灌木林和高山桉树林在深层土壤上表现出相似的抗旱性。

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Jenickson R S Costa, Jhuan L M Maciel, Magali R Silva, Otávio C Campoe, Guerric le Maire, Clayton A Alvares, Nicolas K Martin-StPaul, Paulo Bittencourt, Luciano Pereira, Leticia B Cagnoni, Jean-Paul Laclau, Yann Nouvellon, Sonia M F Ustulin, Joannès Guillemot
{"title":"灌木林和高山桉树林在深层土壤上表现出相似的抗旱性。","authors":"Jenickson R S Costa, Jhuan L M Maciel, Magali R Silva, Otávio C Campoe, Guerric le Maire, Clayton A Alvares, Nicolas K Martin-StPaul, Paulo Bittencourt, Luciano Pereira, Leticia B Cagnoni, Jean-Paul Laclau, Yann Nouvellon, Sonia M F Ustulin, Joannès Guillemot","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing drought under climate change is affecting forests worldwide, raising concerns about management strategies for sustainable wood production. Eucalyptus, the dominant genus in hardwood plantations, can be managed as either coppice or high forest stands, yet the effects of this silvicultural decision on water stress and drought resistance remain largely unexplored. If coppice trees experience reduced water stress during their early growth due to the surviving deep root apparatus from the previous rotation, they may exhibit traits that are less adapted to drought survival. Here, we measured structural stand features (leaf area index, LAI; standing biomass), dehydration-resistance traits (leaf turgor loss point, Ψtlp; xylem vulnerability to embolism, Ψ50), in situ water stress (minimum leaf water potential, Ψmin) and metrics of drought-mortality risk (hydraulic safety margins, HSM) to compare the drought resistance and productivity of 10 Eucalyptus clones growing in deep soils under both high forest and coppice silvicultural treatments in a common garden in southeastern Brazil. Biomass at mid-rotation (3 years after planting) was on average 15% greater in coppice stands, associated with a 32% greater LAI across Eucalyptus clones. Standing biomass of clones grown in coppice could not be predicted from that of high forests. Water stress, drought resistance traits and drought-mortality risks were similar between silvicultural treatments. Some traits (LAI, Ψtlp, Ψ50, Ψtlp-based HSM) exhibited a consistent clonal ranking in both silvicultural treatments, while other traits (Ψmin, Ψmin-based HSM) did not. The hydraulic system of Eucalyptus trees does not plastically respond to coppicing, making coppice a viable option for Eucalyptus management under drought, if appropriate clonal selection is implemented. However, selecting drought-resistant and productive coppice clones based on high forest data should be considered with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coppice and high forest Eucalyptus stands show similar drought resistance on deep soils.\",\"authors\":\"Jenickson R S Costa, Jhuan L M Maciel, Magali R Silva, Otávio C Campoe, Guerric le Maire, Clayton A Alvares, Nicolas K Martin-StPaul, Paulo Bittencourt, Luciano Pereira, Leticia B Cagnoni, Jean-Paul Laclau, Yann Nouvellon, Sonia M F Ustulin, Joannès Guillemot\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/treephys/tpaf089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing drought under climate change is affecting forests worldwide, raising concerns about management strategies for sustainable wood production. Eucalyptus, the dominant genus in hardwood plantations, can be managed as either coppice or high forest stands, yet the effects of this silvicultural decision on water stress and drought resistance remain largely unexplored. If coppice trees experience reduced water stress during their early growth due to the surviving deep root apparatus from the previous rotation, they may exhibit traits that are less adapted to drought survival. Here, we measured structural stand features (leaf area index, LAI; standing biomass), dehydration-resistance traits (leaf turgor loss point, Ψtlp; xylem vulnerability to embolism, Ψ50), in