{"title":"临床使用肺部超声急诊和重症监护医生:瑞士全国调查。","authors":"Norah Villars, Thomas Berlet, Luca Cioccari","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about its use, training, indications, and implementation barriers. Therefore, we performed a survey to evaluate the current practice of LUS among ED and ICU physicians with varying experience levels across regions in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 27-question online survey was disseminated across 108 EDs and 75 ICUs using snowball sampling via department heads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all 18 participants from 183 invited departments (49.0% ED physicians, 42.3% ICU physicians, 8.7% from other specialties), 190 (95.5%) use ultrasound and 164 (82.8%) use LUS in their clinical practice. Predominantly, LUS is utilized for evaluating dyspnea (95.9%), shock (76.2%), and hypoxemia (73.5%). ICU physicians used LUS more for invasive procedures, while less experienced physicians had lower certification rates. Standardized protocols for LUS examination or documentation were reported by only 22.5% and 38.9% of responders, respectively. The main barriers identified were time constraints, lack of training opportunities, and underestimation of LUSs diagnostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS is widely adopted and considered highly relevant by ED and ICU physicians. However, disparities in usage and proficiency were observed between ICU and non-ICU physicians, as well as between more and less experienced practitioners. Addressing the identified training gaps and promoting standardized protocol adoption are imperative for optimizing LUSs integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Use of Lung Ultrasound by Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians: A Swiss National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Norah Villars, Thomas Berlet, Luca Cioccari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about its use, training, indications, and implementation barriers. Therefore, we performed a survey to evaluate the current practice of LUS among ED and ICU physicians with varying experience levels across regions in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 27-question online survey was disseminated across 108 EDs and 75 ICUs using snowball sampling via department heads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all 18 participants from 183 invited departments (49.0% ED physicians, 42.3% ICU physicians, 8.7% from other specialties), 190 (95.5%) use ultrasound and 164 (82.8%) use LUS in their clinical practice. Predominantly, LUS is utilized for evaluating dyspnea (95.9%), shock (76.2%), and hypoxemia (73.5%). ICU physicians used LUS more for invasive procedures, while less experienced physicians had lower certification rates. Standardized protocols for LUS examination or documentation were reported by only 22.5% and 38.9% of responders, respectively. The main barriers identified were time constraints, lack of training opportunities, and underestimation of LUSs diagnostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS is widely adopted and considered highly relevant by ED and ICU physicians. However, disparities in usage and proficiency were observed between ICU and non-ICU physicians, as well as between more and less experienced practitioners. Addressing the identified training gaps and promoting standardized protocol adoption are imperative for optimizing LUSs integration into patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Use of Lung Ultrasound by Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians: A Swiss National Survey.
Purpose: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about its use, training, indications, and implementation barriers. Therefore, we performed a survey to evaluate the current practice of LUS among ED and ICU physicians with varying experience levels across regions in Switzerland.
Methods: A 27-question online survey was disseminated across 108 EDs and 75 ICUs using snowball sampling via department heads.
Results: Of all 18 participants from 183 invited departments (49.0% ED physicians, 42.3% ICU physicians, 8.7% from other specialties), 190 (95.5%) use ultrasound and 164 (82.8%) use LUS in their clinical practice. Predominantly, LUS is utilized for evaluating dyspnea (95.9%), shock (76.2%), and hypoxemia (73.5%). ICU physicians used LUS more for invasive procedures, while less experienced physicians had lower certification rates. Standardized protocols for LUS examination or documentation were reported by only 22.5% and 38.9% of responders, respectively. The main barriers identified were time constraints, lack of training opportunities, and underestimation of LUSs diagnostic value.
Conclusions: LUS is widely adopted and considered highly relevant by ED and ICU physicians. However, disparities in usage and proficiency were observed between ICU and non-ICU physicians, as well as between more and less experienced practitioners. Addressing the identified training gaps and promoting standardized protocol adoption are imperative for optimizing LUSs integration into patient care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.