脓毒性关节炎的快速床边检测:评估成本效益的诊断工具。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Pranav Rajasekharan, Atmananda Hegde, Prajwal Mane, Chethan Shetty, Rishit Anand
{"title":"脓毒性关节炎的快速床边检测:评估成本效益的诊断工具。","authors":"Pranav Rajasekharan, Atmananda Hegde, Prajwal Mane, Chethan Shetty, Rishit Anand","doi":"10.3855/jidc.20882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing septic arthritis through synovial fluid culture and analysis can be time-consuming, and the limited accessibility of these tests in primary and secondary healthcare centers restricts their utility in emergency situations. Therefore, there is a pressing need for an alternative, rapid, and reliable test to significantly reduce morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leucocyte esterase (LE) and glucose reagent strip tests for the early diagnosis of septic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 75 individuals presenting with atraumatic native joint effusion. Following arthrocentesis, bedside LE and glucose strip testing were performed, along with synovial fluid culture and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 75 cases, 25 (33.3%) were diagnosed with septic arthritis based on standard diagnostic tests. The LE strip test showed a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. The glucose strip test demonstrated a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 76%, PPV of 67%, and NPV of 93%. Combining the two tests resulted in a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 77.8%, and NPV of 91.7%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 80% for the glucose strip test, 77.3% for the LE strip test, and 86.7% for the combined results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LE and glucose strip tests are cost-effective bedside assessments for the rapid diagnosis of septic arthritis. Combining the results from both strip tests yielded greater diagnostic accuracy than each one alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 7","pages":"1108-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid bedside testing for septic arthritis: evaluating cost-effective diagnostic tools.\",\"authors\":\"Pranav Rajasekharan, Atmananda Hegde, Prajwal Mane, Chethan Shetty, Rishit Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.3855/jidc.20882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing septic arthritis through synovial fluid culture and analysis can be time-consuming, and the limited accessibility of these tests in primary and secondary healthcare centers restricts their utility in emergency situations. Therefore, there is a pressing need for an alternative, rapid, and reliable test to significantly reduce morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leucocyte esterase (LE) and glucose reagent strip tests for the early diagnosis of septic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 75 individuals presenting with atraumatic native joint effusion. Following arthrocentesis, bedside LE and glucose strip testing were performed, along with synovial fluid culture and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 75 cases, 25 (33.3%) were diagnosed with septic arthritis based on standard diagnostic tests. The LE strip test showed a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. The glucose strip test demonstrated a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 76%, PPV of 67%, and NPV of 93%. Combining the two tests resulted in a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 77.8%, and NPV of 91.7%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 80% for the glucose strip test, 77.3% for the LE strip test, and 86.7% for the combined results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LE and glucose strip tests are cost-effective bedside assessments for the rapid diagnosis of septic arthritis. Combining the results from both strip tests yielded greater diagnostic accuracy than each one alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"19 7\",\"pages\":\"1108-1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:通过滑液培养和分析诊断脓毒性关节炎可能很耗时,而且这些测试在初级和二级医疗中心的可及性有限,限制了它们在紧急情况下的应用。因此,迫切需要一种替代的、快速的、可靠的检测来显著降低发病率。本研究旨在评价白细胞酯酶(LE)和葡萄糖试剂条试验在脓毒性关节炎早期诊断中的作用。方法:本横断面研究纳入了75例非外伤性关节积液患者。关节穿刺后,进行床边LE和葡萄糖条试验,同时进行滑液培养和分析。结果:75例患者中,25例(33.3%)经标准诊断试验诊断为脓毒性关节炎。LE条试验敏感性92%,特异性70%,阳性预测值(PPV) 60%,阴性预测值(NPV) 94%。葡萄糖试纸的敏感性为88%,特异性为76%,PPV为67%,NPV为93%。两种检测方法的敏感性为84%,特异性为88%,PPV为77.8%,NPV为91.7%。葡萄糖试纸的诊断准确率为80%,LE试纸的诊断准确率为77.3%,综合结果的诊断准确率为86.7%。结论:LE和葡萄糖条试验是快速诊断脓毒性关节炎的有效床边评估方法。结合两种条带检测的结果比单独检测产生更高的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid bedside testing for septic arthritis: evaluating cost-effective diagnostic tools.

Introduction: Diagnosing septic arthritis through synovial fluid culture and analysis can be time-consuming, and the limited accessibility of these tests in primary and secondary healthcare centers restricts their utility in emergency situations. Therefore, there is a pressing need for an alternative, rapid, and reliable test to significantly reduce morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leucocyte esterase (LE) and glucose reagent strip tests for the early diagnosis of septic arthritis.

Methodology: This cross-sectional study included 75 individuals presenting with atraumatic native joint effusion. Following arthrocentesis, bedside LE and glucose strip testing were performed, along with synovial fluid culture and analysis.

Results: Out of the 75 cases, 25 (33.3%) were diagnosed with septic arthritis based on standard diagnostic tests. The LE strip test showed a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. The glucose strip test demonstrated a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 76%, PPV of 67%, and NPV of 93%. Combining the two tests resulted in a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 77.8%, and NPV of 91.7%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 80% for the glucose strip test, 77.3% for the LE strip test, and 86.7% for the combined results.

Conclusions: The LE and glucose strip tests are cost-effective bedside assessments for the rapid diagnosis of septic arthritis. Combining the results from both strip tests yielded greater diagnostic accuracy than each one alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信