Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya
{"title":"平面和竖向非对称钢筋混凝土建筑在定向地震荷载下的非线性响应分析。","authors":"Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear response analysis of plan and vertical asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings under directional seismic loadings.\",\"authors\":\"Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"27508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12737-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nonlinear response analysis of plan and vertical asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings under directional seismic loadings.
A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.