抗血管生成药物在不可切除的肝细胞癌中的一线应用:双刃剑?

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Aditya Mahadevan, Armon Azizi, Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Jennifer Valerin, April Choi, Harry Nguyen, Farshid Dayyani
{"title":"抗血管生成药物在不可切除的肝细胞癌中的一线应用:双刃剑?","authors":"Aditya Mahadevan, Armon Azizi, Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Jennifer Valerin, April Choi, Harry Nguyen, Farshid Dayyani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver malignancy, have historically been limited, particularly in unresectable cases with underlying cirrhosis. Initial systemic therapy with antiangiogenic agents, notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as sorafenib, showed modest survival gains but lacked durable responses. Subsequent trials with more potent VEGF pathway inhibitors failed to improve overall survival significantly, raising concerns about the long-term utility and potential hepatic and renal toxicities of prolonged VEGF blockade. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) marked a paradigm shift. Trial results demonstrating that dual-ICI regimens induced more durable responses and achieved higher long-term survival rates have challenged the prior VEGF-centric therapeutic approach and suggest that early use of dual ICIs may offer a more transformative effect on disease trajectory. Although anti-VEGF therapies remain valuable for initial tumor shrinkage, prolonged use may compromise liver regeneration and worsen portal hypertension. A refined treatment strategy emphasizing VEGF inhibition for a limited duration followed by or combined with ICIs may optimize both efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI response and on developing regimens that maximize long-term survival in unresectable HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51585,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","volume":"23 5","pages":"301-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line use of antiangiogenic agents in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a double-edged sword?\",\"authors\":\"Aditya Mahadevan, Armon Azizi, Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Jennifer Valerin, April Choi, Harry Nguyen, Farshid Dayyani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver malignancy, have historically been limited, particularly in unresectable cases with underlying cirrhosis. Initial systemic therapy with antiangiogenic agents, notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as sorafenib, showed modest survival gains but lacked durable responses. Subsequent trials with more potent VEGF pathway inhibitors failed to improve overall survival significantly, raising concerns about the long-term utility and potential hepatic and renal toxicities of prolonged VEGF blockade. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) marked a paradigm shift. Trial results demonstrating that dual-ICI regimens induced more durable responses and achieved higher long-term survival rates have challenged the prior VEGF-centric therapeutic approach and suggest that early use of dual ICIs may offer a more transformative effect on disease trajectory. Although anti-VEGF therapies remain valuable for initial tumor shrinkage, prolonged use may compromise liver regeneration and worsen portal hypertension. A refined treatment strategy emphasizing VEGF inhibition for a limited duration followed by or combined with ICIs may optimize both efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI response and on developing regimens that maximize long-term survival in unresectable HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"301-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤,其治疗选择历来有限,特别是在伴有肝硬化的不可切除病例中。最初使用抗血管生成药物进行全身治疗,特别是血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂如索拉非尼,显示出适度的生存增加,但缺乏持久的反应。随后使用更有效的VEGF通路抑制剂的试验未能显著提高总生存率,这引起了人们对长期阻断VEGF的效用和潜在的肝脏和肾脏毒性的担忧。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现标志着范式的转变。试验结果表明,双ici方案诱导了更持久的反应,并实现了更高的长期生存率,这对先前以vegf为中心的治疗方法提出了挑战,并表明早期使用双ici可能对疾病轨迹产生更大的变革性影响。尽管抗vegf治疗对肿瘤的初始缩小仍然有价值,但长期使用可能会损害肝脏再生并加重门静脉高压症。精细化的治疗策略强调在有限的时间内抑制VEGF,随后或联合ICIs可能优化疗效和安全性。未来的研究应侧重于确定ICI反应的预测性生物标志物,并开发最大化不可切除HCC长期生存的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-line use of antiangiogenic agents in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a double-edged sword?

Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver malignancy, have historically been limited, particularly in unresectable cases with underlying cirrhosis. Initial systemic therapy with antiangiogenic agents, notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as sorafenib, showed modest survival gains but lacked durable responses. Subsequent trials with more potent VEGF pathway inhibitors failed to improve overall survival significantly, raising concerns about the long-term utility and potential hepatic and renal toxicities of prolonged VEGF blockade. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) marked a paradigm shift. Trial results demonstrating that dual-ICI regimens induced more durable responses and achieved higher long-term survival rates have challenged the prior VEGF-centric therapeutic approach and suggest that early use of dual ICIs may offer a more transformative effect on disease trajectory. Although anti-VEGF therapies remain valuable for initial tumor shrinkage, prolonged use may compromise liver regeneration and worsen portal hypertension. A refined treatment strategy emphasizing VEGF inhibition for a limited duration followed by or combined with ICIs may optimize both efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI response and on developing regimens that maximize long-term survival in unresectable HCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology (CAH&O) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal reaching more than 27,000 hematology and oncology clinicians. CAH&O provides editorial content encompassing a wide array of topics relevant and useful to the fields of oncology and hematology, both separately and together. Content is directed by the strong input of today’s top thought leaders in hematology & oncology, including feature-length review articles, monthly columns consisting of engaging interviews with experts on current issues in solid tumor oncology, hematologic malignancies, hematologic disorders, drug development, and clinical case studies with expert commentary. CAH&O also publishes industry-supported meeting highlights, clinical roundtable monographs, and clinical review supplements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信