基于解剖的人工耳蜗拟合:优化术后结果的潜力:一项初步研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004586
Nina Rubicz, Belinda Bauer, Maximilian Meng, Paul Martin Zwittag, Nikolaus Poier-Fabian
{"title":"基于解剖的人工耳蜗拟合:优化术后结果的潜力:一项初步研究。","authors":"Nina Rubicz, Belinda Bauer, Maximilian Meng, Paul Martin Zwittag, Nikolaus Poier-Fabian","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether there is a difference in frequency parameters between anatomy-based fitting (ABF) using a preoperative CT scan and clinically based fitting (CBF).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Monocentric retrospective registry study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>23 CI recipients between 2004 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Comparison between frequency maps: CBF versus ABF. The frequency parameters used for ABF were estimated based on preoperative CT scans and implanted electrodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All electrode contact frequencies were significantly different between ABF and CBF maps. When the dataset was manually analyzed, 84% (n = 233) of the predicted electrode location frequencies were outside their allocated frequency band in the clinical fitting map.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Setting the CI filter bank frequencies based on preoperative electrode location estimates could be a useful alternative when postoperative CT or DVT imaging is not feasible or unavailable. This can serve as a good starting point when trying to reduce frequency-to-place mismatch between frequency allocations of the fitting filter bank and the tonotopy of the cochlea.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy-Based Fitting in Cochlear Implants: Potential for Optimizing Postoperative Outcomes: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Rubicz, Belinda Bauer, Maximilian Meng, Paul Martin Zwittag, Nikolaus Poier-Fabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether there is a difference in frequency parameters between anatomy-based fitting (ABF) using a preoperative CT scan and clinically based fitting (CBF).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Monocentric retrospective registry study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>23 CI recipients between 2004 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Comparison between frequency maps: CBF versus ABF. The frequency parameters used for ABF were estimated based on preoperative CT scans and implanted electrodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All electrode contact frequencies were significantly different between ABF and CBF maps. When the dataset was manually analyzed, 84% (n = 233) of the predicted electrode location frequencies were outside their allocated frequency band in the clinical fitting map.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Setting the CI filter bank frequencies based on preoperative electrode location estimates could be a useful alternative when postoperative CT or DVT imaging is not feasible or unavailable. This can serve as a good starting point when trying to reduce frequency-to-place mismatch between frequency allocations of the fitting filter bank and the tonotopy of the cochlea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1095-1100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨术前CT扫描解剖拟合(ABF)和临床拟合(CBF)在频率参数上是否存在差异。研究设计:单中心回顾性登记研究。环境:三级学术医疗中心。患者:2004年至2021年间接受CI治疗的23名患者。干预措施:CI。主要结果测量:频率图之间的比较:CBF与ABF。用于ABF的频率参数是根据术前CT扫描和植入电极估计的。结果:所有电极接触频率在ABF图和CBF图之间有显著差异。当对数据集进行人工分析时,84% (n = 233)的预测电极位置频率在临床拟合图中的分配频带之外。结论:当术后CT或DVT成像不可行或不可用时,根据术前电极位置估计设置CI滤波器组频率可能是一种有用的替代方法。这可以作为一个很好的起点,当试图减少频率分配的拟合滤波器组和耳蜗的拓扑之间的频率对位置的不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomy-Based Fitting in Cochlear Implants: Potential for Optimizing Postoperative Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

Objectives: To investigate whether there is a difference in frequency parameters between anatomy-based fitting (ABF) using a preoperative CT scan and clinically based fitting (CBF).

Study design: Monocentric retrospective registry study.

Setting: Tertiary academic medical center.

Patients: 23 CI recipients between 2004 and 2021.

Interventions: CI.

Main outcome measures: Comparison between frequency maps: CBF versus ABF. The frequency parameters used for ABF were estimated based on preoperative CT scans and implanted electrodes.

Results: All electrode contact frequencies were significantly different between ABF and CBF maps. When the dataset was manually analyzed, 84% (n = 233) of the predicted electrode location frequencies were outside their allocated frequency band in the clinical fitting map.

Conclusions: Setting the CI filter bank frequencies based on preoperative electrode location estimates could be a useful alternative when postoperative CT or DVT imaging is not feasible or unavailable. This can serve as a good starting point when trying to reduce frequency-to-place mismatch between frequency allocations of the fitting filter bank and the tonotopy of the cochlea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信