situ water stress (minimum leaf water potential, Ψmin) and metrics of drought-mortality risk (hydraulic safety margins, HSM) to compare the drought resistance and productivity of 10 Eucalyptus clones growing in deep soils under both high forest and coppice silvicultural treatments in a common garden in southeastern Brazil. Biomass at mid-rotation (3 years after planting) was on average 15% greater in coppice stands, associated with a 32% greater LAI across Eucalyptus clones. Standing biomass of clones grown in coppice could not be predicted from that of high forests. Water stress, drought resistance traits and drought-mortality risks were similar between silvicultural treatments. Some traits (LAI, Ψtlp, Ψ50, Ψtlp-based HSM) exhibited a consistent clonal ranking in both silvicultural treatments, while other traits (Ψmin, Ψmin-based HSM) did not. The hydraulic system of Eucalyptus trees does not plastically respond to coppicing, making coppice a viable option for Eucalyptus management under drought, if appropriate clonal selection is implemented. However, selecting drought-resistant and productive coppice clones based on high forest data should be considered with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化下日益严重的干旱正在影响全世界的森林,引起人们对可持续木材生产管理战略的关注。桉树是硬木人工林的优势属,可以作为矮林或高林进行管理,但这种造林决策对水分胁迫和抗旱性的影响在很大程度上仍未被探索。如果在早期生长过程中,由于先前轮作中幸存的深根器官而减少了水分胁迫,那么它们可能会表现出不太适应干旱生存的特征。在这里,我们测量了林分结构特征(叶面积指数,LAI;直立生物量)、抗脱水性状(叶膨落点,Ψtlp;木质部栓塞脆弱性,Ψ50),原位水分胁迫(最小叶水势,Ψmin)和干旱死亡风险指标(水力安全边际),以比较巴西东南部一个普通公园中生长在深层土壤中的10个桉树无性系在高林和灌木林两种造林处理下的抗旱性和生产力。轮作中期(种植后3年),灌木林的生物量平均增加15%,桉树无性系的LAI平均增加32%。林下无性系的立木生物量不能用高林的立木生物量来预测。水分胁迫、抗旱性状和干旱死亡风险在造林处理之间相似。一些性状(LAI, Ψtlp, Ψ50, Ψtlp-based HSM)在两种造林处理中表现出一致的克隆排名,而其他性状(Ψmin, Ψmin-based HSM)则不一致。桉树的液压系统对砍伐没有塑性反应,如果实施适当的无性系选择,使乔木成为干旱条件下桉树管理的可行选择。但是,根据高森林数据选择抗旱和高产的灌木林无性系时应谨慎考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coppice and high forest Eucalyptus stands show similar drought resistance on deep soils.

Increasing drought under climate change is affecting forests worldwide, raising concerns about management strategies for sustainable wood production. Eucalyptus, the dominant genus in hardwood plantations, can be managed as either coppice or high forest stands, yet the effects of this silvicultural decision on water stress and drought resistance remain largely unexplored. If coppice trees experience reduced water stress during their early growth due to the surviving deep root apparatus from the previous rotation, they may exhibit traits that are less adapted to drought survival. Here, we measured structural stand features (leaf area index, LAI; standing biomass), dehydration-resistance traits (leaf turgor loss point, Ψtlp; xylem vulnerability to embolism, Ψ50), in situ water stress (minimum leaf water potential, Ψmin) and metrics of drought-mortality risk (hydraulic safety margins, HSM) to compare the drought resistance and productivity of 10 Eucalyptus clones growing in deep soils under both high forest and coppice silvicultural treatments in a common garden in southeastern Brazil. Biomass at mid-rotation (3 years after planting) was on average 15% greater in coppice stands, associated with a 32% greater LAI across Eucalyptus clones. Standing biomass of clones grown in coppice could not be predicted from that of high forests. Water stress, drought resistance traits and drought-mortality risks were similar between silvicultural treatments. Some traits (LAI, Ψtlp, Ψ50, Ψtlp-based HSM) exhibited a consistent clonal ranking in both silvicultural treatments, while other traits (Ψmin, Ψmin-based HSM) did not. The hydraulic system of Eucalyptus trees does not plastically respond to coppicing, making coppice a viable option for Eucalyptus management under drought, if appropriate clonal selection is implemented. However, selecting drought-resistant and productive coppice clones based on high forest data should be considered with caution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信