Xiaojuan Nie, Yan Zhang, Zhian Bao, Kaiyun Chen, Wenqiang Yang and Honglin Yuan
{"title":"新型碧玺标准物质257 nm fs-LA和193 nm ns-LA-MC-ICP-MS对硼同位素分析基质效应的评价","authors":"Xiaojuan Nie, Yan Zhang, Zhian Bao, Kaiyun Chen, Wenqiang Yang and Honglin Yuan","doi":"10.1039/D5JA00167F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study compared boron (B) isotopic compositions of six chemically diverse tourmalines (including schorl, dravite, and elbaite types) using 257 nm femtosecond (fs) and 193 nm nanosecond (ns) laser ablation coupled with multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS). Significant matrix effects were observed when non-matrix-matched standards were used, leading to <em>δ</em><small><sup>11</sup></small>B deviations of −0.70‰ to −0.41‰ for fs-LA and −0.63‰ to −0.57‰ for ns-LA when using dravite GIGT as a bracketing standard for schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4) and elbaite (TOUR6). In contrast, using GIGT as the matrix-matched bracketing standard in the B analysis of dravites (TOUR2, TOUR3, and TOUR5) yielded significantly lower deviations of −0.22‰ to −0.18‰ for fs-LA and −0.44‰ to 0.12‰ for ns-LA. These findings necessitate matrix-matched standards for precise and accurate <em>in situ</em> measurements of B isotopes. We characterized four natural tourmaline reference materials (TOUR1, TOUR4, TOUR5, and TOUR6) for <em>in situ</em> B isotope analysis using LA-MC-ICP-MS and confirmed their isotopic homogeneity. The measured mean <em>δ</em><small><sup>11</sup></small>B values were −11.14 ± 0.40‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 597), −13.42 ± 0.57‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 509), −9.09 ± 0.60‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 486), and −8.57 ± 0.17‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 164), respectively, agreeing well with those obtained by solution nebulizer (SN)-MC-ICP-MS. Thus, schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4), dravite (TOUR5), and elbaite (TOUR6) are recommended as candidate matrix-matched tourmaline reference materials for <em>in situ</em> B isotope determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 8","pages":" 2049-2061"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of matrix effects in boron isotope analysis using 257 nm fs-LA and 193 nm ns-LA-MC-ICP-MS with new tourmaline reference materials†\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojuan Nie, Yan Zhang, Zhian Bao, Kaiyun Chen, Wenqiang Yang and Honglin Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5JA00167F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study compared boron (B) isotopic compositions of six chemically diverse tourmalines (including schorl, dravite, and elbaite types) using 257 nm femtosecond (fs) and 193 nm nanosecond (ns) laser ablation coupled with multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS). Significant matrix effects were observed when non-matrix-matched standards were used, leading to <em>δ</em><small><sup>11</sup></small>B deviations of −0.70‰ to −0.41‰ for fs-LA and −0.63‰ to −0.57‰ for ns-LA when using dravite GIGT as a bracketing standard for schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4) and elbaite (TOUR6). In contrast, using GIGT as the matrix-matched bracketing standard in the B analysis of dravites (TOUR2, TOUR3, and TOUR5) yielded significantly lower deviations of −0.22‰ to −0.18‰ for fs-LA and −0.44‰ to 0.12‰ for ns-LA. These findings necessitate matrix-matched standards for precise and accurate <em>in situ</em> measurements of B isotopes. We characterized four natural tourmaline reference materials (TOUR1, TOUR4, TOUR5, and TOUR6) for <em>in situ</em> B isotope analysis using LA-MC-ICP-MS and confirmed their isotopic homogeneity. The measured mean <em>δ</em><small><sup>11</sup></small>B values were −11.14 ± 0.40‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 597), −13.42 ± 0.57‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 509), −9.09 ± 0.60‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 486), and −8.57 ± 0.17‰ (2SD, <em>n</em> = 164), respectively, agreeing well with those obtained by solution nebulizer (SN)-MC-ICP-MS. Thus, schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4), dravite (TOUR5), and elbaite (TOUR6) are recommended as candidate matrix-matched tourmaline reference materials for <em>in situ</em> B isotope determination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\" 2049-2061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00167f\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00167f","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究采用257 nm飞秒(fs)和193 nm纳秒(ns)激光烧蚀耦合多集电极电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-MC-ICP-MS)技术,比较了6种化学性质不同的电气石(包括肖尔石、拉维石和榴石)的硼(B)同位素组成。当使用非基质匹配标准时,观察到显著的基质效应,导致fs-LA的δ11B偏差为- 0.70‰~ - 0.41‰,ns-LA的δ11B偏差为- 0.63‰~ - 0.57‰,当使用驱动石GIGT作为学校(TOUR1和TOUR4)和elbaite (TOUR6)的括号标准时。相比之下,使用GIGT作为矩阵匹配的套标标准在B分析中(TOUR2、TOUR3和TOUR5), fs-LA的偏差显著降低,为- 0.22‰至- 0.18‰,ns-LA的偏差为- 0.44‰至0.12‰。这些发现需要对B同位素进行精确和准确的原位测量的基质匹配标准。采用LA-MC-ICP-MS对4种天然碧玺基准物质TOUR1、TOUR4、TOUR5和TOUR6进行原位B同位素分析,并确认了它们的同位素均匀性。测定的δ11B平均值分别为- 11.14±0.40‰(2SD, n = 597)、- 13.42±0.57‰(2SD, n = 509)、- 9.09±0.60‰(2SD, n = 486)和- 8.57±0.17‰(2SD, n = 164),与溶液雾化器(SN)-MC-ICP-MS测定值吻合较好。因此,推荐schl (TOUR1和TOUR4)、dravite (TOUR5)和elbaite (TOUR6)作为备选基质匹配电气石基准物质用于原位B同位素测定。
Assessment of matrix effects in boron isotope analysis using 257 nm fs-LA and 193 nm ns-LA-MC-ICP-MS with new tourmaline reference materials†
This study compared boron (B) isotopic compositions of six chemically diverse tourmalines (including schorl, dravite, and elbaite types) using 257 nm femtosecond (fs) and 193 nm nanosecond (ns) laser ablation coupled with multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS). Significant matrix effects were observed when non-matrix-matched standards were used, leading to δ11B deviations of −0.70‰ to −0.41‰ for fs-LA and −0.63‰ to −0.57‰ for ns-LA when using dravite GIGT as a bracketing standard for schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4) and elbaite (TOUR6). In contrast, using GIGT as the matrix-matched bracketing standard in the B analysis of dravites (TOUR2, TOUR3, and TOUR5) yielded significantly lower deviations of −0.22‰ to −0.18‰ for fs-LA and −0.44‰ to 0.12‰ for ns-LA. These findings necessitate matrix-matched standards for precise and accurate in situ measurements of B isotopes. We characterized four natural tourmaline reference materials (TOUR1, TOUR4, TOUR5, and TOUR6) for in situ B isotope analysis using LA-MC-ICP-MS and confirmed their isotopic homogeneity. The measured mean δ11B values were −11.14 ± 0.40‰ (2SD, n = 597), −13.42 ± 0.57‰ (2SD, n = 509), −9.09 ± 0.60‰ (2SD, n = 486), and −8.57 ± 0.17‰ (2SD, n = 164), respectively, agreeing well with those obtained by solution nebulizer (SN)-MC-ICP-MS. Thus, schorl (TOUR1 and TOUR4), dravite (TOUR5), and elbaite (TOUR6) are recommended as candidate matrix-matched tourmaline reference materials for in situ B isotope determination.