{"title":"高流量鼻吸氧延长全麻阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的安全呼吸暂停时间:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Guiyu Lei, Siliu Yang, Lili Wu, Yue Yin, Chunhua Xi, Qingwen Yang, Guyan Wang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S518271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for rapid oxygen desaturation during anesthesia induction. Apneic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has proven effective in prolonging safe apnea time in various patient populations. However, evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in OSA patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of HFNO during anesthesia induction in OSA patients prolongs safe apnea time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized clinical trial, all participants underwent standardized pre-oxygenation and anesthesia induction. During the apneic period, oxygen was delivered either via HFNO at 60L/min (HFNO group) or with the nasal cannula left in place but disconnected from the oxygen source (control group, no supplemental oxygen). The primary outcome of this study was the time to peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO<sub>2</sub> < 95%) during apneic oxygenation. Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO<sub>2,</sub> re-oxygenation time, and tcCO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HFNO group demonstrated a significantly prolonged safe apnea time compared to the Control group (18.1 [12.1,18.8] vs 4.2 [2.5,6.3] minutes; <i>p</i> <0.001). Additionally, minimum SpO<sub>2</sub> levels were higher, and re-oxygenation time was shorter in the HFNO group (<i>p</i> <0.001 for both). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a substantially reduced risk of desaturation in the HFNO group (hazard ratio: 0.071; 95% CI, 0.021-0.222; <i>p</i> <0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, HFNO significantly prolongs safe apnea time and enhances oxygenation during anesthesia induction in OSA patients. These findings highlight the potential of HFNO to improve perioperative airway management and patient safety in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2469-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Prolongs Safe Apnea Time in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Guiyu Lei, Siliu Yang, Lili Wu, Yue Yin, Chunhua Xi, Qingwen Yang, Guyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S518271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for rapid oxygen desaturation during anesthesia induction. Apneic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has proven effective in prolonging safe apnea time in various patient populations. However, evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in OSA patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of HFNO during anesthesia induction in OSA patients prolongs safe apnea time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized clinical trial, all participants underwent standardized pre-oxygenation and anesthesia induction. During the apneic period, oxygen was delivered either via HFNO at 60L/min (HFNO group) or with the nasal cannula left in place but disconnected from the oxygen source (control group, no supplemental oxygen). The primary outcome of this study was the time to peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO<sub>2</sub> < 95%) during apneic oxygenation. Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO<sub>2,</sub> re-oxygenation time, and tcCO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HFNO group demonstrated a significantly prolonged safe apnea time compared to the Control group (18.1 [12.1,18.8] vs 4.2 [2.5,6.3] minutes; <i>p</i> <0.001). Additionally, minimum SpO<sub>2</sub> levels were higher, and re-oxygenation time was shorter in the HFNO group (<i>p</i> <0.001 for both). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a substantially reduced risk of desaturation in the HFNO group (hazard ratio: 0.071; 95% CI, 0.021-0.222; <i>p</i> <0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, HFNO significantly prolongs safe apnea time and enhances oxygenation during anesthesia induction in OSA patients. These findings highlight the potential of HFNO to improve perioperative airway management and patient safety in this high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2469-2477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301247/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S518271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S518271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Prolongs Safe Apnea Time in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for rapid oxygen desaturation during anesthesia induction. Apneic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has proven effective in prolonging safe apnea time in various patient populations. However, evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in OSA patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of HFNO during anesthesia induction in OSA patients prolongs safe apnea time.
Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, all participants underwent standardized pre-oxygenation and anesthesia induction. During the apneic period, oxygen was delivered either via HFNO at 60L/min (HFNO group) or with the nasal cannula left in place but disconnected from the oxygen source (control group, no supplemental oxygen). The primary outcome of this study was the time to peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) during apneic oxygenation. Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO2, re-oxygenation time, and tcCO2 levels.
Results: The HFNO group demonstrated a significantly prolonged safe apnea time compared to the Control group (18.1 [12.1,18.8] vs 4.2 [2.5,6.3] minutes; p <0.001). Additionally, minimum SpO2 levels were higher, and re-oxygenation time was shorter in the HFNO group (p <0.001 for both). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a substantially reduced risk of desaturation in the HFNO group (hazard ratio: 0.071; 95% CI, 0.021-0.222; p <0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: In this randomized controlled trial, HFNO significantly prolongs safe apnea time and enhances oxygenation during anesthesia induction in OSA patients. These findings highlight the potential of HFNO to improve perioperative airway management and patient safety in this high-risk population.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.