CHD-PEBBS的开发和验证:一种评估冠心病患者感知运动益处和障碍的量表。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S524436
Yu Liu, Linmei Feng, Luyao Wang, Hongyan Li, Hui Tu, Xin Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Lingzhu Zhang, Minhui Yang, Xin Sun, Tingting Huang, Yuxin Xiong
{"title":"CHD-PEBBS的开发和验证:一种评估冠心病患者感知运动益处和障碍的量表。","authors":"Yu Liu, Linmei Feng, Luyao Wang, Hongyan Li, Hui Tu, Xin Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Lingzhu Zhang, Minhui Yang, Xin Sun, Tingting Huang, Yuxin Xiong","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S524436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The level of perceived exercise benefits and barriers is one of the key influencing factors of cardiac exercise rehabilitation (CER). There is a lack of validated tools to assess coronary heart disease (CHD) patients' exercise perception.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a scale assessing CHD patients' perceived exercise benefits and barriers (CHD-PEBBS) and test its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 205 CHD patients were recruited for a cross-sectional survey. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to extract factors, delete items and evaluate construct validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability were used to test the reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the health belief model, this study developed a perceived benefits and barriers framework. CFA showed that the fit indices (such as χ<sup>2</sup>/df=2.281, CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.079) were all acceptable A total of 6 factors were extracted through EFA, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.52%. The perceived benefits subscale included 3 dimensions: \"improving physiological indicators\", \"improving quality of life\" and \"improving physiological function\" with a total of 12 items. The perceived barriers subscale also included 3 dimensions: \"lacking of exercise support\", \"worrying about adverse consequences\" and \"poor exercise experience or perception\" with a total of 10 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.917, and the test-retest reliability was 0.941.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CHD-PEBBS shows good reliability and validity, which may be used to evaluate the CER perception level of CHD patients, offering precise targets and pathways for exercise rehabilitation interventions in nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2147-2159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the CHD-PEBBS: A Scale to Assess Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers in Coronary Heart Disease Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu, Linmei Feng, Luyao Wang, Hongyan Li, Hui Tu, Xin Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Lingzhu Zhang, Minhui Yang, Xin Sun, Tingting Huang, Yuxin Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S524436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The level of perceived exercise benefits and barriers is one of the key influencing factors of cardiac exercise rehabilitation (CER). There is a lack of validated tools to assess coronary heart disease (CHD) patients' exercise perception.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a scale assessing CHD patients' perceived exercise benefits and barriers (CHD-PEBBS) and test its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 205 CHD patients were recruited for a cross-sectional survey. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to extract factors, delete items and evaluate construct validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability were used to test the reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the health belief model, this study developed a perceived benefits and barriers framework. CFA showed that the fit indices (such as χ<sup>2</sup>/df=2.281, CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.079) were all acceptable A total of 6 factors were extracted through EFA, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.52%. The perceived benefits subscale included 3 dimensions: \\\"improving physiological indicators\\\", \\\"improving quality of life\\\" and \\\"improving physiological function\\\" with a total of 12 items. The perceived barriers subscale also included 3 dimensions: \\\"lacking of exercise support\\\", \\\"worrying about adverse consequences\\\" and \\\"poor exercise experience or perception\\\" with a total of 10 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.917, and the test-retest reliability was 0.941.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CHD-PEBBS shows good reliability and validity, which may be used to evaluate the CER perception level of CHD patients, offering precise targets and pathways for exercise rehabilitation interventions in nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2147-2159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S524436\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S524436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动益处和障碍感知水平是影响心脏运动康复的关键因素之一。缺乏有效的工具来评估冠心病(CHD)患者的运动感知。目的:编制冠心病患者感知运动益处与障碍量表(CHD- pebbs),并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法:对205例冠心病患者进行横断面调查。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)提取因子、删除项目和评价构念效度。采用Cronbach’s alpha系数和重测信度来检验量表的信度。结果:基于健康信念模型,本研究建立了一个感知利益和障碍框架。CFA分析结果表明,拟合指标(χ2/df=2.281, CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.079)均可接受,EFA共提取6个因素,累积方差贡献率为75.52%。感知效益子量表包括“改善生理指标”、“改善生活质量”和“改善生理功能”3个维度,共12个项目。感知障碍子量表还包括“缺乏运动支持”、“担心不良后果”和“运动体验或感知差”3个维度,共10个项目。量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.917,重测信度为0.941。结论:CHD- pebbs具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评价冠心病患者CER感知水平,为护理中运动康复干预提供精确的靶点和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of the CHD-PEBBS: A Scale to Assess Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers in Coronary Heart Disease Patients.

Background: The level of perceived exercise benefits and barriers is one of the key influencing factors of cardiac exercise rehabilitation (CER). There is a lack of validated tools to assess coronary heart disease (CHD) patients' exercise perception.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop a scale assessing CHD patients' perceived exercise benefits and barriers (CHD-PEBBS) and test its reliability and validity.

Methods: A total of 205 CHD patients were recruited for a cross-sectional survey. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to extract factors, delete items and evaluate construct validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability were used to test the reliability of the scale.

Results: Based on the health belief model, this study developed a perceived benefits and barriers framework. CFA showed that the fit indices (such as χ2/df=2.281, CFI=0.93, RMSEA=0.079) were all acceptable A total of 6 factors were extracted through EFA, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 75.52%. The perceived benefits subscale included 3 dimensions: "improving physiological indicators", "improving quality of life" and "improving physiological function" with a total of 12 items. The perceived barriers subscale also included 3 dimensions: "lacking of exercise support", "worrying about adverse consequences" and "poor exercise experience or perception" with a total of 10 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.917, and the test-retest reliability was 0.941.

Conclusion: The CHD-PEBBS shows good reliability and validity, which may be used to evaluate the CER perception level of CHD patients, offering precise targets and pathways for exercise rehabilitation interventions in nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信