用概率评估方法评价岩体的Mohr-Coulomb和Hoek-Brown强度准则

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geofluids Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1155/gfl/3682700
Naeem Abbas, Kegang Li, Lei Wang, Yewuhalashet Fissha, Kausar Sultan Shah, Taoufik Saidani
{"title":"用概率评估方法评价岩体的Mohr-Coulomb和Hoek-Brown强度准则","authors":"Naeem Abbas,&nbsp;Kegang Li,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Yewuhalashet Fissha,&nbsp;Kausar Sultan Shah,&nbsp;Taoufik Saidani","doi":"10.1155/gfl/3682700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Hoek–Brown (H-B) criterion is widely recognized as a standard in geotechnical engineering for assessing rock mass strength across various rock mass qualities. However, challenges arise in explicitly defining the Mohr failure envelope, particularly when the strength parameter “<i>a</i>” deviates from the conventional value of 0.5. This study investigates the compressive strength of rock masses in the Himalayas, particularly in the context of deep tunneling and slope stability, using the H-B and Mohr–Coulomb (MC) criteria. Initially, the MC and H-B criteria were combined while varying the angle of internal friction, revealing an inconsistent trend in friction angles regarding rock mass compressive strength. The relationship between tunnel depth, slope height, and rock mass compressive strength was then examined by combining equations involving RMR, RQD, and modified H-B criteria. The combination of H-B and MC resulted in lower rock mass compressive strength values, while noncombined equations yielded higher values. Incorporating the geological strength index (GSI) provided higher and more suitable compressive strength values. For the Himalayas, the suggested H-B equations with GSI are recommended for both surface and subsurface excavations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12512,"journal":{"name":"Geofluids","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/gfl/3682700","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Mohr–Coulomb and Hoek–Brown Strength Criteria for Rock Masses Using Probabilistic Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Naeem Abbas,&nbsp;Kegang Li,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Yewuhalashet Fissha,&nbsp;Kausar Sultan Shah,&nbsp;Taoufik Saidani\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/gfl/3682700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Hoek–Brown (H-B) criterion is widely recognized as a standard in geotechnical engineering for assessing rock mass strength across various rock mass qualities. However, challenges arise in explicitly defining the Mohr failure envelope, particularly when the strength parameter “<i>a</i>” deviates from the conventional value of 0.5. This study investigates the compressive strength of rock masses in the Himalayas, particularly in the context of deep tunneling and slope stability, using the H-B and Mohr–Coulomb (MC) criteria. Initially, the MC and H-B criteria were combined while varying the angle of internal friction, revealing an inconsistent trend in friction angles regarding rock mass compressive strength. The relationship between tunnel depth, slope height, and rock mass compressive strength was then examined by combining equations involving RMR, RQD, and modified H-B criteria. The combination of H-B and MC resulted in lower rock mass compressive strength values, while noncombined equations yielded higher values. Incorporating the geological strength index (GSI) provided higher and more suitable compressive strength values. For the Himalayas, the suggested H-B equations with GSI are recommended for both surface and subsurface excavations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geofluids\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/gfl/3682700\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geofluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/gfl/3682700\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofluids","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/gfl/3682700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Hoek-Brown (H-B)准则被广泛认为是岩土工程中评估各种岩体质量的岩体强度的标准。然而,在明确定义Mohr破坏包络线时出现了挑战,特别是当强度参数“a”偏离常规值0.5时。本研究使用H-B和Mohr-Coulomb (MC)准则研究了喜马拉雅地区岩体的抗压强度,特别是在深隧道和边坡稳定性的背景下。最初,MC和H-B准则在改变内摩擦角的情况下合并,发现摩擦角对岩体抗压强度的变化趋势不一致。然后,通过结合RMR、RQD和修正H-B准则的方程来检验隧道深度、边坡高度和岩体抗压强度之间的关系。H-B和MC联合计算导致岩体抗压强度值较低,而非联合计算导致岩体抗压强度值较高。结合地质强度指数(GSI)提供了更高、更合适的抗压强度值。对于喜马拉雅山脉,地表和地下开挖均建议采用含GSI的H-B方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Mohr–Coulomb and Hoek–Brown Strength Criteria for Rock Masses Using Probabilistic Assessment

Evaluating Mohr–Coulomb and Hoek–Brown Strength Criteria for Rock Masses Using Probabilistic Assessment

The Hoek–Brown (H-B) criterion is widely recognized as a standard in geotechnical engineering for assessing rock mass strength across various rock mass qualities. However, challenges arise in explicitly defining the Mohr failure envelope, particularly when the strength parameter “a” deviates from the conventional value of 0.5. This study investigates the compressive strength of rock masses in the Himalayas, particularly in the context of deep tunneling and slope stability, using the H-B and Mohr–Coulomb (MC) criteria. Initially, the MC and H-B criteria were combined while varying the angle of internal friction, revealing an inconsistent trend in friction angles regarding rock mass compressive strength. The relationship between tunnel depth, slope height, and rock mass compressive strength was then examined by combining equations involving RMR, RQD, and modified H-B criteria. The combination of H-B and MC resulted in lower rock mass compressive strength values, while noncombined equations yielded higher values. Incorporating the geological strength index (GSI) provided higher and more suitable compressive strength values. For the Himalayas, the suggested H-B equations with GSI are recommended for both surface and subsurface excavations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geofluids
Geofluids 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.60%
发文量
835
期刊介绍: Geofluids is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for original research and reviews relating to the role of fluids in mineralogical, chemical, and structural evolution of the Earth’s crust. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of sub-disciplines in which Geofluids research is carried out. To this end, authors are encouraged to stress the transdisciplinary relevance and international ramifications of their research. Authors are also encouraged to make their work as accessible as possible to readers from other sub-disciplines. Geofluids emphasizes chemical, microbial, and physical aspects of subsurface fluids throughout the Earth’s crust. Geofluids spans studies of groundwater, terrestrial or submarine geothermal fluids, basinal brines, petroleum, metamorphic waters or magmatic fluids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信