不同类型甲壳对嗅觉功能的影响。

IF 1.3
Süheyla Kandemir, Gözde Pamuk, Ramazan Tiken, Erim Pamuk, Adnan Özdemir
{"title":"不同类型甲壳对嗅觉功能的影响。","authors":"Süheyla Kandemir, Gözde Pamuk, Ramazan Tiken, Erim Pamuk, Adnan Özdemir","doi":"10.1159/000547417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of different types of concha bullosa (CB) on olfactory function using paranasal computed tomography (CT) findings and the Sniffin' Sticks test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 107 patients (69 women and 38 men) were evaluated. The study group included 79 patients with CB, while the control group comprised 28 patients without CB. CB cases were classified into three subtypes according to the Bolger classification: lamellar (n = 28), bulbous (n = 25), and extensive (n = 26). Paranasal CT scans were assessed by a radiologist to measure the olfactory cleft width, the distance between the turbinate and septum, and the volume of the turbinate bullosa. All participants completed the SNOT-22 and NOSE questionnaires. Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin' Sticks test, and examinations were conducted by an otolaryngology specialist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age and gender (p > 0.05). The Sniffin' Sticks test score was significantly higher in the control group than in the CB group (p < 0.001). The control group had significantly higher odor scores than the lamellar and extensive groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042, respectively) but not the bulbous group (p = 0.133). The volume of the CB (vertical axis and horizontal axis of CB) was significantly greater in the extensive CB group than in the lamellar and bulbous groups (both p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the right, left, or total olfactory cleft widths among the four groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olfactory function, as measured by the Sniffin' Sticks test, was significantly better in the control group compared to the CB group. However, there were no significant differences in olfactory performance among the different CB subtypes. Additionally, olfactory cleft width did not differ significantly between groups. These findings suggest that while the presence of CB may be associated with reduced olfactory function, the subtype of CB and cleft width may not play a major role. Moreover, the reduction of olfactory function due to CB was minimal and not clinically meaningful.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Types of Concha Bullosa on Olfactory Function.\",\"authors\":\"Süheyla Kandemir, Gözde Pamuk, Ramazan Tiken, Erim Pamuk, Adnan Özdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of different types of concha bullosa (CB) on olfactory function using paranasal computed tomography (CT) findings and the Sniffin' Sticks test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 107 patients (69 women and 38 men) were evaluated. The study group included 79 patients with CB, while the control group comprised 28 patients without CB. CB cases were classified into three subtypes according to the Bolger classification: lamellar (n = 28), bulbous (n = 25), and extensive (n = 26). Paranasal CT scans were assessed by a radiologist to measure the olfactory cleft width, the distance between the turbinate and septum, and the volume of the turbinate bullosa. All participants completed the SNOT-22 and NOSE questionnaires. Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin' Sticks test, and examinations were conducted by an otolaryngology specialist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age and gender (p > 0.05). The Sniffin' Sticks test score was significantly higher in the control group than in the CB group (p < 0.001). The control group had significantly higher odor scores than the lamellar and extensive groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042, respectively) but not the bulbous group (p = 0.133). The volume of the CB (vertical axis and horizontal axis of CB) was significantly greater in the extensive CB group than in the lamellar and bulbous groups (both p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the right, left, or total olfactory cleft widths among the four groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olfactory function, as measured by the Sniffin' Sticks test, was significantly better in the control group compared to the CB group. However, there were no significant differences in olfactory performance among the different CB subtypes. Additionally, olfactory cleft width did not differ significantly between groups. These findings suggest that while the presence of CB may be associated with reduced olfactory function, the subtype of CB and cleft width may not play a major role. Moreover, the reduction of olfactory function due to CB was minimal and not clinically meaningful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过鼻翼计算机断层扫描(CT)和嗅探棒试验(Sniffin' Sticks test)比较不同类型的甲壳(CB)对嗅觉功能的影响。方法:对107例患者(女性69例,男性38例)进行评估。研究组包括79例CB患者,对照组包括28例无CB患者。根据Bolger分类将CB病例分为3个亚型:板层型(n=28)、球茎型(n=25)和广泛型(n=26)。鼻旁CT扫描由放射科医生评估,以测量嗅裂宽度、鼻甲和鼻中隔之间的距离以及鼻甲大球的体积。所有参与者完成了SNOT-22和NOSE问卷。使用嗅探棒测试评估嗅觉功能,并由耳鼻喉科专家进行检查。结果:两组患者年龄、性别差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。对照组嗅探棒测试得分显著高于CB组(p < 0.001)。对照组的气味评分显著高于板层组和广泛组(p= 0.002和p= 0.042),而球茎组则不显著(p=0.133)。广泛包皮包皮组甲壳大球体积(VCB和HCB)显著大于板层和球根包皮组(p < 0.001)。四组右、左、总嗅裂宽度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:嗅探棒测试显示,对照组的嗅觉功能明显优于CB组。然而,嗅觉性能在不同的CB亚型之间没有显著差异。嗅觉间隙宽度组间差异不显著。这些研究结果表明,虽然嗅觉功能下降可能与黑梭菌的存在有关,但黑梭菌的亚型和裂口宽度可能并不起主要作用。此外,由于嗅觉功能的减少是很小的,没有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Types of Concha Bullosa on Olfactory Function.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the effects of different types of concha bullosa (CB) on olfactory function using paranasal computed tomography (CT) findings and the Sniffin' Sticks test.

Methods: A total of 107 patients (69 women and 38 men) were evaluated. The study group included 79 patients with CB, while the control group comprised 28 patients without CB. CB cases were classified into three subtypes according to the Bolger classification: lamellar (n = 28), bulbous (n = 25), and extensive (n = 26). Paranasal CT scans were assessed by a radiologist to measure the olfactory cleft width, the distance between the turbinate and septum, and the volume of the turbinate bullosa. All participants completed the SNOT-22 and NOSE questionnaires. Olfactory function was evaluated using the Sniffin' Sticks test, and examinations were conducted by an otolaryngology specialist.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age and gender (p > 0.05). The Sniffin' Sticks test score was significantly higher in the control group than in the CB group (p < 0.001). The control group had significantly higher odor scores than the lamellar and extensive groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042, respectively) but not the bulbous group (p = 0.133). The volume of the CB (vertical axis and horizontal axis of CB) was significantly greater in the extensive CB group than in the lamellar and bulbous groups (both p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the right, left, or total olfactory cleft widths among the four groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Olfactory function, as measured by the Sniffin' Sticks test, was significantly better in the control group compared to the CB group. However, there were no significant differences in olfactory performance among the different CB subtypes. Additionally, olfactory cleft width did not differ significantly between groups. These findings suggest that while the presence of CB may be associated with reduced olfactory function, the subtype of CB and cleft width may not play a major role. Moreover, the reduction of olfactory function due to CB was minimal and not clinically meaningful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信