{"title":"宽恕作为知识共享的催化剂:克服虐待监督对关系依恋的影响","authors":"Yimo Shen , Bin Yang , Yucheng Zhang , Junqi Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowledge sharing has assumed special importance in modern knowledge-based economy. Extant research pertaining to knowledge sharing primarily focused on antecedents that encourage knowledge sharing with scant attention to its barriers. Drawing on attachment theory, we proposed and tested a moderated mediation model in which forgiveness climate moderates the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing via relational attachment with their supervisor. Analyses from STUDY 1 revealed that the negative relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor was moderated by forgiveness climate such that the relationship is weaker when forgiveness climate is higher. Based on this, the results of STUDY 2 revealed that: (1) Abusive supervision affects knowledge sharing through the mediating role of relational attachment with supervisor; (2) Forgiveness climate further moderated the indirect effect of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing through employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor such that the indirect relationship was weakened when forgiveness climate is high rather than low. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115625"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgiveness as a catalyst for knowledge sharing: overcoming the effects of abusive supervision on relational attachment\",\"authors\":\"Yimo Shen , Bin Yang , Yucheng Zhang , Junqi Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Knowledge sharing has assumed special importance in modern knowledge-based economy. Extant research pertaining to knowledge sharing primarily focused on antecedents that encourage knowledge sharing with scant attention to its barriers. Drawing on attachment theory, we proposed and tested a moderated mediation model in which forgiveness climate moderates the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing via relational attachment with their supervisor. Analyses from STUDY 1 revealed that the negative relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor was moderated by forgiveness climate such that the relationship is weaker when forgiveness climate is higher. Based on this, the results of STUDY 2 revealed that: (1) Abusive supervision affects knowledge sharing through the mediating role of relational attachment with supervisor; (2) Forgiveness climate further moderated the indirect effect of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing through employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor such that the indirect relationship was weakened when forgiveness climate is high rather than low. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004485\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Forgiveness as a catalyst for knowledge sharing: overcoming the effects of abusive supervision on relational attachment
Knowledge sharing has assumed special importance in modern knowledge-based economy. Extant research pertaining to knowledge sharing primarily focused on antecedents that encourage knowledge sharing with scant attention to its barriers. Drawing on attachment theory, we proposed and tested a moderated mediation model in which forgiveness climate moderates the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing via relational attachment with their supervisor. Analyses from STUDY 1 revealed that the negative relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor was moderated by forgiveness climate such that the relationship is weaker when forgiveness climate is higher. Based on this, the results of STUDY 2 revealed that: (1) Abusive supervision affects knowledge sharing through the mediating role of relational attachment with supervisor; (2) Forgiveness climate further moderated the indirect effect of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing through employees’ relational attachment with their supervisor such that the indirect relationship was weakened when forgiveness climate is high rather than low. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.