全国69,424例抽脂手术并发症及风险分析

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Mariam Saad, Sara C Chaker, Andrew J James, Ya-Ching Hung, Lisandro Montorfano, Galen Perdikis, James C Grotting, Kent Higdon, Susan Orra
{"title":"全国69,424例抽脂手术并发症及风险分析","authors":"Mariam Saad, Sara C Chaker, Andrew J James, Ya-Ching Hung, Lisandro Montorfano, Galen Perdikis, James C Grotting, Kent Higdon, Susan Orra","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liposuction is the most common plastic surgery procedure performed in the United States. Continued advancements have led to the development of five common approaches to liposuction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare complications and associated risk factors between liposuction modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing liposuction from March 2015 to December 2022 were identified using the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL, USA). Demographics and major complications were reported. Findings were compared between five types of liposuction: conventional, infusion-assisted, laser-assisted, power-assisted, and ultrasound-assisted. Risk factors and complications associated with each type were identified. A subgroup analysis of patients who received liposuction alone was also completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69,424 patients underwent liposuction, with an average age of 43 and a female predominance of 93.2%. Conventional liposuction (56.5%) was the most prevalent method, followed by power-assisted (32%), laser-assisted (8%), ultrasound-assisted (4%), and infusion-assisted (0.4%). Complication rates varied, with infusion-assisted liposuction showing a 6.7 times higher risk, while laser-assisted liposuction had a 50% lower risk compared to conventional liposuction. The overall complication rate among patients receiving liposuction alone was 1.16% with infusion-assisted liposuction having the highest risk. Patients who underwent infusion-assisted liposuction had a higher rate of infection (0.54%, p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liposuction is associated with low complication rates, with hematoma and infection being the most prevalent. While power-assisted liposuction had the highest rate of major complications, regression analysis controlling for confounders showed that infusion-assisted liposuction had the highest risk of serious complications. Factors like diabetes and being underweight correlate with higher complication risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Nationwide Analysis of Complications and Risks Associated With Types of Liposuction in 69,424 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Saad, Sara C Chaker, Andrew J James, Ya-Ching Hung, Lisandro Montorfano, Galen Perdikis, James C Grotting, Kent Higdon, Susan Orra\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liposuction is the most common plastic surgery procedure performed in the United States. Continued advancements have led to the development of five common approaches to liposuction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare complications and associated risk factors between liposuction modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing liposuction from March 2015 to December 2022 were identified using the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL, USA). Demographics and major complications were reported. Findings were compared between five types of liposuction: conventional, infusion-assisted, laser-assisted, power-assisted, and ultrasound-assisted. Risk factors and complications associated with each type were identified. A subgroup analysis of patients who received liposuction alone was also completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69,424 patients underwent liposuction, with an average age of 43 and a female predominance of 93.2%. Conventional liposuction (56.5%) was the most prevalent method, followed by power-assisted (32%), laser-assisted (8%), ultrasound-assisted (4%), and infusion-assisted (0.4%). Complication rates varied, with infusion-assisted liposuction showing a 6.7 times higher risk, while laser-assisted liposuction had a 50% lower risk compared to conventional liposuction. The overall complication rate among patients receiving liposuction alone was 1.16% with infusion-assisted liposuction having the highest risk. Patients who underwent infusion-assisted liposuction had a higher rate of infection (0.54%, p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liposuction is associated with low complication rates, with hematoma and infection being the most prevalent. While power-assisted liposuction had the highest rate of major complications, regression analysis controlling for confounders showed that infusion-assisted liposuction had the highest risk of serious complications. Factors like diabetes and being underweight correlate with higher complication risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吸脂是美国最常见的整形手术。持续的进步导致了五种常见吸脂方法的发展。目的:本研究旨在比较不同吸脂方式的并发症及相关危险因素。方法:2015年3月至2022年12月期间接受抽脂手术的患者使用CosmetAssure数据库(Birmingham, AL, USA)进行识别。报告了人口统计学和主要并发症。比较了五种吸脂方式:常规、输液辅助、激光辅助、动力辅助和超声辅助。确定了每种类型的危险因素和并发症。对单独接受抽脂的患者也进行了亚组分析。结果:共69,424例患者行抽脂术,平均年龄43岁,女性占93.2%。传统吸脂(56.5%)是最普遍的方法,其次是动力辅助(32%)、激光辅助(8%)、超声辅助(4%)和输液辅助(0.4%)。并发症发生率各不相同,输注辅助吸脂术的风险高出6.7倍,而激光辅助吸脂术的风险比传统吸脂术低50%。单纯吸脂术患者总并发症发生率为1.16%,以输液辅助吸脂术风险最高。结论:吸脂术并发症发生率低,血肿和感染发生率最高。虽然动力吸脂术的主要并发症发生率最高,但控制混杂因素的回归分析显示,输液吸脂术的严重并发症发生率最高。糖尿病和体重过轻等因素与较高的并发症风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Nationwide Analysis of Complications and Risks Associated With Types of Liposuction in 69,424 Patients.

Background: Liposuction is the most common plastic surgery procedure performed in the United States. Continued advancements have led to the development of five common approaches to liposuction.

Objectives: This study aims to compare complications and associated risk factors between liposuction modalities.

Methods: Patients undergoing liposuction from March 2015 to December 2022 were identified using the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL, USA). Demographics and major complications were reported. Findings were compared between five types of liposuction: conventional, infusion-assisted, laser-assisted, power-assisted, and ultrasound-assisted. Risk factors and complications associated with each type were identified. A subgroup analysis of patients who received liposuction alone was also completed.

Results: A total of 69,424 patients underwent liposuction, with an average age of 43 and a female predominance of 93.2%. Conventional liposuction (56.5%) was the most prevalent method, followed by power-assisted (32%), laser-assisted (8%), ultrasound-assisted (4%), and infusion-assisted (0.4%). Complication rates varied, with infusion-assisted liposuction showing a 6.7 times higher risk, while laser-assisted liposuction had a 50% lower risk compared to conventional liposuction. The overall complication rate among patients receiving liposuction alone was 1.16% with infusion-assisted liposuction having the highest risk. Patients who underwent infusion-assisted liposuction had a higher rate of infection (0.54%, p<0.05).

Conclusions: Liposuction is associated with low complication rates, with hematoma and infection being the most prevalent. While power-assisted liposuction had the highest rate of major complications, regression analysis controlling for confounders showed that infusion-assisted liposuction had the highest risk of serious complications. Factors like diabetes and being underweight correlate with higher complication risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信