Prof Rowan H Harwood MD , Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan PhD , Afsan Bhadelia PhD , Andrea Foebel PhD , Catriona R Mayland MD , Chetna Malhotra MD , Prof Deborah Blacker MD , Prof Elizabeth L Sampson MD , Prof Eric Andrew Finkelstein PhD , Harmehr Sekhon PhD , Prof Jean Woo MD , Prof Jenny T van der Steen PhD , Prof Julia Verne PhD , Prof Leon Geffen MBChB , Lieve Van den Block PhD , Mayaline Youssef MSc , Megan Doherty MD , Moise Muzigaba PhD , Muthoni Gichu MB , Sarah Hopkins MB , Anshu Banerjee PhD
{"title":"在联合国健康老龄化十年期间衡量和监测死亡质量。","authors":"Prof Rowan H Harwood MD , Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan PhD , Afsan Bhadelia PhD , Andrea Foebel PhD , Catriona R Mayland MD , Chetna Malhotra MD , Prof Deborah Blacker MD , Prof Elizabeth L Sampson MD , Prof Eric Andrew Finkelstein PhD , Harmehr Sekhon PhD , Prof Jean Woo MD , Prof Jenny T van der Steen PhD , Prof Julia Verne PhD , Prof Leon Geffen MBChB , Lieve Van den Block PhD , Mayaline Youssef MSc , Megan Doherty MD , Moise Muzigaba PhD , Muthoni Gichu MB , Sarah Hopkins MB , Anshu Banerjee PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>WHO aims to identify metrics to monitor the quality of dying, complementing those indicators proposed under the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing. However, the proposed criteria for a good death are contentious. Needs and priorities vary between individuals and their carers, across conditions, over time, and across communities and cultures. Monitoring should also consider sudden or rapid deaths and assisted dying. Fundamental challenges in data collection include who reports, over what timeframe, and when. This Personal View explores these challenges, identifying potentially measurable indicators and ambiguities in their use, and offers recommendations towards a practical measurement framework. We aimed to define a concise, meaningful, and pragmatic set of indicators that could be collected and applied universally across countries and over time. We define a logic model of candidate variables at different conceptual levels and describe an empirical exercise for prioritising and operationalising these variables for measurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"6 7","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring and monitoring the quality of dying in the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing\",\"authors\":\"Prof Rowan H Harwood MD , Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan PhD , Afsan Bhadelia PhD , Andrea Foebel PhD , Catriona R Mayland MD , Chetna Malhotra MD , Prof Deborah Blacker MD , Prof Elizabeth L Sampson MD , Prof Eric Andrew Finkelstein PhD , Harmehr Sekhon PhD , Prof Jean Woo MD , Prof Jenny T van der Steen PhD , Prof Julia Verne PhD , Prof Leon Geffen MBChB , Lieve Van den Block PhD , Mayaline Youssef MSc , Megan Doherty MD , Moise Muzigaba PhD , Muthoni Gichu MB , Sarah Hopkins MB , Anshu Banerjee PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>WHO aims to identify metrics to monitor the quality of dying, complementing those indicators proposed under the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing. However, the proposed criteria for a good death are contentious. Needs and priorities vary between individuals and their carers, across conditions, over time, and across communities and cultures. Monitoring should also consider sudden or rapid deaths and assisted dying. Fundamental challenges in data collection include who reports, over what timeframe, and when. This Personal View explores these challenges, identifying potentially measurable indicators and ambiguities in their use, and offers recommendations towards a practical measurement framework. We aimed to define a concise, meaningful, and pragmatic set of indicators that could be collected and applied universally across countries and over time. We define a logic model of candidate variables at different conceptual levels and describe an empirical exercise for prioritising and operationalising these variables for measurement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756825000583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756825000583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring and monitoring the quality of dying in the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing
WHO aims to identify metrics to monitor the quality of dying, complementing those indicators proposed under the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing. However, the proposed criteria for a good death are contentious. Needs and priorities vary between individuals and their carers, across conditions, over time, and across communities and cultures. Monitoring should also consider sudden or rapid deaths and assisted dying. Fundamental challenges in data collection include who reports, over what timeframe, and when. This Personal View explores these challenges, identifying potentially measurable indicators and ambiguities in their use, and offers recommendations towards a practical measurement framework. We aimed to define a concise, meaningful, and pragmatic set of indicators that could be collected and applied universally across countries and over time. We define a logic model of candidate variables at different conceptual levels and describe an empirical exercise for prioritising and operationalising these variables for measurement.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.