Rahul D. Patel, Nour Awad, Denzel Ryan D. Cruz, Aida M. Hasson, Cameron D. Cook, Danielle Hall, Gregory R. Dion
{"title":"临床前声带和气道损伤模型:范围综述","authors":"Rahul D. Patel, Nour Awad, Denzel Ryan D. Cruz, Aida M. Hasson, Cameron D. Cook, Danielle Hall, Gregory R. Dion","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Preclinical models are necessary to study the pathophysiology of laryngotracheal diseases and novel treatments. Currently, there is no consensus on species, injury mechanics, and study duration This review provides a contemporary overview of the studies of vocal fold and laryngotracheal injuries in preclinical models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science involving various animal models undergoing vocal fold, trachea, and laryngotracheal injury and/or wound healing studies from 2013 to 2023. Articles were independently screened and selected by four reviewers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1279 filtered studies, 197 studies were identified and categorized by species, study duration, and mechanism of injury (MOI): vocal fold stripping, intubation, lasers, microtools, scraping, and other MOIs. Within each MOI, studies were grouped by animal model, with subsections discussing tissue target, research aim, analysis method, and study duration. Leporine and rat models were the most employed animal models for both vocal fold wound healing and laryngotracheal models. Leporine studies had the broadest diversity in MOIs, with lasers, microtools, scraping, and other methods used. Comparatively, rat studies primarily utilized vocal fold stripping as a MOI, perhaps second to anatomic limitations. Larger species, specifically porcine models, were most prevalent in intubation injury studies. Ferret, mouse, and ovine models were less utilized. Study duration varied from 1 day to 3 months in vocal fold injury models and 30 min to 12 months in laryngotracheal injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This review provides a foundational framework to collate and interpret available data on preclinical vocal fold and laryngotracheal injury models to guide future study design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Five scoping review/NA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70173","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Rahul D. Patel, Nour Awad, Denzel Ryan D. Cruz, Aida M. Hasson, Cameron D. Cook, Danielle Hall, Gregory R. Dion\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preclinical models are necessary to study the pathophysiology of laryngotracheal diseases and novel treatments. Currently, there is no consensus on species, injury mechanics, and study duration This review provides a contemporary overview of the studies of vocal fold and laryngotracheal injuries in preclinical models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science involving various animal models undergoing vocal fold, trachea, and laryngotracheal injury and/or wound healing studies from 2013 to 2023. Articles were independently screened and selected by four reviewers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 1279 filtered studies, 197 studies were identified and categorized by species, study duration, and mechanism of injury (MOI): vocal fold stripping, intubation, lasers, microtools, scraping, and other MOIs. Within each MOI, studies were grouped by animal model, with subsections discussing tissue target, research aim, analysis method, and study duration. Leporine and rat models were the most employed animal models for both vocal fold wound healing and laryngotracheal models. Leporine studies had the broadest diversity in MOIs, with lasers, microtools, scraping, and other methods used. Comparatively, rat studies primarily utilized vocal fold stripping as a MOI, perhaps second to anatomic limitations. Larger species, specifically porcine models, were most prevalent in intubation injury studies. Ferret, mouse, and ovine models were less utilized. Study duration varied from 1 day to 3 months in vocal fold injury models and 30 min to 12 months in laryngotracheal injuries.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review provides a foundational framework to collate and interpret available data on preclinical vocal fold and laryngotracheal injury models to guide future study design.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five scoping review/NA.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70173\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的建立临床前模型是研究喉气管疾病病理生理学和新治疗方法的必要条件。目前,在种类、损伤机制和研究持续时间方面尚无共识。本文综述了临床前模型中声带和喉气管损伤的最新研究概况。方法检索2013 - 2023年在PubMed和Web of Science中进行声带、气管和喉气管损伤和/或伤口愈合研究的各种动物模型。文章由四位审稿人独立筛选和选择。结果在1279项经过筛选的研究中,197项研究被确定并按种类、研究持续时间和损伤机制(MOI)进行分类:声带剥离、插管、激光、微工具、刮削和其他MOI。在每个MOI中,根据动物模型对研究进行分组,并在小节中讨论组织靶点、研究目的、分析方法和研究时间。无论是声带创面愈合模型还是喉气管模型,均以黄芪素和大鼠模型最为常用。Leporine研究在MOIs中具有最广泛的多样性,使用了激光,微工具,刮削和其他方法。相比之下,大鼠研究主要利用声带剥离作为MOI,这可能是解剖学上的限制。较大的物种,特别是猪模型,在插管损伤研究中最为普遍。雪貂、小鼠和绵羊模型较少使用。研究时间从声带损伤模型的1天到3个月不等,喉气管损伤模型的30分钟到12个月不等。结论本综述为整理和解释临床前声带和喉气管损伤模型的现有数据提供了基础框架,以指导未来的研究设计。证据水平5级范围审查/NA。
Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review
Objectives
Preclinical models are necessary to study the pathophysiology of laryngotracheal diseases and novel treatments. Currently, there is no consensus on species, injury mechanics, and study duration This review provides a contemporary overview of the studies of vocal fold and laryngotracheal injuries in preclinical models.
Methods
A search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science involving various animal models undergoing vocal fold, trachea, and laryngotracheal injury and/or wound healing studies from 2013 to 2023. Articles were independently screened and selected by four reviewers.
Results
Of 1279 filtered studies, 197 studies were identified and categorized by species, study duration, and mechanism of injury (MOI): vocal fold stripping, intubation, lasers, microtools, scraping, and other MOIs. Within each MOI, studies were grouped by animal model, with subsections discussing tissue target, research aim, analysis method, and study duration. Leporine and rat models were the most employed animal models for both vocal fold wound healing and laryngotracheal models. Leporine studies had the broadest diversity in MOIs, with lasers, microtools, scraping, and other methods used. Comparatively, rat studies primarily utilized vocal fold stripping as a MOI, perhaps second to anatomic limitations. Larger species, specifically porcine models, were most prevalent in intubation injury studies. Ferret, mouse, and ovine models were less utilized. Study duration varied from 1 day to 3 months in vocal fold injury models and 30 min to 12 months in laryngotracheal injuries.
Conclusion
This review provides a foundational framework to collate and interpret available data on preclinical vocal fold and laryngotracheal injury models to guide future study design.