{"title":"空间裕度、粗饲料补充和富集对常规室内养猪生长、胴体重和肉质的影响","authors":"Mathilde Coutant , Marlene Schou Grønbeck , Marchen Hviid , Lene J. Pedersen , Mona L.V. Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensification of indoor pig husbandry is increasingly under focus, but effects on meat quality remain to be determined. This study investigated the effects of extensification factors on growth, carcass weight and meat quality of fattening pigs. Three factors were studied on pigs from 30 kg up to slaughter at approximately 120 kg: increase space allowance to 1.4 (S9, n pigs = 108, n samples = 42) or 2.1 (S6, n pigs = 72, n samples = 42) m2 per pig, provision of various enrichments (E, n pigs = 114, n samples = 44), and daily provision of roughage (R, n pigs = 115, n samples = 45). Treatments were compared to a control group with 0.7 m2 per pig and no extra enrichment nor roughage (C, n pigs = 115, n samples = 48). The study was performed over two batches, in spring and in autumn. The treatments had overall no effect on meat quality as measured by temperature and pH, colour, driploss, cooking loss or texture. However, the meat from S9 pigs had a significantly lighter colour than the meat from C, R or E and in addition, pigs from S6 had a higher growth rate (ADG) and carcass weight than C and R. Overall, the treatments had little to no effect on meat quality but increasing space allowance by a factor three notably improved pig growth. In contrast, the experimental batch significantly influenced several parameters of meat quality as well as growth and carcass weight, highlighting that un-controlled factors varying between batches, including seasonal effects, had a greater impact on meat quality than the treatments alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 109916"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of space allowance, roughage supplement, and enrichment provision on growth, carcass weight and meat quality in conventional indoor pig husbandry\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Coutant , Marlene Schou Grønbeck , Marchen Hviid , Lene J. Pedersen , Mona L.V. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Extensification of indoor pig husbandry is increasingly under focus, but effects on meat quality remain to be determined. This study investigated the effects of extensification factors on growth, carcass weight and meat quality of fattening pigs. Three factors were studied on pigs from 30 kg up to slaughter at approximately 120 kg: increase space allowance to 1.4 (S9, n pigs = 108, n samples = 42) or 2.1 (S6, n pigs = 72, n samples = 42) m2 per pig, provision of various enrichments (E, n pigs = 114, n samples = 44), and daily provision of roughage (R, n pigs = 115, n samples = 45). Treatments were compared to a control group with 0.7 m2 per pig and no extra enrichment nor roughage (C, n pigs = 115, n samples = 48). The study was performed over two batches, in spring and in autumn. The treatments had overall no effect on meat quality as measured by temperature and pH, colour, driploss, cooking loss or texture. However, the meat from S9 pigs had a significantly lighter colour than the meat from C, R or E and in addition, pigs from S6 had a higher growth rate (ADG) and carcass weight than C and R. Overall, the treatments had little to no effect on meat quality but increasing space allowance by a factor three notably improved pig growth. In contrast, the experimental batch significantly influenced several parameters of meat quality as well as growth and carcass weight, highlighting that un-controlled factors varying between batches, including seasonal effects, had a greater impact on meat quality than the treatments alone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Science\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174025001779\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174025001779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of space allowance, roughage supplement, and enrichment provision on growth, carcass weight and meat quality in conventional indoor pig husbandry
Extensification of indoor pig husbandry is increasingly under focus, but effects on meat quality remain to be determined. This study investigated the effects of extensification factors on growth, carcass weight and meat quality of fattening pigs. Three factors were studied on pigs from 30 kg up to slaughter at approximately 120 kg: increase space allowance to 1.4 (S9, n pigs = 108, n samples = 42) or 2.1 (S6, n pigs = 72, n samples = 42) m2 per pig, provision of various enrichments (E, n pigs = 114, n samples = 44), and daily provision of roughage (R, n pigs = 115, n samples = 45). Treatments were compared to a control group with 0.7 m2 per pig and no extra enrichment nor roughage (C, n pigs = 115, n samples = 48). The study was performed over two batches, in spring and in autumn. The treatments had overall no effect on meat quality as measured by temperature and pH, colour, driploss, cooking loss or texture. However, the meat from S9 pigs had a significantly lighter colour than the meat from C, R or E and in addition, pigs from S6 had a higher growth rate (ADG) and carcass weight than C and R. Overall, the treatments had little to no effect on meat quality but increasing space allowance by a factor three notably improved pig growth. In contrast, the experimental batch significantly influenced several parameters of meat quality as well as growth and carcass weight, highlighting that un-controlled factors varying between batches, including seasonal effects, had a greater impact on meat quality than the treatments alone.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.