18α-甘草次酸和18β-甘草次酸在小鼠体内的抗过敏作用及药代动力学。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Mitsuhiko Nose, Cheri Fukaya, Shinsuke Hisaka
{"title":"18α-甘草次酸和18β-甘草次酸在小鼠体内的抗过敏作用及药代动力学。","authors":"Mitsuhiko Nose,&nbsp;Cheri Fukaya,&nbsp;Shinsuke Hisaka","doi":"10.1007/s11418-025-01941-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we explored the anti-allergic actions of 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acids (18α-GA and 18β-GA), to compare the pharmacological properties of these stereoisomers and to clarify the immunopharmacological contribution of 18α-glycyrrhizin in licorice. 18β-GA exhibited anti-allergic effects in murine models of contact dermatitis and IgE-mediated immediate allergic dermatitis, whereas 18α-GA showed no such effects. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this variation, the blood concentrations of 18α-GA and 18β-GA were measured after the oral administration of both compounds; we detected only 18β-GA in sera. We also demonstrated that considerable amounts of 18α-GA remained in the small intestine, which indicates low absorption of 18α-GA from the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, 18α-GA, like 18β-GA, directly suppressed IgE-mediated degranulation in RBL-2H3, and both showed equivalent clearance after intravenous administration. In conclusion, 18α-GA was not absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract in mice and did not exhibit the anti-allergic actions exhibited by 18β-GA. To clarify the differences in absorbability between these two compounds further research focusing on the gastrointestinal absorption of 18β-GA is needed.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><img></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Medicines","volume":"79 5","pages":"1236 - 1242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuhiko Nose,&nbsp;Cheri Fukaya,&nbsp;Shinsuke Hisaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11418-025-01941-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we explored the anti-allergic actions of 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acids (18α-GA and 18β-GA), to compare the pharmacological properties of these stereoisomers and to clarify the immunopharmacological contribution of 18α-glycyrrhizin in licorice. 18β-GA exhibited anti-allergic effects in murine models of contact dermatitis and IgE-mediated immediate allergic dermatitis, whereas 18α-GA showed no such effects. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this variation, the blood concentrations of 18α-GA and 18β-GA were measured after the oral administration of both compounds; we detected only 18β-GA in sera. We also demonstrated that considerable amounts of 18α-GA remained in the small intestine, which indicates low absorption of 18α-GA from the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, 18α-GA, like 18β-GA, directly suppressed IgE-mediated degranulation in RBL-2H3, and both showed equivalent clearance after intravenous administration. In conclusion, 18α-GA was not absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract in mice and did not exhibit the anti-allergic actions exhibited by 18β-GA. To clarify the differences in absorbability between these two compounds further research focusing on the gastrointestinal absorption of 18β-GA is needed.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><img></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Medicines\",\"volume\":\"79 5\",\"pages\":\"1236 - 1242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Medicines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11418-025-01941-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Medicines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11418-025-01941-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了18α-甘草次酸和18β-甘草次酸(18α-GA和18β-GA)的抗过敏作用,比较了这两种立体异构体的药理学性质,并阐明了18α-甘草酸在甘草中的免疫药理作用。18β-GA对小鼠接触性皮炎和ige介导的即刻变应性皮炎模型均有抗过敏作用,而18α-GA无此作用。为了阐明这种变化的机制,我们在口服这两种化合物后测量了18α-GA和18β-GA的血药浓度;我们在血清中仅检测到18β-GA。我们还证明了小肠中仍有相当数量的18α-GA,这表明胃肠道对18α-GA的吸收率很低。此外,18α-GA与18β-GA一样,可直接抑制ige介导的RBL-2H3的脱粒,且经静脉给药后两者均表现出相当的清除率。综上所述,18α-GA不能通过胃肠道被小鼠吸收,也不具有18β-GA所具有的抗过敏作用。为了弄清这两种化合物在吸收性上的差异,需要进一步研究18β-GA的胃肠道吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice

Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice

Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice

In this study, we explored the anti-allergic actions of 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acids (18α-GA and 18β-GA), to compare the pharmacological properties of these stereoisomers and to clarify the immunopharmacological contribution of 18α-glycyrrhizin in licorice. 18β-GA exhibited anti-allergic effects in murine models of contact dermatitis and IgE-mediated immediate allergic dermatitis, whereas 18α-GA showed no such effects. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this variation, the blood concentrations of 18α-GA and 18β-GA were measured after the oral administration of both compounds; we detected only 18β-GA in sera. We also demonstrated that considerable amounts of 18α-GA remained in the small intestine, which indicates low absorption of 18α-GA from the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, 18α-GA, like 18β-GA, directly suppressed IgE-mediated degranulation in RBL-2H3, and both showed equivalent clearance after intravenous administration. In conclusion, 18α-GA was not absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract in mice and did not exhibit the anti-allergic actions exhibited by 18β-GA. To clarify the differences in absorbability between these two compounds further research focusing on the gastrointestinal absorption of 18β-GA is needed.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Natural Medicines is an international journal publishing original research in naturally occurring medicines and their related foods and cosmetics. It covers: -chemistry of natural products -biochemistry of medicinal plants -pharmacology of natural products and herbs, including Kampo formulas and traditional herbs -botanical anatomy -cultivation of medicinal plants. The journal accepts Original Papers, Notes, Rapid Communications and Natural Resource Letters. Reviews and Mini-Reviews are generally invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信