精神科住院医师QI模块的评估

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1111/tct.70170
Kamini Vasudev, Jeffrey P. Reiss
{"title":"精神科住院医师QI模块的评估","authors":"Kamini Vasudev,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Reiss","doi":"10.1111/tct.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Quality improvement (QI) training and experience is increasingly being recognised as a mandatory core area of residency training. This was a QI initiative to develop and evaluate a QI Fundamentals teaching curriculum for psychiatry residents, in an effective and time-efficient manner.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Using principles from the book <i>Teaching QI in Residency Education</i>, we developed and evaluated a workshop for first year psychiatry residents. Educational material on QI methods and tools was emailed to the residents a week prior to the 3.5-h workshop, which entailed a 50-min didactic session followed by two interactive sessions of 60 min each with both small group and large group components.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Effectiveness was assessed using the Self-Assessment Program (SAP), a standardised, validated tool for assessing QI competencies, over 3 consecutive academic year cohorts. The SAP evaluates the trainee's comfort level in 10 domains, regarding their current skills with various aspects of quality improvement. Twenty-three residents completed the pre- and post-SAP. There was a significant improvement in post-SAP versus pre-SAP scores in each of the 3 years in all of the 10 domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The results suggest that this interactive QI workshop may be an effective and time-efficient model for imparting fundamental QI education to junior psychiatry residents and may be easily replicated by other programmes in psychiatry or other medical specialties, in particular where there are constraints in terms of time, funding and expertise in QI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents\",\"authors\":\"Kamini Vasudev,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Reiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quality improvement (QI) training and experience is increasingly being recognised as a mandatory core area of residency training. This was a QI initiative to develop and evaluate a QI Fundamentals teaching curriculum for psychiatry residents, in an effective and time-efficient manner.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using principles from the book <i>Teaching QI in Residency Education</i>, we developed and evaluated a workshop for first year psychiatry residents. Educational material on QI methods and tools was emailed to the residents a week prior to the 3.5-h workshop, which entailed a 50-min didactic session followed by two interactive sessions of 60 min each with both small group and large group components.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Effectiveness was assessed using the Self-Assessment Program (SAP), a standardised, validated tool for assessing QI competencies, over 3 consecutive academic year cohorts. The SAP evaluates the trainee's comfort level in 10 domains, regarding their current skills with various aspects of quality improvement. Twenty-three residents completed the pre- and post-SAP. There was a significant improvement in post-SAP versus pre-SAP scores in each of the 3 years in all of the 10 domains.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results suggest that this interactive QI workshop may be an effective and time-efficient model for imparting fundamental QI education to junior psychiatry residents and may be easily replicated by other programmes in psychiatry or other medical specialties, in particular where there are constraints in terms of time, funding and expertise in QI.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70170\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量改进(QI)培训和经验越来越被认为是住院医师培训的一个强制性核心领域。这是一项QI倡议,以有效和省时的方式为精神病学住院医师开发和评估QI基础教学课程。方法:利用《住院医师教育中的QI教学》一书中的原则,我们为一年级精神病学住院医师开发并评估了一个研讨会。在3.5小时的研讨会前一周,有关QI方法和工具的教育材料通过电子邮件发送给居民,该研讨会包括50分钟的教学会议,然后是两个60分钟的互动会议,每个会议由小小组和大小组组成。评估有效性使用自评估程序(SAP)进行评估,这是一种标准化的,经过验证的评估QI能力的工具,连续3个学年的队列。SAP评估受训者在10个领域的舒适程度,考虑到他们目前的技能和质量改进的各个方面。23名住院患者完成了sap前和sap后。在所有10个领域中,在每三年的每一年,sap后与sap前的得分都有显著的改善。结果表明,这种互动式的QI研讨会可能是一种有效的、省时的模式,可以向初级精神病学住院医师传授基本的QI教育,并且可以很容易地被精神病学或其他医学专业的其他项目所复制,特别是在时间、资金和QI专业知识方面受到限制的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents

Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents

Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents

Evaluation of a QI Module for Psychiatry Residents

Background

Quality improvement (QI) training and experience is increasingly being recognised as a mandatory core area of residency training. This was a QI initiative to develop and evaluate a QI Fundamentals teaching curriculum for psychiatry residents, in an effective and time-efficient manner.

Approach

Using principles from the book Teaching QI in Residency Education, we developed and evaluated a workshop for first year psychiatry residents. Educational material on QI methods and tools was emailed to the residents a week prior to the 3.5-h workshop, which entailed a 50-min didactic session followed by two interactive sessions of 60 min each with both small group and large group components.

Evaluation

Effectiveness was assessed using the Self-Assessment Program (SAP), a standardised, validated tool for assessing QI competencies, over 3 consecutive academic year cohorts. The SAP evaluates the trainee's comfort level in 10 domains, regarding their current skills with various aspects of quality improvement. Twenty-three residents completed the pre- and post-SAP. There was a significant improvement in post-SAP versus pre-SAP scores in each of the 3 years in all of the 10 domains.

Implications

The results suggest that this interactive QI workshop may be an effective and time-efficient model for imparting fundamental QI education to junior psychiatry residents and may be easily replicated by other programmes in psychiatry or other medical specialties, in particular where there are constraints in terms of time, funding and expertise in QI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信