Tyler G Erath, Fang Fang Chen, Michael DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins
{"title":"2002-2019年美国农村和性别青少年吸烟率调查","authors":"Tyler G Erath, Fang Fang Chen, Michael DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine changes in cigarette smoking prevalence among US adolescents by rural-urban residence, gender, and time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared trends in smoking prevalence by rural-urban residence and gender using 18 years of cross-sectional data (2002-2019) from 298,530 respondents aged 12-17 in the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The two primary outcomes were past-month and daily smoking prevalence. Weighted logistic regression models tested whether smoking prevalence varied by rural-urban residence, gender, and time along with two-way and three-way interactions of these variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Past-month and daily smoking declined over time for all four rural-urban residence and gender combinations. Regarding past-month smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p < .001) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.86; 95 %CI = 0.85,0.87) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.82,0.84). A significant gender by time interaction (p < .001) was also observed. The rate of decline was faster among females (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.81,0.83) versus males (AOR = 0.85; 95 %CI = 0.84,0.86) with prevalence initially higher (2002-2003) yet ending lower (2018-2019) among females. Regarding daily smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p = .005) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.80,0.85) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.79; 95 %CI = 0.78,0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide novel evidence of shrinking yet persistent rural disparities in both past-month and daily smoking, and less declines in past-month smoking among males over time. Together, findings support continued need for tobacco control and regulatory efforts to reduce adolescent smoking and specific efforts to reduce rural and gender disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining US adolescent cigarette smoking prevalence by rurality and gender, 2002-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler G Erath, Fang Fang Chen, Michael DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine changes in cigarette smoking prevalence among US adolescents by rural-urban residence, gender, and time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared trends in smoking prevalence by rural-urban residence and gender using 18 years of cross-sectional data (2002-2019) from 298,530 respondents aged 12-17 in the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The two primary outcomes were past-month and daily smoking prevalence. Weighted logistic regression models tested whether smoking prevalence varied by rural-urban residence, gender, and time along with two-way and three-way interactions of these variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Past-month and daily smoking declined over time for all four rural-urban residence and gender combinations. Regarding past-month smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p < .001) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.86; 95 %CI = 0.85,0.87) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.82,0.84). A significant gender by time interaction (p < .001) was also observed. The rate of decline was faster among females (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.81,0.83) versus males (AOR = 0.85; 95 %CI = 0.84,0.86) with prevalence initially higher (2002-2003) yet ending lower (2018-2019) among females. Regarding daily smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p = .005) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.80,0.85) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.79; 95 %CI = 0.78,0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide novel evidence of shrinking yet persistent rural disparities in both past-month and daily smoking, and less declines in past-month smoking among males over time. Together, findings support continued need for tobacco control and regulatory efforts to reduce adolescent smoking and specific efforts to reduce rural and gender disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108377\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining US adolescent cigarette smoking prevalence by rurality and gender, 2002-2019.
Objective: Examine changes in cigarette smoking prevalence among US adolescents by rural-urban residence, gender, and time.
Methods: We compared trends in smoking prevalence by rural-urban residence and gender using 18 years of cross-sectional data (2002-2019) from 298,530 respondents aged 12-17 in the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The two primary outcomes were past-month and daily smoking prevalence. Weighted logistic regression models tested whether smoking prevalence varied by rural-urban residence, gender, and time along with two-way and three-way interactions of these variables.
Results: Past-month and daily smoking declined over time for all four rural-urban residence and gender combinations. Regarding past-month smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p < .001) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.86; 95 %CI = 0.85,0.87) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.82,0.84). A significant gender by time interaction (p < .001) was also observed. The rate of decline was faster among females (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.81,0.83) versus males (AOR = 0.85; 95 %CI = 0.84,0.86) with prevalence initially higher (2002-2003) yet ending lower (2018-2019) among females. Regarding daily smoking, there was a significant rural-urban residence by time interaction (p = .005) with higher prevalence and slower rates of decline among rural (AOR = 0.82; 95 %CI = 0.80,0.85) versus urban participants (AOR = 0.79; 95 %CI = 0.78,0.80).
Conclusions: Findings provide novel evidence of shrinking yet persistent rural disparities in both past-month and daily smoking, and less declines in past-month smoking among males over time. Together, findings support continued need for tobacco control and regulatory efforts to reduce adolescent smoking and specific efforts to reduce rural and gender disparities.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.