有机产品防治蓝莓锈病的评价

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Kara M. Barry , Michele Buntain , Eugene Chau , Melinda Simpson , Stephen Morris , Jay Anderson
{"title":"有机产品防治蓝莓锈病的评价","authors":"Kara M. Barry ,&nbsp;Michele Buntain ,&nbsp;Eugene Chau ,&nbsp;Melinda Simpson ,&nbsp;Stephen Morris ,&nbsp;Jay Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blueberry rust, caused by <em>Pucciniastrum minimum</em>, is spread primarily by urediniospores and causes lesions on foliage and fruit. Options to enable organic growers in Australia to control blueberry rust are limited, with alternatives to conventional fungicides and copper being sought. This paper presents results of two glasshouse experiments with pot-grown blueberries (inoculated with urediniospores) and two field experiments in a commercial orchard, to assess the efficacy of a range of products, using a highly susceptible cultivar. Seven products with some known ability to inhibit rust pathogens were compared to a conventional fungicide (mancozeb) and copper, at a range of rates. These included the biological control Serenade® Opti® (<em>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</em>), Intervene® (fungal-derived polyoxin-D), Eco-carb® Plus, Stim-phos®, Aminogro®, Eco-oil®, and Anolyte (electrolysed water). Low levels of disease were obtained in the glasshouse experiments, but there was some significant difference between treatments for rust severity and incidence. As there was no evidence of phytotoxicity, field experiments were conducted with all products (except Stim-phos® as it was not commercially available at the time). Field experiments showed that products could reduce blueberry rust disease in some situations, but the most repeatable result was with Intervene®. Intervene® reduced the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) value by approximately 20 % and 25 % compared to the poorest performing treatments in field experiment 1 and 2 respectively. While none of the products trialled led to control of blueberry rust, Intervene® provided the most repeatable suppression, with no impact on fruit bloom.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of organic products to control blueberry rust\",\"authors\":\"Kara M. Barry ,&nbsp;Michele Buntain ,&nbsp;Eugene Chau ,&nbsp;Melinda Simpson ,&nbsp;Stephen Morris ,&nbsp;Jay Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Blueberry rust, caused by <em>Pucciniastrum minimum</em>, is spread primarily by urediniospores and causes lesions on foliage and fruit. Options to enable organic growers in Australia to control blueberry rust are limited, with alternatives to conventional fungicides and copper being sought. This paper presents results of two glasshouse experiments with pot-grown blueberries (inoculated with urediniospores) and two field experiments in a commercial orchard, to assess the efficacy of a range of products, using a highly susceptible cultivar. Seven products with some known ability to inhibit rust pathogens were compared to a conventional fungicide (mancozeb) and copper, at a range of rates. These included the biological control Serenade® Opti® (<em>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</em>), Intervene® (fungal-derived polyoxin-D), Eco-carb® Plus, Stim-phos®, Aminogro®, Eco-oil®, and Anolyte (electrolysed water). Low levels of disease were obtained in the glasshouse experiments, but there was some significant difference between treatments for rust severity and incidence. As there was no evidence of phytotoxicity, field experiments were conducted with all products (except Stim-phos® as it was not commercially available at the time). Field experiments showed that products could reduce blueberry rust disease in some situations, but the most repeatable result was with Intervene®. Intervene® reduced the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) value by approximately 20 % and 25 % compared to the poorest performing treatments in field experiment 1 and 2 respectively. While none of the products trialled led to control of blueberry rust, Intervene® provided the most repeatable suppression, with no impact on fruit bloom.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500242X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500242X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蓝莓锈病是由最小紫霉引起的,主要通过脲孢子传播,对叶子和果实造成损害。让澳大利亚的有机种植者控制蓝莓锈病的选择有限,人们正在寻找传统杀菌剂和铜的替代品。本文介绍了两个盆栽蓝莓(接种了脲孢子)的温室试验和两个商业果园的田间试验的结果,以评估一系列产品的功效,使用一个高度敏感的品种。在一定的速率范围内,将7种已知具有一定抑制锈病病原体能力的产品与传统的杀菌剂(代森锰锌)和铜进行比较。其中包括生物防治剂Serenade®Opti®(解淀粉芽孢杆菌)、Intervene®(真菌衍生的多毒素d)、Eco-carb®Plus、Stim-phos®、Aminogro®、Eco-oil®和Anolyte(电解水)。在温室试验中,病害水平较低,但不同处理之间的锈病严重程度和发病率有显著差异。由于没有植物毒性的证据,所有产品都进行了现场实验(除了Stim-phos®,因为当时还没有市售)。现场实验表明,在某些情况下,产品可以减少蓝莓锈病,但最可重复的结果是干预®。与田间试验1和2中表现最差的处理相比,干预®使疾病进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)值分别减少了约20%和25%。虽然没有试验产品导致控制蓝莓锈病,干预®提供了最可重复的抑制,对果实开花没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of organic products to control blueberry rust
Blueberry rust, caused by Pucciniastrum minimum, is spread primarily by urediniospores and causes lesions on foliage and fruit. Options to enable organic growers in Australia to control blueberry rust are limited, with alternatives to conventional fungicides and copper being sought. This paper presents results of two glasshouse experiments with pot-grown blueberries (inoculated with urediniospores) and two field experiments in a commercial orchard, to assess the efficacy of a range of products, using a highly susceptible cultivar. Seven products with some known ability to inhibit rust pathogens were compared to a conventional fungicide (mancozeb) and copper, at a range of rates. These included the biological control Serenade® Opti® (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens), Intervene® (fungal-derived polyoxin-D), Eco-carb® Plus, Stim-phos®, Aminogro®, Eco-oil®, and Anolyte (electrolysed water). Low levels of disease were obtained in the glasshouse experiments, but there was some significant difference between treatments for rust severity and incidence. As there was no evidence of phytotoxicity, field experiments were conducted with all products (except Stim-phos® as it was not commercially available at the time). Field experiments showed that products could reduce blueberry rust disease in some situations, but the most repeatable result was with Intervene®. Intervene® reduced the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) value by approximately 20 % and 25 % compared to the poorest performing treatments in field experiment 1 and 2 respectively. While none of the products trialled led to control of blueberry rust, Intervene® provided the most repeatable suppression, with no impact on fruit bloom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信