平面和竖向非对称钢筋混凝土建筑在定向地震荷载下的非线性响应分析。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya
{"title":"平面和竖向非对称钢筋混凝土建筑在定向地震荷载下的非线性响应分析。","authors":"Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear response analysis of plan and vertical asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings under directional seismic loadings.\",\"authors\":\"Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"27508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对平面和竖向不对称钢筋混凝土建筑在定向地震力作用下进行了非线性动力分析。数学模型是为建立模型而建立的。建筑的平面不对称是通过施加6米、12米和18米的单轴偏心率来引入的。竖向质量和刚度的不对称性是通过竖向质量和刚度的变化而产生的。计算了峰值位移和层间位移比。不对称建筑对地震力的脆弱性增加到一个特定的偏心。与刚度和质量不对称的建筑相比,底层刚度不对称和顶层质量不对称的建筑在所有地震和研究角度下都表现出更大的响应。研究了平面对称和垂直对称建筑在单向地震力作用下的峰值响应。平面非对称结构在Y方向上的峰值位移为80 mm。非对称结构的竖向刚度在Y方向的峰值响应为300 mm。顶部质量不对称的建筑在Y方向上显示为199.18 mm。作者建议对非对称结构的设计和分析进行详细的分析,特别是对材料失效的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonlinear response analysis of plan and vertical asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings under directional seismic loadings.

A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信