“我宁愿少开处方”:对抗精神病药物和挑战行为的看法。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Caitlin Norris-Grey, Aileen Carmen
{"title":"“我宁愿少开处方”:对抗精神病药物和挑战行为的看法。","authors":"Caitlin Norris-Grey, Aileen Carmen","doi":"10.1177/17446295251362348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities affects quality of life and often results in antipsychotic use, despite guidelines recommending non-drug approaches as the first line. This study explores healthcare team perspectives on managing challenging behaviour, barriers to reducing antipsychotic overprescription, and possible solutions. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis of an online team discussion and survey. Findings were used to develop a driver diagram of proposed strategies. <b>Results:</b> Three themes were identified: (1) varied views on current prescribing practices, with concerns about overuse and limited awareness of guidance; (2) key barriers including staffing shortages, reluctance to reduce medication, poor communication, lack of structured reviews, and absence of outcome measures; and (3) proposed solutions such as family involvement, regular reviews, improved outcome tracking, staff education, and clear care pathways. <b>Conclusion:</b> Addressing system-level barriers through coordinated team-based approaches may reduce reliance on antipsychotics and improve care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295251362348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I would prefer to be prescribing less\\\": Perceptions on antipsychotics and challenging behaviour.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin Norris-Grey, Aileen Carmen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17446295251362348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities affects quality of life and often results in antipsychotic use, despite guidelines recommending non-drug approaches as the first line. This study explores healthcare team perspectives on managing challenging behaviour, barriers to reducing antipsychotic overprescription, and possible solutions. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis of an online team discussion and survey. Findings were used to develop a driver diagram of proposed strategies. <b>Results:</b> Three themes were identified: (1) varied views on current prescribing practices, with concerns about overuse and limited awareness of guidance; (2) key barriers including staffing shortages, reluctance to reduce medication, poor communication, lack of structured reviews, and absence of outcome measures; and (3) proposed solutions such as family involvement, regular reviews, improved outcome tracking, staff education, and clear care pathways. <b>Conclusion:</b> Addressing system-level barriers through coordinated team-based approaches may reduce reliance on antipsychotics and improve care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17446295251362348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251362348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251362348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管指南建议将非药物作为一线治疗方法,但智力残疾患者的挑战性行为会影响生活质量,并经常导致抗精神病药物的使用。本研究探讨了医疗团队对管理具有挑战性行为的观点,减少抗精神病药物过度处方的障碍,以及可能的解决方案。方法:采用专题分析的横断面定性研究在线小组讨论和调查。研究结果被用于制定拟议战略的驱动图。结果:确定了三个主题:(1)对当前处方实践的不同看法,关注过度使用和指导意识有限;(2)主要障碍包括人员短缺、不愿减少用药、沟通不畅、缺乏结构化审查和缺乏结果测量;(3)提出了家庭参与、定期评估、改进结果跟踪、员工教育和明确护理路径等解决方案。结论:通过团队协作的方法解决系统层面的障碍可以减少对抗精神病药物的依赖并改善护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"I would prefer to be prescribing less": Perceptions on antipsychotics and challenging behaviour.

Aims: Challenging behaviour in individuals with intellectual disabilities affects quality of life and often results in antipsychotic use, despite guidelines recommending non-drug approaches as the first line. This study explores healthcare team perspectives on managing challenging behaviour, barriers to reducing antipsychotic overprescription, and possible solutions. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study using thematic analysis of an online team discussion and survey. Findings were used to develop a driver diagram of proposed strategies. Results: Three themes were identified: (1) varied views on current prescribing practices, with concerns about overuse and limited awareness of guidance; (2) key barriers including staffing shortages, reluctance to reduce medication, poor communication, lack of structured reviews, and absence of outcome measures; and (3) proposed solutions such as family involvement, regular reviews, improved outcome tracking, staff education, and clear care pathways. Conclusion: Addressing system-level barriers through coordinated team-based approaches may reduce reliance on antipsychotics and improve care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信