自动调节气道正压:工程学与医学之间的微妙界限。

IF 2
Ludovico Messineo, David P White, Bernard Hete, Michael Knepper, Richard Berry, William H Noah
{"title":"自动调节气道正压:工程学与医学之间的微妙界限。","authors":"Ludovico Messineo, David P White, Bernard Hete, Michael Knepper, Richard Berry, William H Noah","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03409-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Ludovico Messineo, David P White, Bernard Hete, Michael Knepper, Richard Berry, William H Noah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03409-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03409-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03409-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动调节气道正压(APAP)与连续PAP (CPAP)不同,它根据从导出的流量信号自动检测到的事件动态调整治疗压力。APAP于上世纪90年代推出,迅速成为睡眠诊所的关键工具,最初是作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者手动滴定的更快替代方案,后来也成为一种加快随访的长期治疗选择。APAP和CPAP在依从性、疗效和症状控制方面总体上具有可比性。然而,人们仍然担心APAP对慢性健康结果(如血压、肾功能和血糖值)的控制能力较差。其他与apap相关的挑战涉及工程方面。一个主要的问题是,控制事件检测/识别和压力调节的APAP算法是各制造商专有的,并且各不相同,这使得临床医生对它们的理解很差。此外,与手动滴定或手动评分的多导睡眠图相比,APAP算法并不总是匹配得很好,特别是在存在无意泄漏的情况下。设备之间的事件检测、泄漏补偿和压力调节算法的可变性为临床决策增加了另一层复杂性。所有这些都使OSA患者的管理复杂化,这些患者可能会留下大量残留的呼吸紊乱,高泄漏和宽压力范围。本综述旨在弥合APAP的临床和工程观点之间的差距,提供当前知识的最新概述和睡眠临床医生在管理OSA患者接受PAP治疗时应考虑的现有挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信