提高评估碱-硅反应(ASR)损伤的效率:点计数显微镜的自动化方法

Cassandra Trottier , Laurent Ramos Cheret , Haoye Lu , Anthony Allard , Maia Fraser , Leandro F.M. Sanchez
{"title":"提高评估碱-硅反应(ASR)损伤的效率:点计数显微镜的自动化方法","authors":"Cassandra Trottier ,&nbsp;Laurent Ramos Cheret ,&nbsp;Haoye Lu ,&nbsp;Anthony Allard ,&nbsp;Maia Fraser ,&nbsp;Leandro F.M. Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The damage rating index (DRI) is a valuable microscopy tool for collecting and counting data on different types of concrete cracks, such as those associated with alkali-silica reaction (ASR) induced deterioration. Yet, the procedure presents drawbacks such as time consumption and variability linked to operator experience, which has sparked debates about the subjectivity of its outcomes. Embracing the forefront of technological advancements, this study explores the practicality of automating the DRI's data collection through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Like many image processing and analysis applications that use AI, the DRI is an object classification and segmentation task. This study represents a step forward in leveraging automation to enhance the objectivity and efficiency of ASR damage characterization in concrete through point-count microscopy, along with proposing a set of tools to evaluate the outcomes from the application’s perspective for more efficient training data selection. Results show that despite obtaining acceptable performance individually, where the detector-classifier performance was found to have an accuracy of 0.744, and the crack counter accuracy was 0.988, the current version of the proposed machine still displays high variability in detecting, classifying, and counting distinct crack types. Overall, the machine overestimates ASR-induced damage, which was further verified through the Chi-square goodness of fit test, indicating that further training and enhancement of the proposed machine are required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing efficiency in evaluating alkali-silica reaction (ASR) damage: an automated approach to point-count microscopy\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra Trottier ,&nbsp;Laurent Ramos Cheret ,&nbsp;Haoye Lu ,&nbsp;Anthony Allard ,&nbsp;Maia Fraser ,&nbsp;Leandro F.M. Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The damage rating index (DRI) is a valuable microscopy tool for collecting and counting data on different types of concrete cracks, such as those associated with alkali-silica reaction (ASR) induced deterioration. Yet, the procedure presents drawbacks such as time consumption and variability linked to operator experience, which has sparked debates about the subjectivity of its outcomes. Embracing the forefront of technological advancements, this study explores the practicality of automating the DRI's data collection through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Like many image processing and analysis applications that use AI, the DRI is an object classification and segmentation task. This study represents a step forward in leveraging automation to enhance the objectivity and efficiency of ASR damage characterization in concrete through point-count microscopy, along with proposing a set of tools to evaluate the outcomes from the application’s perspective for more efficient training data selection. Results show that despite obtaining acceptable performance individually, where the detector-classifier performance was found to have an accuracy of 0.744, and the crack counter accuracy was 0.988, the current version of the proposed machine still displays high variability in detecting, classifying, and counting distinct crack types. Overall, the machine overestimates ASR-induced damage, which was further verified through the Chi-square goodness of fit test, indicating that further training and enhancement of the proposed machine are required.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEMENT\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922500026X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922500026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

损伤等级指数(DRI)是一种有价值的显微工具,用于收集和计数不同类型的混凝土裂缝数据,例如与碱-硅反应(ASR)引起的恶化有关的裂缝。然而,该方法存在一些缺点,如耗时和与操作人员经验相关的可变性,这引发了关于其结果主观性的争论。拥抱技术进步的前沿,本研究探索了通过人工智能(AI)和机器学习实现DRI数据收集自动化的可行性。像许多使用人工智能的图像处理和分析应用程序一样,DRI是一个对象分类和分割任务。这项研究代表了利用自动化技术通过点计数显微镜来提高混凝土ASR损伤表征的客观性和效率的一步,同时提出了一套工具来从应用程序的角度评估结果,以更有效地训练数据选择。结果表明,尽管单独获得了可接受的性能,其中检测器-分类器性能的准确率为0.744,裂纹计数器精度为0.988,但当前版本的机器在检测,分类和计数不同的裂纹类型方面仍然表现出很高的可变性。总的来说,机器高估了asr引起的损伤,卡方拟合优度检验进一步验证了这一点,表明需要进一步训练和增强所提出的机器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing efficiency in evaluating alkali-silica reaction (ASR) damage: an automated approach to point-count microscopy
The damage rating index (DRI) is a valuable microscopy tool for collecting and counting data on different types of concrete cracks, such as those associated with alkali-silica reaction (ASR) induced deterioration. Yet, the procedure presents drawbacks such as time consumption and variability linked to operator experience, which has sparked debates about the subjectivity of its outcomes. Embracing the forefront of technological advancements, this study explores the practicality of automating the DRI's data collection through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Like many image processing and analysis applications that use AI, the DRI is an object classification and segmentation task. This study represents a step forward in leveraging automation to enhance the objectivity and efficiency of ASR damage characterization in concrete through point-count microscopy, along with proposing a set of tools to evaluate the outcomes from the application’s perspective for more efficient training data selection. Results show that despite obtaining acceptable performance individually, where the detector-classifier performance was found to have an accuracy of 0.744, and the crack counter accuracy was 0.988, the current version of the proposed machine still displays high variability in detecting, classifying, and counting distinct crack types. Overall, the machine overestimates ASR-induced damage, which was further verified through the Chi-square goodness of fit test, indicating that further training and enhancement of the proposed machine are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信