HSTA逻辑模型：预测学业和生活成功的心理测量结果的比较分析

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101492

Sherron Benson McKendall , Alan McKendall , Michael Mann , Alfgeir Kristjansson , Catherine Morton , Summer Kuhn , Merge McMillion , Ann Chester

{"title":"HSTA逻辑模型：预测学业和生活成功的心理测量结果的比较分析","authors":"Sherron Benson McKendall , Alan McKendall , Michael Mann , Alfgeir Kristjansson , Catherine Morton , Summer Kuhn , Merge McMillion , Ann Chester","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the 1960’s, federally funded pre-college academic enrichment programs were created to address the education barriers experienced by underserved students. Yet, the gaps continue to persist. This study examined psychosocial factors (e.g., pro academic identity, intellectual risk taking, social support, intentions, participatory community citizenship, etc.) for improving academic outcomes and wellbeing for participants in an out-of-school-time (OST) STEM+Medicine program. Participants’ psychosocial responses were compared to a control group. Results revealed that program participants showed significant differences on key psychosocial factors compared to non-participants. Significant relationships were shown between the primary variables (i.e., intentions and participatory community citizenship scale-b) and demographic/psychosocial variables through Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and path analysis models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The HSTA logic model: A comparative analysis of psychometric outcomes for predicting academic and life success\",\"authors\":\"Sherron Benson McKendall , Alan McKendall , Michael Mann , Alfgeir Kristjansson , Catherine Morton , Summer Kuhn , Merge McMillion , Ann Chester\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the 1960’s, federally funded pre-college academic enrichment programs were created to address the education barriers experienced by underserved students. Yet, the gaps continue to persist. This study examined psychosocial factors (e.g., pro academic identity, intellectual risk taking, social support, intentions, participatory community citizenship, etc.) for improving academic outcomes and wellbeing for participants in an out-of-school-time (OST) STEM+Medicine program. Participants’ psychosocial responses were compared to a control group. Results revealed that program participants showed significant differences on key psychosocial factors compared to non-participants. Significant relationships were shown between the primary variables (i.e., intentions and participatory community citizenship scale-b) and demographic/psychosocial variables through Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and path analysis models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000495\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪60年代，联邦政府资助的大学前学术充实计划被创建，以解决教育不足的学生所经历的教育障碍。然而，差距继续存在。本研究考察了社会心理因素（如：学术认同、智力冒险、社会支持、意向、参与性社区公民身份等）对改善校外STEM+医学项目参与者的学术成果和幸福感的影响。参与者的社会心理反应与对照组进行了比较。结果显示，与非参与者相比，项目参与者在关键社会心理因素上存在显著差异。通过普通最小二乘（OLS）回归和路径分析模型，显示了主要变量（即意图和参与性社区公民量表-b）与人口统计学/社会心理变量之间的显著关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The HSTA logic model: A comparative analysis of psychometric outcomes for predicting academic and life success

In the 1960’s, federally funded pre-college academic enrichment programs were created to address the education barriers experienced by underserved students. Yet, the gaps continue to persist. This study examined psychosocial factors (e.g., pro academic identity, intellectual risk taking, social support, intentions, participatory community citizenship, etc.) for improving academic outcomes and wellbeing for participants in an out-of-school-time (OST) STEM+Medicine program. Participants’ psychosocial responses were compared to a control group. Results revealed that program participants showed significant differences on key psychosocial factors compared to non-participants. Significant relationships were shown between the primary variables (i.e., intentions and participatory community citizenship scale-b) and demographic/psychosocial variables through Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and path analysis models.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Educational Evaluation Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.