[共同决策]。

Q4 Medicine
Stefan M Haensel, Hester M van de Bovenkamp, Noralie H Geessink, Joost S Groen, Anne M Stiggelbout
{"title":"[共同决策]。","authors":"Stefan M Haensel, Hester M van de Bovenkamp, Noralie H Geessink, Joost S Groen, Anne M Stiggelbout","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In shared decision making (SDM), healthcare providers and patients collaborate towards treatment decisions based on equal input, scientific evidence, and patient preferences. Successful implementation requires clear information, patient support, effective communication, and provider training. SDM increases patient satisfaction and reduces decision regret. Its impact on health outcomes, costs, and consultation time appears neutral to positive. Patients particularly value autonomy, clear information, and opportunities for dialogue. This approach is best suited for preference-sensitive decisions and is more challenging in acute life-threatening situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Shared decision making].\",\"authors\":\"Stefan M Haensel, Hester M van de Bovenkamp, Noralie H Geessink, Joost S Groen, Anne M Stiggelbout\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In shared decision making (SDM), healthcare providers and patients collaborate towards treatment decisions based on equal input, scientific evidence, and patient preferences. Successful implementation requires clear information, patient support, effective communication, and provider training. SDM increases patient satisfaction and reduces decision regret. Its impact on health outcomes, costs, and consultation time appears neutral to positive. Patients particularly value autonomy, clear information, and opportunities for dialogue. This approach is best suited for preference-sensitive decisions and is more challenging in acute life-threatening situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在共享决策(SDM)中,医疗保健提供者和患者在平等输入、科学证据和患者偏好的基础上协作制定治疗决策。成功的实施需要清晰的信息、病人的支持、有效的沟通和提供者的培训。SDM提高患者满意度,减少决策后悔。它对健康结果、费用和咨询时间的影响似乎是中性到积极的。患者特别重视自主权、清晰的信息和对话的机会。这种方法最适合于偏好敏感的决策,但在严重危及生命的情况下更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Shared decision making].

In shared decision making (SDM), healthcare providers and patients collaborate towards treatment decisions based on equal input, scientific evidence, and patient preferences. Successful implementation requires clear information, patient support, effective communication, and provider training. SDM increases patient satisfaction and reduces decision regret. Its impact on health outcomes, costs, and consultation time appears neutral to positive. Patients particularly value autonomy, clear information, and opportunities for dialogue. This approach is best suited for preference-sensitive decisions and is more challenging in acute life-threatening situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信