癌症研究中的性取向和性别认同测量:来自美国老年人的反馈。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mandi L Pratt-Chapman, Bethany Tennant, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Christopher W Wheldon, Scout Nfn, Carl G Streed, Kristi Tredway, Sarah S Jackson
{"title":"癌症研究中的性取向和性别认同测量:来自美国老年人的反馈。","authors":"Mandi L Pratt-Chapman, Bethany Tennant, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Christopher W Wheldon, Scout Nfn, Carl G Streed, Kristi Tredway, Sarah S Jackson","doi":"10.1177/23258292251362128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To improve upon measures of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) used in previous studies, we created and tested seven measures for inclusion in cancer research and refined them based on input from study participants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between February and March 2024, cognitive interviews were conducted virtually with a purposive sample of 18 adults ≥50 years old. Equal numbers of participants identified as LGBTQ+ (<i>n</i> = 9) and cisgender heterosexual (<i>n</i> = 9). We chose older adults because-for the most part-participants in past studies on SOGI data acceptability have been younger than those typically recruited in cancer-related studies. Participants were selected for maximum diversity in age, race/ethnicity, U.S. geographic region, and political ideology. Descriptive themes and patterns for each measure were organized, evaluated, synthesized, and summarized. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants found six of seven tested measures easy to answer. Respondents were satisfied with being able to choose more than one response option for each item. Some terms, (e.g., response options \"cisgender\" and \"non-binary\" for gender identity measure) were new to some respondents. Revisions to measures were made based on respondent feedback. The breast/chest tissue item confused most respondents, so it was withdrawn. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study found that most tested SOGI measures were easy to understand, and the response options were appropriate. Refined measures can serve as a resource for investigators and clinicians to employ who wish to improve SOGI data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Measures for Cancer Research: Feedback from Older Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Mandi L Pratt-Chapman, Bethany Tennant, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Christopher W Wheldon, Scout Nfn, Carl G Streed, Kristi Tredway, Sarah S Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23258292251362128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To improve upon measures of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) used in previous studies, we created and tested seven measures for inclusion in cancer research and refined them based on input from study participants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between February and March 2024, cognitive interviews were conducted virtually with a purposive sample of 18 adults ≥50 years old. Equal numbers of participants identified as LGBTQ+ (<i>n</i> = 9) and cisgender heterosexual (<i>n</i> = 9). We chose older adults because-for the most part-participants in past studies on SOGI data acceptability have been younger than those typically recruited in cancer-related studies. Participants were selected for maximum diversity in age, race/ethnicity, U.S. geographic region, and political ideology. Descriptive themes and patterns for each measure were organized, evaluated, synthesized, and summarized. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants found six of seven tested measures easy to answer. Respondents were satisfied with being able to choose more than one response option for each item. Some terms, (e.g., response options \\\"cisgender\\\" and \\\"non-binary\\\" for gender identity measure) were new to some respondents. Revisions to measures were made based on respondent feedback. The breast/chest tissue item confused most respondents, so it was withdrawn. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study found that most tested SOGI measures were easy to understand, and the response options were appropriate. Refined measures can serve as a resource for investigators and clinicians to employ who wish to improve SOGI data collection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LGBT health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LGBT health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292251362128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292251362128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了改进以前研究中使用的性取向和性别认同(SOGI)测量方法,我们创建并测试了7种用于癌症研究的测量方法,并根据研究参与者的输入对其进行了改进。方法:于2024年2月至3月对18名年龄≥50岁的成年人进行虚拟认知访谈。LGBTQ+ (n = 9)和异性恋(n = 9)的参与者人数相同。我们之所以选择老年人,是因为在过去的SOGI数据可接受性研究中,大多数参与者都比癌症相关研究中通常招募的参与者年轻。参与者在年龄、种族/民族、美国地理区域和政治意识形态方面的选择最大程度地多样化。对每个测量的描述性主题和模式进行了组织、评估、综合和总结。结果:大多数参与者发现七个测试中的六个很容易回答。受访者对能够为每个项目选择多个回答选项感到满意。有些术语(例如,性别认同测量的回答选项“顺性别”和“非二元”)对一些受访者来说是新的。根据受访者的反馈,对措施进行了修订。乳房/胸部组织项目混淆了大多数受访者,所以它被撤回。结论:本研究发现,大多数测试的SOGI测量方法易于理解,反应选项是适当的。对于希望改进SOGI数据收集的研究人员和临床医生来说,改进的测量方法可以作为一种资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Measures for Cancer Research: Feedback from Older Americans.

Purpose: To improve upon measures of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) used in previous studies, we created and tested seven measures for inclusion in cancer research and refined them based on input from study participants. Methods: Between February and March 2024, cognitive interviews were conducted virtually with a purposive sample of 18 adults ≥50 years old. Equal numbers of participants identified as LGBTQ+ (n = 9) and cisgender heterosexual (n = 9). We chose older adults because-for the most part-participants in past studies on SOGI data acceptability have been younger than those typically recruited in cancer-related studies. Participants were selected for maximum diversity in age, race/ethnicity, U.S. geographic region, and political ideology. Descriptive themes and patterns for each measure were organized, evaluated, synthesized, and summarized. Results: Most participants found six of seven tested measures easy to answer. Respondents were satisfied with being able to choose more than one response option for each item. Some terms, (e.g., response options "cisgender" and "non-binary" for gender identity measure) were new to some respondents. Revisions to measures were made based on respondent feedback. The breast/chest tissue item confused most respondents, so it was withdrawn. Conclusions: This study found that most tested SOGI measures were easy to understand, and the response options were appropriate. Refined measures can serve as a resource for investigators and clinicians to employ who wish to improve SOGI data collection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信