Gustavo Schlindwein, Sarah Ribeiro Krasilchik, Natalia Rigo, Caroline Pellis, Juliana Bona Preisler, Natália Rampon Cendron, José Cristani, Sandra Davi Traverso
{"title":"饮水模型对苗期仔猪生长性能、水分利用和粪便量的影响。","authors":"Gustavo Schlindwein, Sarah Ribeiro Krasilchik, Natalia Rigo, Caroline Pellis, Juliana Bona Preisler, Natália Rampon Cendron, José Cristani, Sandra Davi Traverso","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The water fasting period and the volume of water wasted during the nursery phase are directly related to the type of water fountain used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare different water fountain models regarding total water consumption, waste production, and growth performance of piglets on a commercial farm during the nursery phase. A total of 1,104 animals were divided into 3 experimental treatments: Treatment 1-Automatic bowl drinker (ABD2) model containing 2 drinkers per pen. Treatment 2 - (ABD4) the same model as T1, but with 4 drinkers per pen. Treatment 3-Swing nipple drinker (SND4) model with 4 drinkers per pen. Water usage at the drinkers (L/pig/day) was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The water-to-feed ratio was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The water-to-weight gain ratio was also higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Regarding waste production, ABD2 and ABD4 presented lower volumes than SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, liquid manure in ABD2 and ABD4 had a higher total solids content than SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation in body weight at the end of the experiment was lower in ABD4 than in SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and equal to ABD2 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Daily weight gain was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and equal to ABD4 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The ABD used in this study resulted in lower total water consumption, and consequently lower manure volume produced. Additionally, the animals reached their final weight more uniformly in the pen, and there was no difference in growth performance when the number of animals per drinker was the same among treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the drinker model on growth performance, water use and manure volume for piglets during the nursery phase.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Schlindwein, Sarah Ribeiro Krasilchik, Natalia Rigo, Caroline Pellis, Juliana Bona Preisler, Natália Rampon Cendron, José Cristani, Sandra Davi Traverso\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The water fasting period and the volume of water wasted during the nursery phase are directly related to the type of water fountain used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare different water fountain models regarding total water consumption, waste production, and growth performance of piglets on a commercial farm during the nursery phase. A total of 1,104 animals were divided into 3 experimental treatments: Treatment 1-Automatic bowl drinker (ABD2) model containing 2 drinkers per pen. Treatment 2 - (ABD4) the same model as T1, but with 4 drinkers per pen. Treatment 3-Swing nipple drinker (SND4) model with 4 drinkers per pen. Water usage at the drinkers (L/pig/day) was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The water-to-feed ratio was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The water-to-weight gain ratio was also higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Regarding waste production, ABD2 and ABD4 presented lower volumes than SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, liquid manure in ABD2 and ABD4 had a higher total solids content than SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation in body weight at the end of the experiment was lower in ABD4 than in SND4 (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and equal to ABD2 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Daily weight gain was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and equal to ABD4 (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The ABD used in this study resulted in lower total water consumption, and consequently lower manure volume produced. Additionally, the animals reached their final weight more uniformly in the pen, and there was no difference in growth performance when the number of animals per drinker was the same among treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
苗圃期的断水期和浪费的水量与使用的饮水机类型直接相关。因此,本研究旨在比较不同饮水机模型在商业农场仔猪保育阶段的总耗水量、废物产生量和生长性能。将1104只动物分为3个实验处理:处理1-自动饮水器(ABD2)模型,每栏2只饮水器。处理2 - (ABD4)与T1相同的模型,但每笔4个饮酒者。治疗3-摆动乳头饮器(SND4)模型,每个笔4个饮器。SND4饲粮的耗水量(L/猪/d)高于ABD2和ABD4饲粮(P P P P P > 0.05)。SND4组的日增重高于ABD2组(P < 0.05)。本研究中使用的ABD降低了总耗水量,从而减少了粪便产量。此外,动物在围栏内达到最终体重的均匀性更强,当每个饮水者的动物数量相同时,不同处理的生长性能没有差异。
Effect of the drinker model on growth performance, water use and manure volume for piglets during the nursery phase.
The water fasting period and the volume of water wasted during the nursery phase are directly related to the type of water fountain used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare different water fountain models regarding total water consumption, waste production, and growth performance of piglets on a commercial farm during the nursery phase. A total of 1,104 animals were divided into 3 experimental treatments: Treatment 1-Automatic bowl drinker (ABD2) model containing 2 drinkers per pen. Treatment 2 - (ABD4) the same model as T1, but with 4 drinkers per pen. Treatment 3-Swing nipple drinker (SND4) model with 4 drinkers per pen. Water usage at the drinkers (L/pig/day) was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (P < 0.0001). The water-to-feed ratio was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (P < 0.0001). The water-to-weight gain ratio was also higher in SND4 than in ABD2 and ABD4 (P < 0.0001). Regarding waste production, ABD2 and ABD4 presented lower volumes than SND4 (P < 0.0001). Additionally, liquid manure in ABD2 and ABD4 had a higher total solids content than SND4 (P < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation in body weight at the end of the experiment was lower in ABD4 than in SND4 (P < 0.05) and equal to ABD2 (P > 0.05). Daily weight gain was higher in SND4 than in ABD2 (P < 0.05) and equal to ABD4 (P > 0.05). The ABD used in this study resulted in lower total water consumption, and consequently lower manure volume produced. Additionally, the animals reached their final weight more uniformly in the pen, and there was no difference in growth performance when the number of animals per drinker was the same among treatments.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.