Jo, Liam P Hughes, Jawad M Khalifeh, Tej D Azad
{"title":"人工智能和机器学习在退行性颈椎病患者管理中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Vikas N Vattipally, Ritvik R Jillala, Carlos A Aude, Arjun K Menta, Jacob Jo, Liam P Hughes, Jawad M Khalifeh, Tej D Azad","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06504-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a debilitating condition caused by compression of the spinal cord. Despite established surgical treatments, accurate diagnosis and prognostication remain challenging in part due to the variability in clinical presentation and lack of screening tools. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges through its predictive capabilities for diagnosis, decision-making, and prognostication. Given the recent advent of ML, there is a need to systematically synthesize its applications to the treatment of patients with DCM.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science) in November 2024 and included studies employing predictive ML techniques among a population of patients with DCM. Studies primarily focused on ML applications to neuroimaging were excluded. Variables such as study focus, number of patients with DCM, and ML approaches used were extracted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Thirty full-text studies were included in this review. These studies encompassed 11,407 patients, with 84% (N.=9615) holding a diagnosis of DCM. Most studies (N.=16, 53%) used ML to predict outcomes for patients with DCM, including functional recovery, quality-of-life, and postoperative complications. Thirteen studies (43%) focused on the diagnosis of DCM using ML-augmented screening tools, and the remaining study focused on surgical decision-making. Support vector machine was the most used ML approach (N.=14 studies, 47%) followed by random forest (N.=8 studies, 27%). Throughout the studies included, ML algorithm predictions were demonstrated to outperform traditional statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models are a promising step forward for diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and prognostication for patients with DCM. Further validation in large, multi-institutional cohorts is needed to help improve translatability to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Vikas N Vattipally, Ritvik R Jillala, Carlos A Aude, Arjun K Menta, Jacob Jo, Liam P Hughes, Jawad M Khalifeh, Tej D Azad\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06504-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a debilitating condition caused by compression of the spinal cord. Despite established surgical treatments, accurate diagnosis and prognostication remain challenging in part due to the variability in clinical presentation and lack of screening tools. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges through its predictive capabilities for diagnosis, decision-making, and prognostication. Given the recent advent of ML, there is a need to systematically synthesize its applications to the treatment of patients with DCM.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science) in November 2024 and included studies employing predictive ML techniques among a population of patients with DCM. Studies primarily focused on ML applications to neuroimaging were excluded. Variables such as study focus, number of patients with DCM, and ML approaches used were extracted.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Thirty full-text studies were included in this review. These studies encompassed 11,407 patients, with 84% (N.=9615) holding a diagnosis of DCM. Most studies (N.=16, 53%) used ML to predict outcomes for patients with DCM, including functional recovery, quality-of-life, and postoperative complications. Thirteen studies (43%) focused on the diagnosis of DCM using ML-augmented screening tools, and the remaining study focused on surgical decision-making. Support vector machine was the most used ML approach (N.=14 studies, 47%) followed by random forest (N.=8 studies, 27%). Throughout the studies included, ML algorithm predictions were demonstrated to outperform traditional statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models are a promising step forward for diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and prognostication for patients with DCM. Further validation in large, multi-institutional cohorts is needed to help improve translatability to clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06504-X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06504-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:退行性颈椎病(DCM)是一种由脊髓压迫引起的衰弱性疾病。尽管已有手术治疗,但由于临床表现的差异和缺乏筛查工具,准确的诊断和预后仍然具有挑战性。机器学习(ML)通过其在诊断、决策和预测方面的预测能力,已经成为解决这些挑战的一种有前途的方法。鉴于最近ML的出现,有必要系统地综合其在DCM患者治疗中的应用。证据获取:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。我们于2024年11月检索了五个数据库(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science),并纳入了在DCM患者群体中使用预测ML技术的研究。主要关注机器学习在神经影像学中的应用的研究被排除在外。提取了研究重点、DCM患者数量和ML入路等变量。证据综合:本综述纳入了30项全文研究。这些研究包括11,407例患者,其中84% (n =9615)诊断为DCM。大多数研究(n =16, 53%)使用ML预测DCM患者的预后,包括功能恢复、生活质量和术后并发症。13项研究(43%)侧重于使用ml增强筛查工具诊断DCM,其余研究侧重于手术决策。支持向量机是最常用的ML方法(n =14, 47%),其次是随机森林(n =8, 27%)。在所有研究中,机器学习算法的预测被证明优于传统的统计方法。结论:ML模型在DCM患者的诊断、临床决策和预后方面是一个有希望的进步。需要在大型多机构队列中进一步验证,以帮助提高临床实践的可翻译性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a debilitating condition caused by compression of the spinal cord. Despite established surgical treatments, accurate diagnosis and prognostication remain challenging in part due to the variability in clinical presentation and lack of screening tools. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges through its predictive capabilities for diagnosis, decision-making, and prognostication. Given the recent advent of ML, there is a need to systematically synthesize its applications to the treatment of patients with DCM.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science) in November 2024 and included studies employing predictive ML techniques among a population of patients with DCM. Studies primarily focused on ML applications to neuroimaging were excluded. Variables such as study focus, number of patients with DCM, and ML approaches used were extracted.

Evidence synthesis: Thirty full-text studies were included in this review. These studies encompassed 11,407 patients, with 84% (N.=9615) holding a diagnosis of DCM. Most studies (N.=16, 53%) used ML to predict outcomes for patients with DCM, including functional recovery, quality-of-life, and postoperative complications. Thirteen studies (43%) focused on the diagnosis of DCM using ML-augmented screening tools, and the remaining study focused on surgical decision-making. Support vector machine was the most used ML approach (N.=14 studies, 47%) followed by random forest (N.=8 studies, 27%). Throughout the studies included, ML algorithm predictions were demonstrated to outperform traditional statistical methods.

Conclusions: ML models are a promising step forward for diagnosis, clinical decision-making, and prognostication for patients with DCM. Further validation in large, multi-institutional cohorts is needed to help improve translatability to clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信