宝石光谱成像CT初步定量分析:鉴别小肝转移(< 3cm)的应用价值分析与探讨。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Qin Feng, Yao Hu, Qiuxia Wang, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li, Hao Tang
{"title":"宝石光谱成像CT初步定量分析:鉴别小肝转移(< 3cm)的应用价值分析与探讨。","authors":"Qin Feng, Yao Hu, Qiuxia Wang, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li, Hao Tang","doi":"10.1177/09287329251360091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHepatic metastases are the most common malignant tumors in the liver. Conventional contrast-enhanced CT examinations face challenges in distinguishing between benign and malignant atypical metastatic liver lesions with a diameter <3 cm, and evaluating their therapeutic efficacy remains particularly difficult.ObjectiveTo assess the clinical value of quantitative iodine analysis and spectral curves for diagnosing and differentiating liver metastases using gemstone spectral CT.MethodsAmong 915 patients with suspected hepatic metastases, 140 cases (87 males, 53 females) were pathologically confirmed. Primary malignancies included colorectal cancer (41 cases), gastric cancer (21 cases), lung cancer (35 cases), pancreatic cancer (31 cases), and breast cancer (12 cases). A total of 425 small lesions (<3 cm) were detected. CT values at lesion centers and peripheries were measured and compared against normal liver parenchyma. Quantitative iodine concentrations and spectral curve slopes were analyzed to evaluate differences in small hepatic metastases originating from distinct primary malignanciesResultsIn the differentiation of hepatic metastatic subtypes, mean CT values demonstrated diagnostic utility in distinguishing colorectal cancer from gastric in AP (Arterial Phase, P = 0.001) in the Center of lesions.On the contrary, the quantitative analysis of focus edge iodine reliably distinguished the AP (P < 0.000), lung cancer (P = 0.023) and pancreatic cancer (P < 0.000) of colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. The results have statistical significance.ConclusionsGSI(Gemstone spectral Imaging)-derived spectral curve slope and quantitative iodine analysis may facilitate differential diagnosis of small hepatic metastatic lesions with diverse primary origins, especially the source of colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251360091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial quantitative analysis of gemstone spectral imaging CT: Analysis and discussion of the application value for the differentiation of small liver metastases (<3 cm).\",\"authors\":\"Qin Feng, Yao Hu, Qiuxia Wang, Daoyu Hu, Zhen Li, Hao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251360091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundHepatic metastases are the most common malignant tumors in the liver. Conventional contrast-enhanced CT examinations face challenges in distinguishing between benign and malignant atypical metastatic liver lesions with a diameter <3 cm, and evaluating their therapeutic efficacy remains particularly difficult.ObjectiveTo assess the clinical value of quantitative iodine analysis and spectral curves for diagnosing and differentiating liver metastases using gemstone spectral CT.MethodsAmong 915 patients with suspected hepatic metastases, 140 cases (87 males, 53 females) were pathologically confirmed. Primary malignancies included colorectal cancer (41 cases), gastric cancer (21 cases), lung cancer (35 cases), pancreatic cancer (31 cases), and breast cancer (12 cases). A total of 425 small lesions (<3 cm) were detected. CT values at lesion centers and peripheries were measured and compared against normal liver parenchyma. Quantitative iodine concentrations and spectral curve slopes were analyzed to evaluate differences in small hepatic metastases originating from distinct primary malignanciesResultsIn the differentiation of hepatic metastatic subtypes, mean CT values demonstrated diagnostic utility in distinguishing colorectal cancer from gastric in AP (Arterial Phase, P = 0.001) in the Center of lesions.On the contrary, the quantitative analysis of focus edge iodine reliably distinguished the AP (P < 0.000), lung cancer (P = 0.023) and pancreatic cancer (P < 0.000) of colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. The results have statistical significance.ConclusionsGSI(Gemstone spectral Imaging)-derived spectral curve slope and quantitative iodine analysis may facilitate differential diagnosis of small hepatic metastatic lesions with diverse primary origins, especially the source of colorectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251360091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251360091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251360091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝转移瘤是肝脏最常见的恶性肿瘤。传统的增强CT检查在鉴别良恶性非典型肝转移病变方面面临挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial quantitative analysis of gemstone spectral imaging CT: Analysis and discussion of the application value for the differentiation of small liver metastases (<3 cm).

BackgroundHepatic metastases are the most common malignant tumors in the liver. Conventional contrast-enhanced CT examinations face challenges in distinguishing between benign and malignant atypical metastatic liver lesions with a diameter <3 cm, and evaluating their therapeutic efficacy remains particularly difficult.ObjectiveTo assess the clinical value of quantitative iodine analysis and spectral curves for diagnosing and differentiating liver metastases using gemstone spectral CT.MethodsAmong 915 patients with suspected hepatic metastases, 140 cases (87 males, 53 females) were pathologically confirmed. Primary malignancies included colorectal cancer (41 cases), gastric cancer (21 cases), lung cancer (35 cases), pancreatic cancer (31 cases), and breast cancer (12 cases). A total of 425 small lesions (<3 cm) were detected. CT values at lesion centers and peripheries were measured and compared against normal liver parenchyma. Quantitative iodine concentrations and spectral curve slopes were analyzed to evaluate differences in small hepatic metastases originating from distinct primary malignanciesResultsIn the differentiation of hepatic metastatic subtypes, mean CT values demonstrated diagnostic utility in distinguishing colorectal cancer from gastric in AP (Arterial Phase, P = 0.001) in the Center of lesions.On the contrary, the quantitative analysis of focus edge iodine reliably distinguished the AP (P < 0.000), lung cancer (P = 0.023) and pancreatic cancer (P < 0.000) of colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. The results have statistical significance.ConclusionsGSI(Gemstone spectral Imaging)-derived spectral curve slope and quantitative iodine analysis may facilitate differential diagnosis of small hepatic metastatic lesions with diverse primary origins, especially the source of colorectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信