危重病人的姑息治疗咨询:时机重要吗?

IF 1.4
Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman
{"title":"危重病人的姑息治疗咨询:时机重要吗?","authors":"Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman","doi":"10.1177/10499091251364245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251364245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care Consults Among Critically Ill Patients: Does Timing Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251364245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251364245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251364245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251364245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据支持危重病人需要姑息治疗。目前尚不清楚临床医生是否能够确定哪些患者将从姑息治疗小组的icu会诊中获益最多。鉴于我们数据的局限性,我们使用住院死亡率作为未满足的姑息治疗需求的代理。方法:我们对2022年在西奈山医院姑息治疗咨询登记的MICU住院时间(LOS)≥72 h的患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用电子健康记录和管理数据,我们比较了接受icu内姑息治疗咨询的患者和接受icu后咨询的患者的社会人口学和临床特征。结果在我们的样本中,195例患者接受了icu内姑息治疗咨询,63例患者接受了icu后咨询。两组之间没有社会人口学或临床差异。与ICU后会诊组相比,接受ICU会诊的患者ICU LOS中位数更长,会诊至出院的天数更长。在住院死亡率方面没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,社会人口学和临床指标不能区分哪些患者接受了icu会诊。然而,无论就诊时间如何,本样本中所有患者的住院死亡率都很高。分娩模式需要确保更多MICU LOS≥72 h的患者接受icu姑息治疗咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palliative Care Consults Among Critically Ill Patients: Does Timing Matter?

IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信