Y. C. M. de Souza, F. S. Annibale, F. Nomura, D. C. Rossa-Feres
{"title":"研究触媒和底栖蝌蚪在触媒鱼的存在下所引起的行为反应","authors":"Y. C. M. de Souza, F. S. Annibale, F. Nomura, D. C. Rossa-Feres","doi":"10.1111/jzo.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Different defensive strategies are used by tadpoles to avoid or escape from predators, and it is possible that differences in the microhabitat of prey and predators influence the defensive strategies used by tadpoles. Therefore, we experimentally tested whether the presence of a nektonic fish predator (<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>) reduces the time of displacement, increases the latency to start foraging, and reduces the amount of food consumed by nektonic (<i>Scinax fuscovarius</i>) and benthic (<i>Physalaemus nattereri</i>) tadpoles. Contrary to our expectations, the presence of the predator did not affect the behavior of the nektonic tadpoles. Conversely, however, benthic tadpoles reduced their displacement time in the presence of the predator. It is possible that, due to the ability of nektonic predators to occupy the entire water column, they may trigger defensive behaviors in benthic prey, while the silvery coloring of nektonic tadpoles would reduce their detectability by aquatic predators. Thus, nektonic tadpoles were less reactive toward the presence of predators, despite sharing the same microspatial niche, whereas benthic tadpoles seem to be more reactive toward predators, despite the fact that they do not share their microspatial niche.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"326 3","pages":"268-276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the behavioral responses of nektonic and benthic tadpoles elicited by the presence of a predatory nektonic fish\",\"authors\":\"Y. C. M. de Souza, F. S. Annibale, F. Nomura, D. C. Rossa-Feres\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jzo.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Different defensive strategies are used by tadpoles to avoid or escape from predators, and it is possible that differences in the microhabitat of prey and predators influence the defensive strategies used by tadpoles. Therefore, we experimentally tested whether the presence of a nektonic fish predator (<i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>) reduces the time of displacement, increases the latency to start foraging, and reduces the amount of food consumed by nektonic (<i>Scinax fuscovarius</i>) and benthic (<i>Physalaemus nattereri</i>) tadpoles. Contrary to our expectations, the presence of the predator did not affect the behavior of the nektonic tadpoles. Conversely, however, benthic tadpoles reduced their displacement time in the presence of the predator. It is possible that, due to the ability of nektonic predators to occupy the entire water column, they may trigger defensive behaviors in benthic prey, while the silvery coloring of nektonic tadpoles would reduce their detectability by aquatic predators. Thus, nektonic tadpoles were less reactive toward the presence of predators, despite sharing the same microspatial niche, whereas benthic tadpoles seem to be more reactive toward predators, despite the fact that they do not share their microspatial niche.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":\"326 3\",\"pages\":\"268-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.70020\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.70020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the behavioral responses of nektonic and benthic tadpoles elicited by the presence of a predatory nektonic fish
Different defensive strategies are used by tadpoles to avoid or escape from predators, and it is possible that differences in the microhabitat of prey and predators influence the defensive strategies used by tadpoles. Therefore, we experimentally tested whether the presence of a nektonic fish predator (Oreochromis niloticus) reduces the time of displacement, increases the latency to start foraging, and reduces the amount of food consumed by nektonic (Scinax fuscovarius) and benthic (Physalaemus nattereri) tadpoles. Contrary to our expectations, the presence of the predator did not affect the behavior of the nektonic tadpoles. Conversely, however, benthic tadpoles reduced their displacement time in the presence of the predator. It is possible that, due to the ability of nektonic predators to occupy the entire water column, they may trigger defensive behaviors in benthic prey, while the silvery coloring of nektonic tadpoles would reduce their detectability by aquatic predators. Thus, nektonic tadpoles were less reactive toward the presence of predators, despite sharing the same microspatial niche, whereas benthic tadpoles seem to be more reactive toward predators, despite the fact that they do not share their microspatial niche.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications.
The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.