与传统的过滤血液相比,富含新细胞的血液并不能为红细胞提供生存优势。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-07-27 DOI:10.1111/vox.70085
Adriaan Meyer, Heather Hendrickse, Glenda Mary Davison
{"title":"与传统的过滤血液相比,富含新细胞的血液并不能为红细胞提供生存优势。","authors":"Adriaan Meyer, Heather Hendrickse, Glenda Mary Davison","doi":"10.1111/vox.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) concentrates are stored at 1-6°C for up to 42 days, but storage lesions can lead to wastage. Pooled neocytes may extend RBC shelf-life, benefiting patients who require frequent transfusions. This study aimed to improve the longevity of stored RBCs by isolating neocytes and comparing the rate of haemolysis, biochemical changes and viability with filtered blood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty filtered units were processed. Neocytes were extracted and enriched with saline-adenine- glucose-mannitol. Both filtered and neocyte-enriched units were stored for 42 days. Samples were analysed every 14 days for RBC count, mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), haemoglobin, sodium and supernatant haemolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in red cell count between filtered and neocyte-enriched units (p = 0.27). Both types showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased MCHC over the 42 days, with no significant differences observed (p ≥ 0.05). Sodium levels in the supernatant decreased while percentage supernatant haemolysis increased steadily in both units, albeit without significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). The haemoglobin remained stable for both unit types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, neocyte-enriched blood did not demonstrate any longevity advantage compared to pre-stored leucocyte-reduced RBCs using the conventional manual collection method. These findings align with previous studies using various neocyte collection methods. Feasibility was highlighted as the main challenge, as many of these methods have proven too expensive and laborious.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neocyte-enriched blood does not provide a survival advantage for red cells when compared to conventional filtered blood.\",\"authors\":\"Adriaan Meyer, Heather Hendrickse, Glenda Mary Davison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.70085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) concentrates are stored at 1-6°C for up to 42 days, but storage lesions can lead to wastage. Pooled neocytes may extend RBC shelf-life, benefiting patients who require frequent transfusions. This study aimed to improve the longevity of stored RBCs by isolating neocytes and comparing the rate of haemolysis, biochemical changes and viability with filtered blood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty filtered units were processed. Neocytes were extracted and enriched with saline-adenine- glucose-mannitol. Both filtered and neocyte-enriched units were stored for 42 days. Samples were analysed every 14 days for RBC count, mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), haemoglobin, sodium and supernatant haemolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in red cell count between filtered and neocyte-enriched units (p = 0.27). Both types showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased MCHC over the 42 days, with no significant differences observed (p ≥ 0.05). Sodium levels in the supernatant decreased while percentage supernatant haemolysis increased steadily in both units, albeit without significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). The haemoglobin remained stable for both unit types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, neocyte-enriched blood did not demonstrate any longevity advantage compared to pre-stored leucocyte-reduced RBCs using the conventional manual collection method. These findings align with previous studies using various neocyte collection methods. Feasibility was highlighted as the main challenge, as many of these methods have proven too expensive and laborious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70085\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:红细胞(RBC)浓缩物在1-6°C下储存长达42天,但储存病变可导致浪费。汇集的新细胞可以延长红细胞的保质期,对需要频繁输血的患者有益。本研究旨在通过分离新细胞并比较溶血率、生化变化和滤过血液的活力来提高储存红细胞的寿命。材料和方法:处理30个过滤单元。提取新生细胞,用盐-腺嘌呤-葡萄糖-甘露醇富集。滤过的和富集新细胞的细胞均保存42天。每14天对样品进行红细胞计数、平均细胞体积(MCV)、平均细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)、血红蛋白、钠和上清溶血分析。结果:滤过红细胞和富集红细胞的红细胞计数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.27)。在42 d内,两种类型的平均红细胞体积均增加,MCHC均降低,差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。两个单位的上清液中钠含量下降,而上清溶血百分比稳步上升,但无显著差异(p≥0.05)。两种单位类型的血红蛋白保持稳定。结论:总的来说,与使用传统手工收集方法预先储存的白细胞减少的红细胞相比,富集新细胞的血液没有表现出任何长寿优势。这些发现与先前使用各种新细胞收集方法的研究一致。可行性被强调为主要挑战,因为许多这些方法已被证明过于昂贵和费力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neocyte-enriched blood does not provide a survival advantage for red cells when compared to conventional filtered blood.

Background and objectives: Red blood cell (RBC) concentrates are stored at 1-6°C for up to 42 days, but storage lesions can lead to wastage. Pooled neocytes may extend RBC shelf-life, benefiting patients who require frequent transfusions. This study aimed to improve the longevity of stored RBCs by isolating neocytes and comparing the rate of haemolysis, biochemical changes and viability with filtered blood.

Materials and methods: Thirty filtered units were processed. Neocytes were extracted and enriched with saline-adenine- glucose-mannitol. Both filtered and neocyte-enriched units were stored for 42 days. Samples were analysed every 14 days for RBC count, mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), haemoglobin, sodium and supernatant haemolysis.

Results: There was no significant difference in red cell count between filtered and neocyte-enriched units (p = 0.27). Both types showed increased mean corpuscular volume and decreased MCHC over the 42 days, with no significant differences observed (p ≥ 0.05). Sodium levels in the supernatant decreased while percentage supernatant haemolysis increased steadily in both units, albeit without significant differences (p ≥ 0.05). The haemoglobin remained stable for both unit types.

Conclusion: Overall, neocyte-enriched blood did not demonstrate any longevity advantage compared to pre-stored leucocyte-reduced RBCs using the conventional manual collection method. These findings align with previous studies using various neocyte collection methods. Feasibility was highlighted as the main challenge, as many of these methods have proven too expensive and laborious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信