{"title":"中国成年T2DM患者脂肪胰岛素抵抗、血清脂蛋白(a)水平和MASLD之间的关系","authors":"Yufang Liu, Jianbin Sun, Xiaomei Zhang","doi":"10.5603/ep.103993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to explore the correlation between adipose tissue insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and to assess how the serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level modifies the association between adipose insulin resistance and MASLD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and calculated the adipose insulin resistance (Adipo-IR) index as the product of the fasting insulin and free fatty acid concentration. There were 2247 participants in the study, 64.6% (n = 1452) with MASLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to subjects in the first quartile of the Adipo-IR index, there were 1.29 [odds ratio (OR): 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-3.36], 2.55 (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 2.34-5.37), and 2.00 (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.94-4.63) fold higher odds of having MASLD among subjects in the second, the third, and the fourth Adipo-IR index quartile, respectively. As the Adipo-IR index was in the range lower than 7.5, Adipo-IR was a risk factor for MASLD (OR: 1.349, 95%CI: 1.226-1.484). Conversely, if the Adipo-IR index was higher than 7.5, it became a protective factor for MASLD (OR: 0.980, 95% CI: 0.964-0.997). Subjects with high Lp(a) and low Adipo-IR showed the lowest risk of MASLD. Compared to this group, the ORs of MASLD was 2.411 (95% CI: 1.590-3.656) for the high Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group, 2.770 (95% CI: 1.808-4.246) for the high Adipo-IR and high Lp(a) group, and 1.473 (95% CI: 1.003-2.164) for the low Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with T2DM, with the increase of Adipo-IR, the incidence of MASLD showed a trend of first an increase and then a decrease. Among patients with T2DM, those with low Adipo-IR combined with high Lp(a) had the lowest risk of developing MASLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93990,"journal":{"name":"Endokrynologia Polska","volume":" ","pages":"415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between adipose insulin resistance, serum lipoprotein(a) level, and MASLD in adult patients with T2DM in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yufang Liu, Jianbin Sun, Xiaomei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/ep.103993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to explore the correlation between adipose tissue insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and to assess how the serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level modifies the association between adipose insulin resistance and MASLD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and calculated the adipose insulin resistance (Adipo-IR) index as the product of the fasting insulin and free fatty acid concentration. There were 2247 participants in the study, 64.6% (n = 1452) with MASLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to subjects in the first quartile of the Adipo-IR index, there were 1.29 [odds ratio (OR): 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-3.36], 2.55 (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 2.34-5.37), and 2.00 (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.94-4.63) fold higher odds of having MASLD among subjects in the second, the third, and the fourth Adipo-IR index quartile, respectively. As the Adipo-IR index was in the range lower than 7.5, Adipo-IR was a risk factor for MASLD (OR: 1.349, 95%CI: 1.226-1.484). Conversely, if the Adipo-IR index was higher than 7.5, it became a protective factor for MASLD (OR: 0.980, 95% CI: 0.964-0.997). Subjects with high Lp(a) and low Adipo-IR showed the lowest risk of MASLD. Compared to this group, the ORs of MASLD was 2.411 (95% CI: 1.590-3.656) for the high Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group, 2.770 (95% CI: 1.808-4.246) for the high Adipo-IR and high Lp(a) group, and 1.473 (95% CI: 1.003-2.164) for the low Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with T2DM, with the increase of Adipo-IR, the incidence of MASLD showed a trend of first an increase and then a decrease. Among patients with T2DM, those with low Adipo-IR combined with high Lp(a) had the lowest risk of developing MASLD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endokrynologia Polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"415-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endokrynologia Polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.103993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endokrynologia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.103993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between adipose insulin resistance, serum lipoprotein(a) level, and MASLD in adult patients with T2DM in China.
Introduction: The aim was to explore the correlation between adipose tissue insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and to assess how the serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level modifies the association between adipose insulin resistance and MASLD.
Material and methods: We analyzed hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and calculated the adipose insulin resistance (Adipo-IR) index as the product of the fasting insulin and free fatty acid concentration. There were 2247 participants in the study, 64.6% (n = 1452) with MASLD.
Results: Compared to subjects in the first quartile of the Adipo-IR index, there were 1.29 [odds ratio (OR): 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-3.36], 2.55 (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 2.34-5.37), and 2.00 (OR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.94-4.63) fold higher odds of having MASLD among subjects in the second, the third, and the fourth Adipo-IR index quartile, respectively. As the Adipo-IR index was in the range lower than 7.5, Adipo-IR was a risk factor for MASLD (OR: 1.349, 95%CI: 1.226-1.484). Conversely, if the Adipo-IR index was higher than 7.5, it became a protective factor for MASLD (OR: 0.980, 95% CI: 0.964-0.997). Subjects with high Lp(a) and low Adipo-IR showed the lowest risk of MASLD. Compared to this group, the ORs of MASLD was 2.411 (95% CI: 1.590-3.656) for the high Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group, 2.770 (95% CI: 1.808-4.246) for the high Adipo-IR and high Lp(a) group, and 1.473 (95% CI: 1.003-2.164) for the low Adipo-IR and low Lp(a) group.
Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, with the increase of Adipo-IR, the incidence of MASLD showed a trend of first an increase and then a decrease. Among patients with T2DM, those with low Adipo-IR combined with high Lp(a) had the lowest risk of developing MASLD.