粉红噪音和纯音都能降低成人多动症特征升高的1/f神经噪音:对中度脑觉醒模型的批判性评价。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Joske Rijmen, Mehdi Senoussi, Jan R Wiersema
{"title":"粉红噪音和纯音都能降低成人多动症特征升高的1/f神经噪音:对中度脑觉醒模型的批判性评价。","authors":"Joske Rijmen, Mehdi Senoussi, Jan R Wiersema","doi":"10.1177/10870547251357074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The moderate brain arousal (MBA) model posits that individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD have lower levels of neural noise and that auditory random noise can elicit stochastic resonance (SR) and increase neural noise, which improves their cognitive performance. Indeed, research shows that auditory random noise, such as white noise, improves cognitive performance in individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD. However, the assumptions regarding neural noise in ADHD and the requirement of SR have been insufficiently examined due to a lack of studies incorporating both a second non-random auditory condition and an index of neural noise. Therefore, 69 neurotypical adults completed the ASRS to assess ADHD traits and underwent eyes-closed resting-state EEG, subdivided into three 2-min blocks: silence, continuous auditory pink noise (a random signal), and a continuous 100 Hz pure tone (a non-random signal). We then analyzed the aperiodic slope of the EEG power spectral density, a proposed direct measure of neural noise. Pink noise affected the aperiodic slope differently based on ADHD traits; specifically, it increased the slope in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, indicating a decrease in neural noise. Crucially, the same effect was observed for the pure tone. These findings challenge the MBA model by demonstrating that both random (pink noise) and non-random (pure tone) signals reduce neural noise in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, contradicting the proposed mechanism of stochastic resonance, as well as the direction of effects suggested by the MBA model. These findings warrant further investigation, also in a clinical ADHD sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547251357074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pink Noise and a Pure Tone Both Reduce 1/<i>f</i> Neural Noise in Adults With Elevated ADHD Traits: A Critical Appraisal of the Moderate Brain Arousal Model.\",\"authors\":\"Joske Rijmen, Mehdi Senoussi, Jan R Wiersema\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10870547251357074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The moderate brain arousal (MBA) model posits that individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD have lower levels of neural noise and that auditory random noise can elicit stochastic resonance (SR) and increase neural noise, which improves their cognitive performance. Indeed, research shows that auditory random noise, such as white noise, improves cognitive performance in individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD. However, the assumptions regarding neural noise in ADHD and the requirement of SR have been insufficiently examined due to a lack of studies incorporating both a second non-random auditory condition and an index of neural noise. Therefore, 69 neurotypical adults completed the ASRS to assess ADHD traits and underwent eyes-closed resting-state EEG, subdivided into three 2-min blocks: silence, continuous auditory pink noise (a random signal), and a continuous 100 Hz pure tone (a non-random signal). We then analyzed the aperiodic slope of the EEG power spectral density, a proposed direct measure of neural noise. Pink noise affected the aperiodic slope differently based on ADHD traits; specifically, it increased the slope in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, indicating a decrease in neural noise. Crucially, the same effect was observed for the pure tone. These findings challenge the MBA model by demonstrating that both random (pink noise) and non-random (pure tone) signals reduce neural noise in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, contradicting the proposed mechanism of stochastic resonance, as well as the direction of effects suggested by the MBA model. These findings warrant further investigation, also in a clinical ADHD sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10870547251357074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251357074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251357074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中度脑觉醒(MBA)模型认为ADHD个体的神经噪声水平较低,而听觉随机噪声可以引起随机共振(SR)并增加神经噪声,从而提高其认知能力。事实上,研究表明,随机的听觉噪音,比如白噪音,可以提高多动症患者的认知能力。然而,由于缺乏结合第二种非随机听觉条件和神经噪声指标的研究,关于ADHD中的神经噪声和SR要求的假设尚未得到充分的检验。因此,69名神经正常的成年人完成了ASRS来评估ADHD特征,并进行了闭眼静息状态EEG,分为三个2分钟的块:沉默,连续听觉粉红噪声(随机信号)和连续100 Hz纯音(非随机信号)。然后我们分析了脑电功率谱密度的非周期斜率,这是一种直接测量神经噪声的方法。粉红噪声对ADHD特征的非周期斜率影响不同;具体来说,它增加了ADHD特征升高的个体的斜率,表明神经噪声减少。至关重要的是,在纯音中也观察到了同样的效果。这些发现挑战了MBA模型,表明随机(粉红噪声)和非随机(纯音)信号都能降低ADHD特征升高个体的神经噪声,这与随机共振的机制以及MBA模型所建议的效果方向相矛盾。这些发现值得进一步的研究,在临床ADHD样本中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pink Noise and a Pure Tone Both Reduce 1/f Neural Noise in Adults With Elevated ADHD Traits: A Critical Appraisal of the Moderate Brain Arousal Model.

The moderate brain arousal (MBA) model posits that individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD have lower levels of neural noise and that auditory random noise can elicit stochastic resonance (SR) and increase neural noise, which improves their cognitive performance. Indeed, research shows that auditory random noise, such as white noise, improves cognitive performance in individuals with (elevated traits of) ADHD. However, the assumptions regarding neural noise in ADHD and the requirement of SR have been insufficiently examined due to a lack of studies incorporating both a second non-random auditory condition and an index of neural noise. Therefore, 69 neurotypical adults completed the ASRS to assess ADHD traits and underwent eyes-closed resting-state EEG, subdivided into three 2-min blocks: silence, continuous auditory pink noise (a random signal), and a continuous 100 Hz pure tone (a non-random signal). We then analyzed the aperiodic slope of the EEG power spectral density, a proposed direct measure of neural noise. Pink noise affected the aperiodic slope differently based on ADHD traits; specifically, it increased the slope in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, indicating a decrease in neural noise. Crucially, the same effect was observed for the pure tone. These findings challenge the MBA model by demonstrating that both random (pink noise) and non-random (pure tone) signals reduce neural noise in individuals with elevated ADHD traits, contradicting the proposed mechanism of stochastic resonance, as well as the direction of effects suggested by the MBA model. These findings warrant further investigation, also in a clinical ADHD sample.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信