揭示非国家行为体的话语在加强乌干达采掘业气候正义中的作用

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Estellina Namutebi , Joost Dessein , Cuthbert Tukundane
{"title":"揭示非国家行为体的话语在加强乌干达采掘业气候正义中的作用","authors":"Estellina Namutebi ,&nbsp;Joost Dessein ,&nbsp;Cuthbert Tukundane","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Ugandan government has made progress in developing extractive industries, but its commitment to environmental protection and improving living conditions for rural communities remains inadequate. The impact of extractive industries is increasingly evident, as droughts and poor crop yields threaten food security and local economies. Thus, the advocacy of non-state actors, such as civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations, faith-based organisations, and community-based organisations, is essential for promoting climate justice and implementing sustainable, eco-friendly practices in this sector. Thus, the research question is: How have non-state actors' discourses effectively rallied rural communities and government entities to enhance climate justice within extractive industries? Employing a qualitative methodology, the research involved in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with diverse stakeholders in the Albertine Graben. Our findings discovered that for non-state actors, climate justice revolves around three discourses (socio-cultural, ecosystem-based, and policy connectivity). These are interrelated through collaborative governance, which seeks to enhance transparency and accountability within the extractive industries. However, climate injustice remains widespread in the region, highlighting the ongoing failure to achieve climate justice in extractive industries. Therefore, collaborative governance is essential for promoting climate justice and enabling equitable decision-making that addresses the environmental and social disparities caused by extractive industrial activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101741"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the role of non-state actors' discourses in enhancing climate justice in Uganda's extractive industries\",\"authors\":\"Estellina Namutebi ,&nbsp;Joost Dessein ,&nbsp;Cuthbert Tukundane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Ugandan government has made progress in developing extractive industries, but its commitment to environmental protection and improving living conditions for rural communities remains inadequate. The impact of extractive industries is increasingly evident, as droughts and poor crop yields threaten food security and local economies. Thus, the advocacy of non-state actors, such as civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations, faith-based organisations, and community-based organisations, is essential for promoting climate justice and implementing sustainable, eco-friendly practices in this sector. Thus, the research question is: How have non-state actors' discourses effectively rallied rural communities and government entities to enhance climate justice within extractive industries? Employing a qualitative methodology, the research involved in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with diverse stakeholders in the Albertine Graben. Our findings discovered that for non-state actors, climate justice revolves around three discourses (socio-cultural, ecosystem-based, and policy connectivity). These are interrelated through collaborative governance, which seeks to enhance transparency and accountability within the extractive industries. However, climate injustice remains widespread in the region, highlighting the ongoing failure to achieve climate justice in extractive industries. Therefore, collaborative governance is essential for promoting climate justice and enabling equitable decision-making that addresses the environmental and social disparities caused by extractive industrial activities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乌干达政府在发展采掘业方面取得了进展,但其对环境保护和改善农村社区生活条件的承诺仍然不足。采掘业的影响越来越明显,因为干旱和作物减产威胁着粮食安全和当地经济。因此,民间社会组织、非政府组织、信仰组织和社区组织等非国家行为体的倡导对于促进气候正义和在该领域实施可持续、环保的做法至关重要。因此,研究的问题是:非国家行为体的话语如何有效地团结农村社区和政府实体,以加强采掘业的气候正义?该研究采用定性方法,与艾伯丁地堑的不同利益相关者进行了深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。我们的研究发现,对于非国家行为体来说,气候正义围绕着三个话语(社会文化、基于生态系统和政策连通性)展开。这些通过协作治理相互关联,协作治理旨在提高采掘业的透明度和问责制。然而,气候不公正在该地区仍然普遍存在,凸显了采掘业在实现气候公正方面的持续失败。因此,协作治理对于促进气候正义和实现公平决策至关重要,从而解决采掘工业活动造成的环境和社会差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking the role of non-state actors' discourses in enhancing climate justice in Uganda's extractive industries
The Ugandan government has made progress in developing extractive industries, but its commitment to environmental protection and improving living conditions for rural communities remains inadequate. The impact of extractive industries is increasingly evident, as droughts and poor crop yields threaten food security and local economies. Thus, the advocacy of non-state actors, such as civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations, faith-based organisations, and community-based organisations, is essential for promoting climate justice and implementing sustainable, eco-friendly practices in this sector. Thus, the research question is: How have non-state actors' discourses effectively rallied rural communities and government entities to enhance climate justice within extractive industries? Employing a qualitative methodology, the research involved in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with diverse stakeholders in the Albertine Graben. Our findings discovered that for non-state actors, climate justice revolves around three discourses (socio-cultural, ecosystem-based, and policy connectivity). These are interrelated through collaborative governance, which seeks to enhance transparency and accountability within the extractive industries. However, climate injustice remains widespread in the region, highlighting the ongoing failure to achieve climate justice in extractive industries. Therefore, collaborative governance is essential for promoting climate justice and enabling equitable decision-making that addresses the environmental and social disparities caused by extractive industrial activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信